Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stroke knowledge in Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stroke knowledge improves public behavior in terms of prevention, symptom recognition, and timely response. Contemporary data on stroke awareness in the Italian general population are lacking. This study surveyed public knowledge of risk factors, warning signs, and proper reactions to stroke among Italian adults. A population-based telephone survey was carried out in a sample of 1,000 residents aged ≥18 years in May–June 2010. The questionnaire included close-ended questions focused on stroke symptoms, risk factors, and treatment options. We examined the prevalence and distribution of stroke knowledge in the community and generated multivariable logistic regression models. Among the 1,000 participants (481 men, mean age 48.8 ± 17.2), only the 55.8 % correctly identified the brain as the affected organ in stroke. The most common risk factor for stroke identified by respondents was hypertension (67.6 %), the most common warning sign was hemiparesis (68.7 %), the 43.5 % could list >1 warning sign. Multivariate analyses indicate that education and previous stroke experience are the only independent predictors of stroke knowledge. Only 26.2 % reported to know about the availability of t-PA treatment. An ambulance would be called by 59 % of respondents in the event of a stroke. Respondents with a high level of education are more likely to call an ambulance in case of stroke. This study provides the first comprehensive data describing stroke knowledge among Italian adults: the general level is suboptimal and is associated only with education and previous family experience of stroke. Public education could potentially improve treatment and prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rasura M, Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Di Lisi F, Patella R, Piccardi B, Polizzi B, Inzitari D (2014) Effectiveness of public stroke educational interventions: a review. Eur J Neurol 21:11–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moser DK, Kimble LP, Alberts MJ, Alonzo A, Croft JB, Dracup K, Evenson KR, Go AS, Hand MM, Kothari RU, Mensah GA, Morris DL, Pancioli AM, Riegel B, Zerwic JJ (2006) Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American heart association council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council. Circulation 114:168–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones SP, Jenkinson AJ, Leathley MJ, Watkins CL (2010) Stroke knowledge and awareness: an integrative review of the evidence. Age Ageing 39:11–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. CCM-Network. Promozione dell’assistenza all’ictus cerebrale in Italia (2014) Centro Nazionale per la prevenzione ed il controllo delle malattie, CCM-Network, Rome, Italy. http://www.ccm-network.it/progetto.jsp?id=node/466&idP=740. Accessed 12 May 2014

  5. Mosley I, Nicol M, Donnan G, Thrift AG, Dewey HM (2014) What is stroke symptom knowledge? Int J Stroke 9:48–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parahoo K, Thompson K, Cooper M, Stringer M, Ennis E, McCollam P (2003) Stroke: awareness of the signs, symptoms and risk factors–a population-based survey. Cerebrovasc Dis 16:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sug Yoon S, Heller RF, Levi C, Wiggers J, Fitzgerald PE (2001) Knowledge of stroke risk factors, warning symptoms, and treatment among an Australian urban population. Stroke 32:1926–1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reeves MJ, Hogan JG, Rafferty AP (2002) Knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs among Michigan adults. Neurology 59:1547–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandian JD, Jaison A, Deepak SS, Kalra G, Shamsher S, Lincoln DJ, Abraham G (2005) Public awareness of warning symptoms, risk factors, and treatment of stroke in northwest India. Stroke 36:644–648 Erratum in: Stroke 36:1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hickey A, Holly D, McGee H, Conroy R, Shelley E (2012) Knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in Ireland: development and application of the stroke awareness questionnaire (SAQ). Int J Stroke 7:298–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleindorfer D, Lindsell CJ, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, Woo D, Flaherty ML, Adeoye O, Zakaria T, Broderick JP, Kissela BM (2010) Which stroke symptoms prompt a 911 call? A population-based study. Am J Emerg Med 28:607–612

