Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migraine with and without aura: a single entity?

  • Headache Controversies
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A debate has been going on for many years about whether migraine with aura and migraine without aura are part of the same disorder or should instead be considered as two separate disorders. Although no final consensus has yet been reached on this issue, many clinical and pathogenetic elements suggest that the second option is true. Clinically, migraine with aura and migraine without aura are differentiated by epidemiological features, the characteristics of the headache phase, patient behaviour during attacks, natural history, age at onset and age at resolution, the recurrence pattern of attacks, favouring circumstances and trigger factors, correlation to female reproductive events, comorbidity and preventive therapies. Moreover, several literature reports suggest a possible different pathogenetic basis for the two forms of migraine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziegler DK (1985) The headache symptom. How many entities? Arch Neurol 42:273–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalessio DJ (1985) Is there a difference between classic and common migraine? What is migraine after all? Arch Neurol 42:275–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hachinski V (1985) Common and classic migraine. One or two entities? Arch Neurol 42:277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson M, Blau JN (1985) Are classical and common migraine different entities? Headache 25:211–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olesen J (1985) Are classical and common migraine different entities? Headache 25:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olesen J, Larsen B, Lauritzen M (1981) Focal hyperemia followed by spreading oligemia and impaired activation of rCBF in classic migraine. Ann Neurol 9:344–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Henriksen L, Larsen B (1981) The common migraine attack may not be initiated by cerebral ischaemia. Lancet 2:438–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R et al (2007) The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia; 27:193–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manzoni GC, Stovner LJ (2008) Epidemiology of headache. In: Nappi G, Moskowitz MA (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, 3rd series. Elsevier, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen BK, Olesen J (1992). Migraine with aura and migraine without aura: an epidemiological study. Cephalalgia 12:221–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell MB, Ulrich V, Gervil M, Olesen J (2002) Migraine without aura and migraine with aura are distinct disorders. A population-based twin survey. Headache 42:332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher CM (1986) Late-life migraine accompaniments — further experience. Stroke 17:1033–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nappi G, Manzoni GC (2005) Manuale delle cefalee. Masson, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manzoni GC, Farina S, Lanfranchi M, Solari A (1985) Classic migraine. Clinical findings in 164 patients. Eur Neurol 24:163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Manzoni GC, Farina S, Granella F et al (1986) Classic and common migraine. Suggestive clinical evidence of two separate entities. Funct Neurol 1:112–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Breslau N, Schultz LR, Stewart WF et al (2000) Headache and major depression: is it the association specific to migraine? Neurology 54:308–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Breslau N (1998) Psychiatric comorbidity in migraine. Cephalalgia 18[Suppl 22]:56–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tzourio C, Iglesias S, Hubert JB et al (1993) Migraine and risk of ischaemic stroke: a case-control study. BMJ 307:289–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carolei A, Marini C, De Matteis G (1996) History of migraine and risk of cerebral ischaemia in young adults. Lancet 347:1503–1506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N (1999) Migraine and stroke in young women: case-control study. BMJ 318:13–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Domitrz I, Mieszkowski J, Kamińska A (2007) Relationship between migraine and patent foramen ovale: a study of 121 patients with migraine. Headache 47:1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 8[Suppl 7]:1–96

    Google Scholar 

  23. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 2nd Edition. Cephalalgia 24:1–160

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chronicle EP, Pearson AJ, Mulleners WM (2006) Objective assessment of cortical excitability in migraine with and without aura. Cephalalgia 26:801–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Camillo Manzoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manzoni, G.C., Torelli, P. Migraine with and without aura: a single entity?. Neurol Sci 29 (Suppl 1), 40–43 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0884-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0884-7

Keywords

Navigation