Abstract
The Chiari malformation (CM) is a syndrome embodied in heterogeneous groups of malformations, spanning from the more benign and known, the CM1, to more complex syndromes such as the rare association with the tethered cord, as spinal lipomas, and the CM2, associated to open spina bifida. The clinical picture may be well expressed and detected at birth or even during intrauterine life, as for CM2, but in the other cases they may run a rather subtle clinical course. The diagnosis of these syndromes is driven by clinical examination and MRI, and it usually requires a multidisciplinary approach in order to plan the therapeutic strategies, such as surgery. Among the diagnostic investigations, the imaging techniques represent the most useful, for their capabilities to detect subclinical lesions, such as syringomyielia and lipoma; the urological investigation is useful to evaluate the urogenital dysfunctions. The neurophysiological investigations represent a non invasive diagnostic procedure to investigate the peripheral nerve, the spinal cord, the brainstem functionalities and more higher brain functions; the nerve conduction studies and the cranial reflexes, the brainstem (BAEP) and the somatosensory (SEPs) evoked potentials (EPs), alone or in combination, can be used for the diagnosis, follow-up and intraoperative monitoring. The most useful diagnostic tools in CM1 are likely represented by the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) and the blink-reflex (BR), while the usefulness of SEPs is still doubtful and debated; in CM2 and tetherd cord the neurophysiological techniques can be combined in different ways in order to make a functional balance and to answer specific questions. BAEPs and BR can be useful to investigate the brain stem functionality and SEP to evaluate whether the ascending sensory pathway to the cortex can be hampered at some level; the visual EPs are particularly useful to evaluate the integrity of posterior visual pathway and visual cortex in the case of associated hydrocephalus. In the tethered cord, both nerve conduction study and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are useful to evaluate motor and sensory dysfunction of the lombosacral roots and nerves and spinal cord for their capability to detect subclinical impairment of conduction along the sensory and motor pathway. Finally, last but not the least, the neurophysiological techniques are remarkably useful during surgery; the intraoperative monitoring (IOM) by means of electromyography and direct nerve stimulation and recordings are able to detect early nerve damage, minimize nerve lesions and optimise the surgical techniques. In the operated children with incomplete removal of lipoma and/or persistent tethering, the recordings of SEP and BAEP are useful to demonstrate a conduction deterioration along the ascending sensory pathway due to increasing tethering of the spinal cord due to somatic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson RC, Emerson RG, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA (2003) Improvement in brainstem auditory evoked potentials after suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformations. J Neurosurg 98(3):459–464
Mori K, Nishimura T (1995) Electrophysiological studies on brainstem function in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 22(3):120–131
Worley G, Erwin CW, Schuster JM, Park Y, Boyko OB, Griebel ML et al (1994) BAEPs in infants with myelomeningocele and later development of Chiari II malformation-related brainstem dysfunction. Dev Med Child Neurol 36(8):707–715
Mayer S, Weisser M, Till H, Grafe G, Geyer C (2010) Congenital myelomeningocele—do we have to change our management? Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:17
Piatt JH Jr (2010) Treatment of myelomeningocele: a review of outcomes and continuing neurosurgical considerations among adults. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6(6):515–525
Shamji MF, Ventureyra EC, Baronia B, Nzau M, Vassilyadi M (2010) Classification of symptomatic Chiari I malformation to guide surgical strategy. Can J Neurol Sci 37(4):482–487
Fujii M, Tomita T, McLone DG, Grant JA, Stack CV, Mori K (1997) Developmental normo-maturation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in children with asymptomatic meningo-myelocele during the first year of life. Childs Nerv Syst 13(3):147–153
Holliday PO III, Pillsbury D, Kelly DL Jr, Dillard R (1985) Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in Arnold-Chiari malformation: possible prognostic value and changes with surgical decompression. Neurosurgery 16(1):48–53
Taylor MJ, Boor R, Keenan NK, Rutka JT, Drake JM (1996) Brainstem auditory and visual evoked potentials in infants with myelomeningocele. Brain Dev 18(2):99–104
Boor R, Schwarz M, Goebel B, Voth D (2004) Somatosensory evoked potentials in Arnold-Chiari malformation. Brain Dev 26(2):99–104
Henriques Filho PS, Pratesi R (2006) Abnormalities in auditory evoked potentials of 75 patients with Arnold-Chiari malformations types I and II. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 64(3A):619–623
Johnson GD, Harbaugh RE, Lenz SB (1994) Surgical decompression of Chiari I malformation for isolated progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Am J Otol 15(5):634–638
Koehler J, Schwarz M, Boor R, Holker C, Hopf HC, Voth D et al (2000) Assessment of brainstem function in Chiari II malformation utilizing brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP), blink reflex and masseter reflex. Brain Dev 22(7):417–420
Lutschg J, Meyer E, Jeanneret-Iseli C, Kaiser G (1985) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in meningomyelocele. Neuropediatrics 16(4):202–204
Luigetti M, Losurdo A, Dittoni S, Testani E, Colicchio S, Gnoni V et al (2010) Improvement of obstructive sleep apneas caused by hydrocephalus associated with Chiari malformation Type II following surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6(4):336–339
Spence J, Pasterkamp H, McDonald PJ (2010) Isolated central sleep apnea in type I Chiari malformation: improvement after surgery. Pediatr Pulmonol 45(11):1141–1144
Anderson RC, Emerson RG, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA (2001) Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials during positioning in a patient undergoing suboccipital craniectomy for Chiari I malformation with syringomyelia. J Child Neurol 16(12):936–939
Anderson RC, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA, Emerson RG (2003) Chiari I malformation: potential role for intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 20(1):65–72
Barley JL, Mooney JF, Glazier SS, Johnson T, Kornegay AL, Turner RP et al (2010) Sudden appearance of new upper extremity motor function while performing neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during tethered cord release: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop 30(6):624–628
Conflict of interest
The author’s declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vidmer, S., Sergio, C., Veronica, S. et al. The neurophysiological balance in Chiari type 1 malformation (CM1), tethered cord and related syndromes. Neurol Sci 32 (Suppl 3), 311–316 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0692-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0692-3