Abstract
Background
Association between parkinsonism and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) still remains debated. There is already plenty of evidences in the literature suggesting that this clinical sign can be considered as an integral part of the clinical spectrum of iNPH patients.
Methods
We reviewed the possible pitfalls in the core clinical definition of iNPH based on available international diagnostic criteria, phenomenology of parkinsonism in iNPH, and neuroimaging supporting the presence of parkinsonism in iNPH.
Conclusions
We argue that the diagnostic definition of the iNPH “triad” should be possibly reconsidered as a “tetrad” also including parkinsonism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Pitfalls in the core clinical definition of iNPH
The definition of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) comes from early anecdotal descriptions by Salomon Hakim and Raymond Adams [1]. Their three reported cases already appeared heterogeneous in terms of etiology, anamnestic data, and clinical presentation. Yet, they coined the famous clinical triad of impaired walking and balance, urinary incontinence, and cognitive decline. Later on, the term “idiopathic” has been adopted to define those conditions with ventricular enlargement and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the absence of identifiable acquired causes of NPH.
To date, at least four diagnostic guidelines based on clinical, radiological, and instrumental features have been published [2,3,4,5]. Despite this, diagnostic problems still persist. The presence of further clinical signs in addition to the aforementioned triad calls into question the accuracy of the proposed criteria when used in the differential diagnosis with other neurodegenerative conditions, primarily Parkinson’s disease (PD) but also other atypical parkinsonisms.
The American-European guidelines proposed in 2005 include two levels of diagnostic accuracy [2]. The diagnosis of “possible” idiopathic NPH (iNPH) can be made by the presence of at least one sign of the classical triad in the context of ventriculomegaly on brain imaging. On the other hand, gait and balance problems are mandatory for the diagnosis of “probable” iNPH, when associated with at least one other area of impairment in cognition, urinary symptoms, or both, specific supportive neuroimaging features as well as a CSF opening pressure documented in the 5–18 mmHg (or 70–245 mmH2O) range. Although several characteristics of gait impairment required for diagnosis are specified, it is also stated that they “may coexist with other conditions” documented in the same patient (including neurodegenerative conditions such as PD), but “should not be entirely attributable” to them. Furthermore, although not included as a diagnostic criterion, “parkinsonism” is considered a possible detectable clinical feature in iNPH, with a variable response reported to L-dopa treatment and shunt procedures. No specific information is provided on the differential diagnosis with PD.
The third edition of the Japanese guidelines supports a diagnosis of “possible” iNPH based on at least two clinical signs of the classical triad [5]. The level of diagnostic accuracy increases to “probable” when all of the following requirements are met: a normal CSF opening pressure (≤ 200 mmH2O), a response from 24 h to 1 week after CSF tap test or external lumbar drainage and the presence of neuroradiological patterns such as “DESH” (i.e., “disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus”). In probable iNPH, gait impairment is characterized by small shuffling steps and dynamic instability on walking and turning. A diagnosis of “definite” iNPH requires a clinical response to shunting procedures. The clinical diagnosis is substantially entrusted to the presence of a gait disturbance and the frequent lack of a complete clinical triad is highlighted. However, even these guidelines fail to characterize the specific gait features useful in the differential diagnosis with degenerative parkinsonisms.
Evidences of parkinsonism in iNPH
Parkinsonism is an often overlooked clinical feature of iNPH. From the earliest descriptions, it seemed clear that the presence of parkinsonism could not preclude a clinical response to shunt procedures, nor that the gait abnormalities could be different from those observed in PD [6]. Akinesia in iNPH has been reported in nearly 70% of cases, with bradykinesia and postural instability being the main observed features [7, 8]. Hypokinetic motor deficit may involve the upper limbs in iNPH, sharing the same characteristics observed in PD [9]. Several types of parkinsonism, including a symmetrical lower body parkinsonism, but also an asymmetrical and even dominant upper body phenotype, may be part of the clinical presentation of iNPH [10].
Although the clinical response to L-dopa was generally reported as poor in these patients, a motor response was documented by acute challenge testing as well as after 4–6 weeks of dopaminergic treatment with L-dopa up to 1250 mg/day, before testing patients with iNPH to shunt response [11]. The response of parkinsonian signs to tap test or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt has been poorly explored in iNPH associated with parkinsonism and the results have been inconsistent, even because parkinsonism has only rarely been considered an outcome measure [12]. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score reduction has been reported to vary between 12 and 18% after tap test or external lumbar drainage [12, 13]. Following ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures, a response rate of 37% after 1 week and 25% after 1 year has been estimated [14, 15], with over 60% of patients showing greater than 30% improvement on UPDRS motor score [15].
