Skip to main content
Log in

The role of learning in risk-avoidance strategies during spider–ant interactions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive abilities used by arthropods, particularly predators, when interacting in a natural context have been poorly studied. Two neotropical sympatric predators, the golden silk spider Nephila clavipes and the ectatommine ant Ectatomma tuberculatum, were observed in field conditions where their interactions occurred regularly due to the exploitation of the same patches of vegetation. Repeated presentations of E. tuberculatum workers ensnared in their web triggered a progressive decrease in the capture response of N. clavipes. All the spiders that stopped trying to catch the ant on the second and/or third trial were individuals that had been bitten during a previous trial. Behavioural tests in natural field conditions showed that after a single confrontation with ant biting, spiders were able to discriminate this kind of prey more quickly from a defenceless prey (fruit flies) and to selectively and completely suppress their catching response. This one-trial aversive learning was still effective after 24 h. Likewise, E. tuberculatum workers entangled once on a N. clavipes web and having succeeded in escaping, learned to escape more quickly, breaking through the web by preferentially cutting spiral threads (sticky traps) rather than radial threads (stronger structural unsticky components) or pursuing the cutting of radials but doing it more quickly. Both strategies, based on a one-trial learning capability, obviously minimize the number of physical encounters between the two powerful opponents and may enhance their fitness by diminishing the risk of potential injuries resulting from predatory interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balfour RA, Buddle CM, Rypstra AL, Walker SE, Marshall SD (2003) Ontogenetic shifts in competitive interactions and intra-guild predation between two wolf spider species. Ecol Entomol 28:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum MR, Miliczky E (1984) Mantids and milkweed bugs: efficacy of aposematic coloration against invertebrate predators. Am Midl Nat 111:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA (1993) Aversion learning and feeding. In: Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman-Chiswell BT, Kulinski MM, Muscat RL, Nguyen KA, Norton BA, Symonds MRE, Westhorpe GE, Elgar MA (2004) Web-building spiders attract prey by storing decaying matter. Naturwissenschaften 91:245–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowdish TI, Bultman TL (1993) Visual cues used by mantids in learning aversion to aposematically colored prey. Am Midl Nat 129:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED III, Brodie ED Jr (1999) Predator-prey arms races: asymmetrical selection on predators and prey may be reduced when prey are dangerous. Bioscience 49:557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower JVZ, Brower LP (1965) Experimental studies of mimicry. 8. Further investigation of honeybees (Apis mellifera) and their dronefly mimics (Eristalis spp.). Am Nat 99:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt GM, Wilcoxon HC, Czaplicki JA (1973) Conditioning in garter snakes: aversion to palatable prey induced by delayed illness. Anim Learn Behav 1:317–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti plains: group living in an asocial species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Stoner C (2003) The potential for interspecific competition among African carnivores. Biol Conserv 110:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos L, Hénaut Y, Legal L (2005) Foraging strategies of Eriophora edax (Aranae, Araneidae): a nocturnal orb-weaving spider. J Arachnol 33:509–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Chameron S, Schatz B, Pastergue-Ruiz I, Beugnon G, Collett TS (1998) The learning of a sequence of visual patterns by the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2309–2313

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland MR (2001) Ability of predatory native Australian fishes to learn to avoid toxic larvae of the introduced toad Bufo marinus. J Fish Biol 59:319–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1976) The ethology of predation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Darmaillacq AS, Dickel L, Chichery MP, Agin V, Chichery R (2004) Rapid taste aversion learning in adult cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav 68:1291–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Krebs JR (1979) Predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 21–151

