Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in the use of spatial cues in two avian brood parasites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shiny and screaming cowbirds are avian interspecific brood parasites that locate and prospect host nests in daylight and return from one to several days later to lay an egg during the pre-dawn twilight. Thus, during nest location and prospecting, both location information and visual features are available, but the latter become less salient in the low-light conditions when the nests are visited for laying. This raises the question of how these different sources of information interact, and whether this reflects different behavioural specializations across sexes. Differences are expected, because in shiny cowbirds, females act alone, but in screaming cowbirds, both sexes make exploratory and laying nest visits together. We trained females and males of shiny and screaming cowbird to locate a food source signalled by both colour and position (cues associated), and evaluated performance after displacing the colour cue to make it misleading (cues dissociated). There were no sex or species differences in acquisition performance while the cues were associated. When the colour cue was relocated, individuals of both sexes and species located the food source making fewer visits to non-baited wells than expected by chance, indicating that they all retained the position as an informative cue. In this phase, however, shiny cowbird females, but not screaming, outperformed conspecific males, visiting fewer non-baited wells before finding the food location and making straighter paths in the search. These results are consistent with a greater reliance on spatial memory, as expected from the shiny cowbird female’s specialization on nest location behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from Figshare Digital Repository, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12152316.

Code availability

The R scripts generated for analysis presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

JLM was supported by a fellowship from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). JCR is Research Fellow of CONICET. This manuscript has been greatly improved thanks to the suggestions of Associate Editor, N Miller, and two anonymous reviewers. We thank M Corral for the assistance in the experiments with shiny cowbirds, RO Gómez for helping with Fig. 1 and D Rodríguez and G Cueto for statistical advice. We are also grateful to C Barbato, LA Ciancio and ELPE SRL for donating different supplies.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020170100521BA) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2015-1628).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimena Lois-Milevicich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Ethical approval

All work complied with Argentinean law and was undertaken with permission from Dirección Nacional de Fauna Silvestre from Argentina.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lois-Milevicich, J., Kacelnik, A. & Reboreda, J.C. Sex differences in the use of spatial cues in two avian brood parasites. Anim Cogn 24, 205–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01434-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01434-8

Keywords

Navigation