Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the results of both clinical testing and standardised nerve conduction studies performed on patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) complaints, who had been referred to the neurologist by their general practitioners. Analysis of the data of neurological examination and electrodiagnostic tests (EDX) were performed on patients that had been referred by general practitioners. A total of 232 patients with clinically defined CTS, who had been referred by general practitioners, were seen by a neurologist and subsequently underwent electrodiagnostic testing. The diagnosis of CTS made by general practitioners was clinically confirmed by the neurologist in 187 of 232 (81%) patients. In these 187 patients, EDX confirmed CTS clinical diagnosis in 180. In 40 (17%), the neurologists disagreed with the clinical diagnosis of CTS because signs and symptoms were not those of clinical CTS. We showed that general practitioners are very well capable of making a clinical diagnosis of CTS. Therefore, direct referral of patients by general practitioners for nerve conduction studies to have their diagnosis of CTS confirmed is a desirable and time-saving procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
de Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F (1992) Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. J Clin Epidemiol 45:373–376
Bongers FJ, Schellevis FG, van den Bosch WJ, van der Zee J (2007) Carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice (1987 and 2001): incidence and the role of occupational and non-occupational factors. Br J Gen Pract 57:36–39
Burke FD (2000) Carpal tunnel syndrome: reconciling “demand management” with clinical need. J Hand Surg Br 25:121–127
Wildin C, Dias JJ, Heras-Palou C, Bradley MJ, Burke FD (2006) Trends in elective hand surgery referrals from primary care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:543–546
Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, Wilson JR (2002) Second AAEM literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 25:918–922
Claes F, Verhagen WIM, Meulstee J (2007) Current practice in the use of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome by surgeons in the Netherlands. J Hand Surg Br 32E:663–667
Pryse-Phillips WEM (1984) Validation of a diagnostic sign in carpal tunnel Syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:870–872
Witt JC, Hentz JG, Stevens JC (2002) Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve 29:515–522
Dutch Institute of Healthcare Improvement. Dutch Consensus Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (2006). http://www.cbo.nl/product/richtlijnen/folder20021023121843/rl_cts_2006.pdf/view
Mondelli M, Giacchi M, Federico A (1998) Requests for electromyography from general practioners and specialists: critical evaluation. Ital J Neurol Sci 19:195–203
Podnar S (2005) Critical reappraisal of referrals to electromyography and nerve conduction studies. Eur J Neurol 12:150–155
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Claes, F., Bernsen, H., Meulstee, J. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed by general practitioners: an observational study. Neurol Sci 33, 1079–1081 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0904-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0904-x