Skip to main content
Log in

The role of clivus length and cranial base flexion angle in basilar invagination and Chiari malformation pathophysiology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The craniovertebral junction is an anatomically well-defined transitional zone located between the skull and the cervical spine. Multiple malformations can affect this region with the most prominent being basilar invagination (BI) and Chiari malformation (CM). Despite numerous studies, the origin, pathophysiology, and classification of these pathologies remain controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implication of cranial base flexion angle and clivus length in the development of these conditions.

Methods

Midline tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects and patients diagnosed with BI (types I and II) and Chiari malformation were evaluated. A craniometric study of the skull base was performed. Linear and angular measurements were used for comparisons between groups.

Results

109 images from patients with craniovertebral junction malformation and controls were evaluated. Seventeen had BI-I, 26 had BI-II, 36 had CM, and 30 were normal subjects. Demographic data for the two groups were not significantly different. Craniometric analysis of images revealed a gradation in linear and angular variables from controls to CM, BI-I, and BI-II patients. Clivus length was significantly smaller in BI-II patients compared with other groups, while basal angle was greater. Moderate or strong correlations were noted among all variables analyzed.

Conclusion

Data suggest that clivus length and basal angle may play a role in pathophysiology of BI and CM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BI:

Basilar invagination

CL:

Clivus length

CM:

Chiari malformation

CVJ:

Craniovertebral junction

CVJM:

Craniovertebral junction malformation

HNFA:

Head-neck flexion angle

CL:

Violation of the chamberlain’s line

References

  1. Black SM, Scheuer JL (1996) Occipitalization of the atlas with reference to its embryological development. Int J Osteoarchaeol 6:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Botelho RV, Ferreira EDZ (2013) Angular craniometry in craniocervical junction malformation. Neurosurg Rev 36:604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Botelho RV, Ferreira JA, Ferreira EDZ (2018) Basilar Invagination: a craniocervical kyphosis. World Neurosurg 117:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira EDZ, Botelho RV (2015) Atlas assimilation patterns in different types of adult craniocervical junction malformations. Spine 40:1763–1768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira JA, Botelho RV (2015) The odontoid process invagination in normal subjects, Chiari malformation and basilar invagination patients: pathophysiologic correlations with angular craniometry. SurgNeurolInt 6:118

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geus CM, Bergman JEH, Ravenswaaij-Arts CMAV, Meiners LC (2018) Imaging of clival hypoplasia in CHARGE syndrome and hypothesis for development: a case-control study. Am J Neuroradiol 39:1938–1942

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Goel A (2017) Short neck, short head, short spine, and short body height. Hallmarks of basilar invagination. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 8:165–167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K (1998) Basilar invagination: a study based on 190 surgically treated patients. J Neurosurg 88:962–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel A, Jain S, Shah A (2018) Radiological evaluation of 510 cases of basilar invagination with evidence of atlantoaxial instability (group A basilar invagination). World Neurosurg 110:533–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joaquim AF, Tedeschi H, Chandra PS (2018) Controversies in the surgical management of congenital craniocervical junction disorders – a critical review. Neurol India 66:1003–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menezes AH (2004) Developmental abnormalities of the craniovertebral junction. In: Winn HR (ed) Youman’s Neurological Surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 3334

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller F, O’Rahilly R (2003) Segmentation in staged human embryos: the occipitocervical region revisited. J Anat 203:297–315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishikawa M, Sakamoto H, Hakuba A, Nakanishi N, Inoue Y (1997) Pathogenesis of Chiari malformation: a morphometric study of the posterior cranial fossa. J Neurosurg 86:40–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pang D, Thompson DN (2011) Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 27:523–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rai R, Iwanaga J, Shokouhi G, Loukas M, Mortazavi MM, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2018) A comprehensive review of the clivus: anatomy, embryology, variants, pathology, and surgical approaches. Childs Nerv Syst 34:1451–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Abel MF, Menezes AH (2010) Basilar Invagination. Neurosurg 66:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smoker WR (1994) Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. RadioGraphic 14:255–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo V. Botelho.

Ethics declarations

This work was conducted in accordance with Brazilian ethical standards (Resolution No. 510, dated April 7, 2016).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diniz, J.M., Botelho, R.V. The role of clivus length and cranial base flexion angle in basilar invagination and Chiari malformation pathophysiology. Neurol Sci 41, 1751–1757 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04248-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04248-1

Keywords

Navigation