Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Charcot-Marie-Tooth and pain: correlations with neurophysiological, clinical, and disability findings

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pain is not considered a relevant symptom in Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) patients and no studies have comprehensively assessed it. We performed a multidimensional assessment in 211 consecutive CMT patients to evaluate the clinical features, quality of life (QoL) and disability. For QoL we used the SF-36, which comprises one domain called “Bodily Pain” (BP), which is a generic measure of intensity of pain. Results showed that pain is a relevant symptom related to gender, CMT subtypes, clinical picture, disability, and mildly to neurophysiological impairment. In our study the importance of pain was an occasional finding. Because of the study design we are not able to ascertain if pain is primarily due to the neuropathy or if it is due to the muscoloskeletal deformities arising as a consequence of the neuropathy. Our study underlined that pain should be considered as a relevant symptom in CMT patients and further studies should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Pareyson D (1999) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies: molecular basis for distinction and diagnosis. Muscle Nerve 22:1498–1509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Padua L, Aprile I, Cavallaro T et al (2006) Variables influencing quality of life and disability in Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) patients: Italian multicentre study. Neurol Sci 27:417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen ME, Marino RJ (2000) The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:S21–S29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42:703–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N, Cabot R et al (1989) Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical therapists’ predictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:95–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vinci P, Serrao M, Millul A et al (2005) Quality of life in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurology 65:922–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Padua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padua, L., Cavallaro, T., Pareyson, D. et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth and pain: correlations with neurophysiological, clinical, and disability findings. Neurol Sci 29, 193–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0935-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0935-0

Keywords

Navigation