Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is considered the most painful form of primary headaches. It is characterized by severe unilateral pain, typically associated with autonomic manifestations and may be divided into an episodic and a chronic form. The latter is often resistant to a multitude of medication and is, therefore, very hard to treat. In 2002, our group developed a technique for the endoscopic sphenopalatine ganglion block that was able to ameliorate the symptoms in 55% of drug-resistant chronic CH patients. This paper is intended as an update on the technique as well as a comparison in effectiveness to our prior approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leone M, Franzini A, Cecchini AP et al (2009) Cluster headache: pharmacological treatment and neurostimulation. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 5:153–162
Goadsby PJ (2002) Pathophysiology of cluster headache: a trigeminal autonomic cephalgia. Lancet Neurol 1:251–257
van Kleef M, Lataster A, Narouze S et al (2009) Evidence-based interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses. 2. Cluster headache. Pain Pract 9:435–442
Leone M, Bussone G (2008) Pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Lancet Neurol 8:755–764
Felisati G, Arnone F, Lozza P et al (2006) Sphenopalatine endoscopic ganglion block: a revision of a traditional technique for cluster headache. Laryngoscope 116:1447–1450
Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edn. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160
Prasanna A, Murthy PS (1993) Sphenopalatine ganglion block under vision using rigid nasal sinuscope. Reg Anesth 18:139–140
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pipolo, C., Bussone, G., Leone, M. et al. Sphenopalatine endoscopic ganglion block in cluster headache: a reevaluation of the procedure after 5 years. Neurol Sci 31 (Suppl 1), 197–199 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0325-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0325-2