Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coping strategies, cognitive impairment, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis

  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system typically affecting young adults. Psychological coping has proved to be crucially important for adjusting to the adaptive demands of chronic diseases, and in the last few years it has received growing interest in MS. A common finding in the literature is that MS patients tend to adopt dysfunctional avoiding strategies and to rely less on task-oriented and positive attitude strategies, which represent a better adjustment to disease-related challenges. Moreover, the studies show higher psychoticism in MS subjects compared with the general population, and higher levels of depression and anxiety that can contribute to lower QoL perception. In our study including 63 MS patients cognitive functioning did not seem to influence the type of coping. However, subjects with impairment on tasks that assess sustained attention and some aspects of executive function were less prone to adopt positive coping strategies. Cognitive and emotional problems should be carefully monitored, providing prompt diagnosis and treatment as appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen F, Lazarus RS (1979) Coping with the stresses of illness. In: Stone GC, Cohen F, Adler NE et al (eds) Health psychology: a handbook: theories, applications and challenges of a psychological approach to the health care system. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 217–254

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasl SV, Cooper CL (1987) Stress and health: issues in research methodology. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amato MP, Zipoli V (2003) Clinical management of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a review of current evidence. Int MS J 10:72–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakshi R (2003) Fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, impact and management. Mult Scler 9:219–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brajković L, Bras M, Milunović V et al (2009) The connection between coping mechanisms, depression, anxiety and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Coll Antropol 2:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  6. Korostil M, Feinstein A (2007) Anxiety disorders and their clinical correlates in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 13:67–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCabe MP, McKern S (2002) Quality of life and multiple sclerosis: comparison between people with multiple sclerosis and people from the general population. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 9:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Gatto N et al (1997) Depression, coping and level of neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 3:254–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch SG, Kroencke DC, Denney DR (2001) The relationship between disability and depression in multiple sclerosis: the role of uncertainty, coping, and hope. Mult Scler 7:411–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Warren S, Warren KG, Cockerill R (1991) Emotional stress and coping in multiple sclerosis (MS) exacerbations. J Psychosom Res 35:37–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gay MC, Vrignaud P, Garitte C et al (2010) Predictors of depression in multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand 121:161–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ratsep T, Kallasmaa T, Pulver A et al (2000) Personality as a predictor of coping efforts in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 6:397–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goretti B, Portaccio E, Zipoli V et al (2009) Coping strategies, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 30:15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lode K, Bru E, Klevan G, Myhr KM, Nyland H, Larsen JP (2009) Coping with multiple sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01313.x

  15. Arnett PA, Higginson CI, Voss WD et al (2002) Relationship between coping, cognitive dysfunction and depression in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol 16:341–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrensperger MM, Grether A, Romer G et al (2008) Neuropsychological dysfunction, depression, physical disability, and coping processes in families with a parent affected by multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 14:1106–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabinowitz AR, Arnett PA (2009) A longitudinal analysis of cognitive dysfunction, coping, and depression in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology 23:581–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goretti B, Portaccio E, Zipoli V et al (2010) Impact of cognitive impairment on coping strategies in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112:127–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbarotto R, Laiacona M, Frosio R et al (1998) A normative study on visual reaction times and two Stroop colour-word tests. Ital J Neurol Sci 19:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guedj E, Allali G, Goetz C et al (2008) Frontal Assessment Battery is a marker of dorsolateral and medial frontal functions: a SPECT study in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Sci 15:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedetta Goretti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goretti, B., Portaccio, E., Zipoli, V. et al. Coping strategies, cognitive impairment, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 31 (Suppl 2), 227–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0372-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0372-8

Keywords

Navigation