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Truelsen T, Krarup LH (2010) Stroke awareness in Denmark. Neuroepidemiology 35:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pancioli AM, Broderick J, Kothari R, Brott T, Tuchfarber A, Miller R, Khoury J, Jauch E (1998) Public perception of stroke warning signs and knowledge of potential risk factors. JAMA 279:1288–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JS, Yoon SS (1997) Perspectives of stroke in persons living in Seoul, South Korea. A survey of 1000 subjects. Stroke 28:1165–1169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neau JP, Ingrand P, Godeneche G (2009) Awareness within the French population concerning stroke signs, symptoms, and risk factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kraywinkel K, Heidrich J, Heuschmann PU, Wagner M, Berger K (2007) Stroke risk perception among participants of a stroke awareness campaign. BMC Public Health 7:39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hickey A, O’Hanlon A, McGee H, Donnellan C, Shelley E, Horgan F, O’Neill D (2009) Stroke awareness in the general population: knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in older adults. BMC Geriatr 9:35

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundelin K, Graciani A, García-Puig J, Guallar-Castillón P, Taboada JM, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Banegas JR (2012) Knowledge of stroke warning symptoms and intended action in response to stroke in Spain: a nationwide population-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis 34:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreira E, Correia M, Magalhães R, Silva MC (2011) Stroke awareness in urban and rural populations from northern Portugal: knowledge and action are independent. Neuroepidemiology 36:265–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Segura T, Vega G, López S, Rubio F, Castillo J (2003) Public perception of stroke in Spain. Cerebrovasc Dis 16:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mikulík R, Bunt L, Hrdlicka D, Dusek L, Václavík D, Kryza J (2008) Calling 911 in response to stroke: a nationwide study assessing definitive individual behavior. Stroke 39:1844–1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fussman C, Rafferty AP, Lyon-Callo S, Morgenstern LB, Reeves MJ (2010) Lack of association between stroke symptom knowledge and intent to call 911: a population-based survey. Stroke 41:1501–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rowe AK, Frankel MR, Sanders KA (2001) Stroke awareness among Georgia adults: epidemiology and considerations regarding measurement. South Med J 94:613–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teuschl Y, Brainin M (2010) Stroke education: discrepancies among factors influencing prehospital delay and stroke knowledge. Int J Stroke 5:187–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lecouturier J, Murtagh MJ, Thomson RG, Ford GA, White M, Eccles M, Rodgers H (2010) Response to symptoms of stroke in the UK: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 10:157

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mrs. Della Santa for preparing the manuscript. This study was supported by the Italian Health Ministry, Project “Promozione dell’assistenza all’ictus cerebrale in Italia” CCM, Grant Capitolo n. 4393/2007.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzia Baldereschi.

Additional information

The members of ‘The Promotion Implementation of Stroke Care in Italy Project Working Group’ are listed in Appendix.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 691 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Promotion and Implementation of Stroke Care in Italy Project Working Group. Coordinators: D. Inzitari (NEUROFARBA Department, Neuroscience Section, University of Florence, Italy); B. Polizzi (Center Disease Control, Health Ministry, Rome, Italy). Participants (in alphabetic order): M. Baldereschi (Institute of Neurosciences, Italian National Research Council, Florence, Italy); L. Candelise (Professor of Neurology, Milan, Italy); D. Consoli (Dept. Neurology, Jazzolino Hospital,Vibo Valentia, Italy); A. Di Carlo (Institute of Neurosciences, Italian National Research Council, Florence, Italy); C. Fieschi (Professor of Neurology, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy); D. Guidetti (Neurology Department, Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy); L. Provinciali (Neurological Clinic, Dept. Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy); M. Rasura (S. Andrea Hospital Stroke Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy); M.L. Sacchetti (Dept. of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy); M. Silvestrini (Neurological Clinic, Dept. Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy; D. Toni (Emergency Department Stroke Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldereschi, M., Di Carlo, A., Vaccaro, C. et al. Stroke knowledge in Italy. Neurol Sci 36, 415–421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1964-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1964-5

Keywords

Navigation