Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Italian multicentre study of peroneal mononeuropathy: multiperspective follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to assess the course of peroneal mononeuropathy (PM). The study design includes Clinical and Prospective study. The setting involves neurophysiological Service. From November 2002 to January 2004, we enroled 69 consecutive patients and prospectively followed up 49 patients with multiple measurements. Comparison was made between follow-up and baseline values, and baseline factors were used to predict the PM evolution in multiple regression analysis. At follow-up, we observed a significant improvement of all clinical, neurophysiological and disability measurements, and physical aspects of quality of life (QoL). Greater muscle strength of tibialis anterior and higher conduction velocity of peroneal nerve at baseline were seen to be positive prognostic factors. A better evolution of mental aspects of QoL was observed in the subacute group and in younger patients, while a better physical evolution in QoL was observed in women. Rehabilitation is ambiguously associated with a better Deambulation Index but lower ratings in mental aspects of QoL. In conclusion, PM shows a positive spontaneous course and rehabilitation seems to help the recovery of deambulation. Further studies on the effects of conventional rehabilitation are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thoma A, Fawcett S, Ginty M et al (2001) Decompression of the common peroneal nerve: experience with 20 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1183–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL et al (2004) Management and outcomes in 318 operative common peroneal nerve lesions at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. Neurosurgery 54:1421–1428 (discussion 1428–1429)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garozzo D, Ferraresi S, Buffatti P (2004) Surgical treatment of common peroneal nerve injuries: indications and results. A series of 62 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 48:105–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aprile I, Padua L, Padua R et al (2000) Peroneal mononeuropathy: predisposing factors, and clinical and neurophysiological relationships. Neurol Sci 21:367–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aprile I, Caliandro P, Giannini F et al (2005) Italian multicentre study of peroneal mononeuropathy at the fibular head: study design and preliminary results. Acta Neurochir Suppl 92:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aprile I, Caliandro P, La Torre G et al (2005) Multicenter study of peroneal mononeuropathy: clinical, neurophysiological, and quality of life assessment. J Peripher Nerv Syst 10:259–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Medical Research Council (1976) Aids to the examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. Memorandum n. 45. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (1999) Guidelines for outcome studies in electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve Suppl 8:S277–S286

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E et al (2001) Cross-cultural adaptation of the lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease. Spine 26:E344–E347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N, Cabot R et al (1989) Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical therapist’s predictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:95–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaing YH, Chang MC, Liu Y et al (2000) Surgical treatment for peroneal nerve palsy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 63:591–597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Aprile.

Additional information

“Italian CTS and other entrapments Study Group”, members/centres: I Aprile, Fondazione Don C. Gnocchi, Roma; G Bogliun, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza; A Colleluori, Neurophysiology Service, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano; F Giannini, Department of Neurosciences, University of Siena; A Insola, Neurophysiopathology, Orthopaedic Trauma Centre, Roma; G Marfia, Institute of Neurology, University of Tor Vergata, Roma; A Morini, Operative Unit of Neurology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento; M Mondelli, EMG Service ASL 7, Siena; D Murasecco, Neurology, University of Perugia; L Padua, Department of Neuroscience—Institute of Neurology, Università Cattolica, Roma; M Romano, Neurophysiopathology, Villa Sofia CTO, Palermo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aprile, I., Tonali, P., Caliandro, P. et al. Italian multicentre study of peroneal mononeuropathy: multiperspective follow-up. Neurol Sci 30, 37–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0010-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0010-5

Keywords

Navigation