Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive disease of the CNS causing disability and neurological symptoms that carry a substantial burden. Previous Italian studies appear outdated, and investigation on the burden of recently marketed drug treatments should provide further economic evidence for policy makers. The objective of the study was to investigate patterns of care, resource consumption and direct medical cost of MS, in the perspective of the public health-care provider. Ten MS experts from public centres extracted and reported data of all MS patients seen during 2009, using a detailed questionnaire. The data of 8,326 MS patients were analysed: the course was relapsing–remitting in 5,376 (62%), secondary progressive in 1,798 (23%) and primary progressive in 691 (9%); 461 (6%) had a clinically isolated syndrome. The EDSS score was 0–3.5 in 5,118 (61%) patients, 4–6.5 in 2,408 (29%) and 7–9.5 in 800 (10%). The average cost of diagnosis (N = 694) was 1,236 €/patient with large variations between centres due to the chosen diagnostic setting. The average direct medical cost for biological disease-modifying drugs (bio-DMD) was 10,444 €/patient/year (cost/patient by primary drug: 9,501 € for interferon (IFN)-beta1a-im; 8,553 € for IFN-beta1b; 11,255 € for IFN-beta1a-sc44; 9,883 € for IFN-beta1a-sc22; 8,174 € for glatiramer acetate (GA); 21,817 € for natalizumab) and 3,151 € for non-bio-DMD. The cost of diagnosis is largely influenced by care setting, due to local health-care provision patterns. The annual medical cost/patient is largely driven by the cost of drugs (89.2% of total); GA represents the least expensive bio-DMD in the Italian health-care setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pugliatti M, Sotgiu S, Rosati G (2002) The worldwide prevalence of multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 104(3):182–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amato MP, Battaglia MA, Caputo D, Fattore G, Gerzeli S, Pitaro M et al (2002) The costs of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional, multicenter cost-of-illness study in Italy. J Neurol 249(2):152–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobelt G, Pugliatti M (2005) Cost of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur J Neurol 12(Suppl 1):63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobelt G (2004) Economic evidence in multiple sclerosis: a review. EurJ Health Econ 5(Suppl 1):S54–S62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobelt G (2006) Costs and quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in Belgium. Eur J Health Econ 7(Suppl 2):S24–S33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in Europe: method of assessment and analysis. Eur J Health Econ 7(Suppl 2):S5–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Battaglia M, Lucioni C, Uccelli A (2006) Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Italy. Eur J Health Econ 7(Suppl 2):S45–S54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Fredrikson S, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(8):918–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobelt G, Texier-Richard B, Lindgren P (2009) The long-term cost of multiple sclerosis in France and potential changes with disease-modifying interventions. Mult Scler 15(6):741–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vosoughi R, Freedman MS (2010) Therapy of MS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112(5):365–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor PW, Goodman A, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Libonati MA, Metz L, Murray RS, et al. (2004) Randomized multicenter trial of natalizumab in acute MS relapses: clinical and MRI effects. Neurology 62(11):2038–2043

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kobelt G, Berg J, Atherly D, Hadjimichael O (2006) Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in the United States. Neurology 66(11):1696–1702

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministero della Salute. Aggiornamento delle tariffe delle prestazioni di assistenza ospedaliera. Decreto Ministeriale 13/12/2006. www.sanita.it

  14. Ministero della Salute. Tempi Medi di Attività, Modalità di Esecuzione (2006). Nomenclatore delle Prestazioni Specialistiche Ambulatoriali Territoriali. www.sanita.it

  15. GIOFIL (2009). Prontuario Farmaci del Sistema Sanitario Nazionale. www.giofil.it

  16. Asche CV, Ho E, Chan B, Coyte PC (1997) Economic consequences of multiple sclerosis for Canadians. Acta Neurol Scand 95(5):268–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourdette DN, Prochazka AV, Mitchell W, Licari P, Burks J (1993) Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. VA Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation Study Group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74(1):26–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grudzinski AN, Hakim Z, Cox ER, Bootman JL (1999) The economics of multiple sclerosis. Distribution of costs and relationship to disease severity. Pharmacoeconomics 15(3):229–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Henriksson F, Jonsson B (1998) The economic cost of multiple sclerosis in Sweden in 1994. Pharmacoeconomics 13(5 Pt 2):597–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy N, Confavreux C, Haas J, Konig N, Roullet E, Sailer M (1998) Economic evaluation of multiple sclerosis in the UK, Germany and France. Pharmacoeconomics 13(5 Pt 2):607–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pope GC, Urato CJ, Kulas ED, Kronick R, Gilmer T (2002) Prevalence, expenditures, utilization, and payment for persons with MS in insured populations. Neurology 58(1):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whetten-Goldstein K, Sloan FA, Goldstein LB, Kulas ED (1998) A comprehensive assessment of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the United States. Mult Scler 4(5):419–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Russo P, Capone A, Paolillo A, Macchia F, Ranzato F, Costantino G et al (2004) Cost-analysis of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy after the introduction of new disease-modifying agents. Clin Drug Investig 24(7):409–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kobelt G, Kasteng F (2009) Access to innovative treatments in Multiple Sclerosis in Europe. A report prepared for the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA)

  25. Henriksson F, Fredrikson S, Masterman T, Jonsson B (2001) Costs, quality of life and disease severity in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Eur J Neurol 8(1):27–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Sanofi-Aventis, Italy. The authors wish to thank Ms. Anna D’Ausilio for support in data gathering and Ms. Ilaria Piroddi for secretarial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berto P.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

P, B., MP, A., P, B. et al. The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres. Neurol Sci 32, 1035–1041 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0578-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0578-4

Keywords

Navigation