There are uncertainties in the definition of “parkinsonism” and “gait disturbance” in iNPH. The definition of “parkinsonism” is provided by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) diagnostic criteria for PD as prerequisite for the clinical diagnosis [16]. Parkinsonism should be distinguished from clinical PD since it can be detected in other neurodegenerative conditions such as tauopathies [16]. Parkinsonism is based on the presence of bradykinesia as a cardinal feature, in combination with resting tremor, rigidity, or both. “Bradykinesia” has also been strictly defined as slowness of movement and a decrease in amplitude or speed as movements continue (the so-called “sequence effect”), being better characterized for PD and less for other atypical parkinsonisms [16, 17]. Although routinely evaluated and documented as bradykinesia of the limbs, it can also be described during gait, with a progressive reduction of the step length leading to motor blocks (“freezing” phenomenon) [17, 18].
Human locomotion is the result of the modulation of the central spinal pattern generators induced by the supraspinal regions, which include the pontomedullary reticular formation, the mesencephalic locomotor region, the basal ganglia and the frontal cortical regions [19]. When the basal ganglia and supplementary motor area (SMA) loops are disrupted, self-initiated movements are affected leading to freezing of gait and the dependence of walking on external cues to maintain locomotor thrust [19]. In this scenario, it could be argued that pathological conditions affecting both the frontal lobe and the basal ganglia may share the same gait dysfunctions [19, 20]. Clinically, the presence of lower body parkinsonism with postural instability can in fact lead to a diagnostic overlap between iNPH and PD, vascular parkinsonism and atypical parkinsonism such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) [21, 22]. While some studies have proposed characteristic gait features that discriminate iNPH from PD, such as enlarged stride width, larger foot angles, and lack of improvement with cues [23], others have reported similar patterns in both conditions [24]. A more recent gait analysis study paper found that gait in iNPH and PSP largely overlaps unless specific dual task conditions are considered [25]. Furthermore, there is some evidence that iNPH patients with and without parkinsonian symptoms may report similar improvement after the diagnostic CSF tap test [26]. On the other hand, vascular parkinsonism, a still debated nosological entity, has been reported to respond to CSF drainage when associated with ventriculomegaly [20, 27, 28].
Neuroimaging support of parkinsonism in iNPH
Parkinsonism in iNPH has been correlated with structural data from neuroimaging, including binding of the striatal dopamine reuptake transporter [29], brain ventricular enlargement estimated from morphometric measurements [14], and injury burden white matter, which may even improve after shunt procedures [30].
It has mainly been postulated that parkinsonian features in iNPH could be related to several mechanisms responsible for the disconnection between cortico-subcortical networks at different levels: midbrain, pallido-thalamic fibers, or fibers that connect the thalamus to the SMA [31]. Evidence supporting possible pathophysiological mechanisms inducing parkinsonism in iNPH has been provided by functional neuroimaging.
A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study demonstrated a significant enhanced SMA activity during finger motor performance in iNPH patients after CSF drainage, hypothesizing that improved motor performance after CSF subtraction could be related to a direct effect on cortical areas involved in the preparation and monitoring of movement [32]. SMA and its connections with the basal ganglia have been also examined in patients with PD, with evidence of their hypoactivity on fMRI during the pharmacological “off” phase, being restored after taking L-dopa [33], thus indicating similar pathogenetic bases.
Furthermore, a postsynaptic dysfunction of D2 receptors in the dorsal putamen and nucleus accumbens has been demonstrated in a positron emission tomography (PET) study including patients with iNPH and parkinsonism [34], which is restored after shunt [35]. The results suggest that down-regulation of the postsynaptic D2 receptor could be related to a dysfunction of the cortico-striatal network due to hydrocephalus. This hypothesis on the mechanical effect exerted on the striatum by ventriculomegaly, which should be prominent in the caudate nucleus leading to the downregulation of dopaminergic transporters, has also been supported by single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) studies [29, 36, 37]. In a recent paper striatal dopamine reuptake transporter density has been shown to differentiate iNPH patients with prevalent imbalance from those with major locomotor impairment, which also demonstrated a significant association between parkinsonism and striatal uptake only for the latter phenotype [38]. Gait and caudate radiotracer binding improved in both phenotypes after surgery, while parkinsonism and putamen radiotracer density improved in shunted patients with major locomotor impairment. Study patients presented no response to L-dopa on parkinsonian features [38]. This finding further supports the close link between gait disturbance and parkinsonism in iNPH. Evidence of Lewy body pathology in iNPH was also supported by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy studies, which demonstrated cardiac sympathetic abnormality in some patients [39].
Proposals for a redefinition of iNPH diagnostic criteria
Based on the reported evidence, which includes: (a) the underestimated real prevalence of parkinsonism in iNPH; (b) the difficulty in identifying iNPH-specific gait parameters without taking into account the possible features seen in “lower body parkinsonism”; (c) the response of parkinsonian signs to surgical shunting procedures; (d) the rare but possible response of parkinsonian signs in iNPH to dopaminergic treatment; (e) the neuroimaging evidences supporting possible pathophysiological mechanisms inducing parkinsonism in iNPH, it is necessary to re-evaluate the classic clinical diagnostic triad for iNPH, including the presence of parkinsonism as a component of a tetrad of symptoms beside to gait disturbances, cognitive impairment, and urinary dysfunction. Definition of specific clinical aspects and instrumental supporting features of parkinsonism associated to iNPH should be discussed among study groups and experts in this field.
References
Hakim S, Adams RD (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2:307–327
Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S4–S16
Ishikawa M, Hashimoto M, Kuwana N, Mori E, Miyake H, Wachi A, Takeuchi T, Kazui H, Koyama H (2008) Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 48(Suppl):S1–S23
Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Hashimoto M, Kuriyama N, Tokuda T, Ishii K, Kaijima M, Hirata Y, Saito M, Arai H, Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (2012) Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus : second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52:775–809
Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, Kanemoto H, Suehiro T, Yoshiyama K, Kameda M, Kajimoto Y, Mase M, Murai H, Kita D, Kimura T, Samejima N, Tokuda T, Kaijima M, Akiba C, Kawamura K, Atsuchi M, Hirata Y, Matsumae M, Sasaki M, Yamashita F, Aoki S, Irie R, Miyake H, Kato T, Mori E, Ishikawa M, Date I, Arai H, research committee of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, (2021) Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 61:63–97
Lobo Antunes J, Fahn S, Cote L (1983) Normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl 19:225–231
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Droste DW, Orszagh M, Borremans JJ, Vach W (1997) Movement disorders in adult hydrocephalus. Mov Disord 12:53–60
Molde K, Söderström L, Laurell K (2017) Parkinsonian symptoms in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a population-based study. J Neurol 264:2141–2148
Nowak DA, Topka HR (2006) Broadening a classic clinical triad: The hypokinetic motor disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus also affects the hand. Exp Neurol 198:81–87
Youn J, Todisco M, Zappia M, Pacchetti C, Fasano A (2022) Parkinsonism and cerebrospinal fluid disorders. J Neurol Sci 433:120019
Morishita T, Foote KD, Okun MS (2010) INPH and Parkinson disease: differentiation by levodopa response. Nat Rev Neurol 6:52–56
Mostile G, Portaro G, Certo F, Luca A, Manna R, Terranova R, Altieri R, Nicoletti A, Barbagallo GMV, Zappia M (2021) iNPH with parkinsonism: response to lumbar CSF drainage and ventriculoperitoneal shunting. J Neurol 268:1254–1265
Kang K, Jeon JS, Kim T, Choi D, Ko PW, Hwang SK, Lee HW (2016) Asymmetric and upper body parkinsonism in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurol 12:452–459
Ishii M, Kawamata T, Akiguchi I, Yagi H, Watanabe Y, Watanabe T, Mashimo H (2010) Parkinsonian symptomatology may correlate with CT findings before and after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Parkinsons Dis 2010:201089
Broggi M, Redaelli V, Tringali G, Restelli F, Romito L, Schiavolin S, Tagliavini F, Broggi G (2016) Normal pressure hydrocephalus and parkinsonism: preliminary data on neurosurgical and neurological treatment. World Neurosurg 90:348–356
Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Gasser T, Dubois B, Chan P, Bloem BR, Adler CH, Deuschl G (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30:1591–1601
Bologna M, Paparella G, Fasano A, Hallett M, Berardelli A (2020) Evolving concepts on bradykinesia. Brain 143:727–750
Iansek R, Danoudis M (2016) Freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease: its pathophysiology and pragmatic approaches to management. Mov Disord Clin Pract 4:290–297
Nutt JG, Bloem BR, Giladi N, Hallett M, Horak FB, Nieuwboer A (2011) Freezing of gait: moving forward on a mysterious clinical phenomenon. Lancet Neurol 10:734–744
Mostile G, Nicoletti A, Zappia M (2018) Vascular parkinsonism: still looking for a diagnosis. Front Neurol 9:411
Starr BW, Hagen MC, Espay AJ (2014) Hydrocephalic parkinsonism: lessons from normal pressure hydrocephalus mimics. J Clin Mov Disord 1:2
Höglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Kurz C, Josephs KA, Lang AE, Mollenhauer B, Müller U, Nilsson C, Whitwell JL, Arzberger T, Englund E, Gelpi E, Giese A, Irwin DJ, Meissner WG, Pantelyat A, Rajput A, van Swieten JC, Troakes C, Antonini A, Bhatia KP, Bordelon Y, Compta Y, Corvol JC, Colosimo C, Dickson DW, Dodel R, Ferguson L, Grossman M, Kassubek J, Krismer F, Levin J, Lorenzl S, Morris HR, Nestor P, Oertel WH, Poewe W, Rabinovici G, Rowe JB, Schellenberg GD, Seppi K, van Eimeren T, Wenning GK, Boxer AL, Golbe LI, Litvan I; Movement Disorder Society-endorsed PSP Study Group (2017) Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the movement disorder society criteria. Mov Disord 32:853–864
Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drücke H, Jöhnk K, Illert M, Deuschl G (2001) Comparative analysis of the gait disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:289–297
Bugalho P, Alves L, Miguel R (2013) Gait dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease and normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 120:1201–1207
Selge C, Schoeberl F, Zwergal A, Nuebling G, Brandt T, Dieterich M, Schniepp R, Jahn K (2018) Gait analysis in PSP and NPH: Dual-task conditions make the difference. Neurology 90:e1021–e1028
Davis A, Gulyani S, Manthripragada L, Luciano M, Moghekar A, Yasar S (2021) Evaluation of the effect comorbid Parkinson syndrome on normal pressure hydrocephalus assessment. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 207:106810
Ondo WG, Chan LL, Levy JK (2022) Vascular parkinsonism: clinical correlates predicting motor improvement after lumbar puncture. Mov Disord 17:91–97
Giliberto C, Mostile G, Lo Fermo S, Reggio E, Sciacca G, Nicoletti A, Zappia M (2017) Vascular parkinsonism or idiopathic NPH? New insights from CSF pressure analysis. Neurol Sci 38:2209–2212
Pozzi NG, Brumberg J, Todisco M, Minafra B, Zangaglia R, Bossert I, Trifirò G, Ceravolo R, Vitali P, Isaias IU, Fasano A, Pacchetti C (2021) Striatal dopamine deficit and motor impairment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Mov Disord 36:124–132
Akiguchi I, Ishii M, Watanabe Y, Watanabe T, Kawasaki T, Yagi H, Shiino A, Shirakashi Y, Kawamoto Y (2008) Shunt-responsive parkinsonism and reversible white matter lesions in patients with idiopathic NPH. J Neurol 255:1392–1399
Curran T, Lang AE (1994) Parkinsonian syndromes associated with hydrocephalus: case reports, a review of the literature, and pathophysiological hypotheses. Mov Disord 9:508–520
Lenfeldt N, Larsson A, Nyberg L, Andersson M, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J (2008) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: increased supplementary motor activity accounts for improvement after CSF drainage. Brain 131:2904–2912
Haslinger B, Erhard P, Kämpfe N, Boecker H, Rummeny E, Schwaiger M, Conrad B, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2001) Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson’s disease before and after levodopa. Brain 124:558–570
Ouchi Y, Nakayama T, Kanno T, Yoshikawa E, Shinke T, Torizuka T (2007) In vivo presynaptic and postsynaptic striatal dopamine functions in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27:803–810
Nakayama T, Ouchi Y, Yoshikawa E, Sugihara G, Torizuka T, Tanaka K (2007) Striatal D2 receptor availability after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Nucl Med 48:1981–1986
Del Gamba C, Bruno A, Frosini D, Volterrani D, Migaleddu G, Benedetto N, Perrini P, Pacchetti C, Cosottini M, Bonuccelli U, Ceravolo R (2021) Is DAT imaging abnormality in normal pressure hydrocephalus always suggestive of degeneration? Neurol Sci 42:723–726
Sarica A, Quattrone A, Quarantelli M, Arcuri PP, Mechelli A, La Torre D, Vaccaro MG, Cascini GL, Quattrone A (2021) Reduced striatal DAT uptake normalizes after shunt in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mov Disord 36:261–262
Todisco M, Zangaglia R, Minafra B, Pisano P, Trifirò G, Bossert I, Pozzi NG, Brumberg J, Ceravolo R, Isaias IU, Fasano A, Pacchetti C (2021) Clinical outcome and striatal dopaminergic function after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 96:e2861–e2873
Odagiri H, Baba T, Nishio Y, Iizuka O, Narita W, Matsuda M, Mori E (2015) Clinical characteristics of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Lewy body diseases. J Neurol Sci 359:309–311
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Catania within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GM and MZ wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AF edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AF received honoraria from AbbVie, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Ceregate, Ipsen, Integra, Medtronic, and UCB and research support from AbbVie, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. GM and MZ declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mostile, G., Fasano, A. & Zappia, M. Parkinsonism in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: is it time for defining a clinical tetrad?. Neurol Sci 43, 5201–5205 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06119-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06119-3