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cock R, Matthysen E (2003) Glow-worm larvae bioluminescence (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) operates as an aposematic signal upon toads (Bufo bufo). Behav Ecol 14:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Mora A, Pérez-Lachaud G, Lachaud J-P (2008) Mandible strike: the lethal weapon of Odontomachus opaciventris against small prey. Behav Process 78:64–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A (1988) Memory effect on predatory behaviour of Odontomachus troglodytes (Formicidae-Ponerinae). Behaviour 107:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Lachaud J-P (1992) Growth-related changes in predation behavior in incipient colonies of the ponerine ant Ectatomma tuberculatum (Olivier). Insect Soc 39:129143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Corbara B, Oliva-Rivera J (1990) Mise en évidence d’une forme d’apprentissage dans le comportement de capture des proies chez Pachycondyla (= Neoponera) villosa (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Behaviour 115:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Lachaud J-P, Beugnon G (1993) Efficiency in the exploitation of patchy environments by the ponerine ant Paltothyreus tarsatus: an ecological consequence of the flexibility of prey capture behavior. J Ethol 11:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond H, Macías Garcia C (1995) Congenital responsiveness of garter snakes to a dangerous prey abolished by learning. Anim Behav 49:891–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1988) Memory of distances and directions moved as cues during temporary construction in the spider Leucauge mariana (Araneae: Araneidae). J Insect Behav 1:51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards GB, Jackson RR (1994) The role of experience in the development of predatory behaviour in Phidippus regius, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Florida. N Z J Zool 21:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T (1965) Defensive spray of a phasmid insect. Science 148:966–968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Meinwald J (1966) Defensive secretions of arthropods. Science 153:1341–1350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes WK, Skinner BF (1941) Some quantitative properties of anxiety. J Exp Psychol 29:390–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Godzinska EJ (1989) Rapid learning of a new prey type in the ants. Abstracts 21st international ethological conference, Utrecht, pp 69

  • Gosselink TE, Van Deelen TR, Joselyn MG, Warner RE (2003) Temporal habitat partitioning and spatial use of coyotes and red foxes in east-central Illinois. J Wildl Manage 67:90–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Grober MS (1988) Brittle-star bioluminescence functions as an aposematic signal to deter crustacean predators. Anim Behav 36:493–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavson CR, Garcia J, Hankins WG, Rusiniak KW (1974) Coyote predation control by aversive conditioning. Science 184:581–583

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CS (1934) Emotional behavior in the rat. I. Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. J Comp Psychol 18:385–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Taniguchi Y (1996) Behavioral discrimination of prey with various defense mechanisms by the lizard Eumeces okadae. J Ethol 14:89–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MW, Slotow R (2009) Temporal partitioning of activity in large African carnivores: tests of multiple hypotheses. South Afr J Wildl Res 39:109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM, Herberstein ME (1999) The role of experience in web-building spiders (Araneidae). Anim Cogn 2:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Machkour-M’Rabet S (2010) Interspecific aggregation around the web of the orb spider Nephila clavipes: consequences for the web architecture of Leucauge venusta. Ethol Ecol Evol 22:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Alauzet C, Dargagnon D, Lambin M (1999) Visual learning in larval Orius majusculus a polyphagous predator. Entomol Exp Appl 90:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Alauzet C, Ferran A, Williams T (2000) Effect of nymphal diet on adult predation behavior in Orius majusculus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). J Econ Entomol 93:252–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Pablo J, Ibarra-Nuñez G, Williams T (2001) Retention, capture and consumption of experimental prey by orb-web weaving spiders in coffee plantations of Southern Mexico. Entomol Exp Appl 98:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Delme J, Legal L, Williams T (2005) Host selection by a kleptobiotic spider. Naturwissenschaften 92:95–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hénaut Y, Machkour-M’Rabet S, Winterton P, Calmé S (2010) Insect attraction by webs of Nephila clavipes (Araneae: Nephilidae). J Arachnol 38:135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberstein ME, Gaskett AC, Glencross D, Hart S, Jeansch S, Elgar MA (2000) Does the presence of potential prey affect web design in Argiope keyserlingi (Araneae, Araneidae)? J Arachnol 28:346–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins L (2007) Juveniles Nephila (Araneae, Nephilidae) use various attack strategies for novel prey. J Arachnol 35:530–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoback WW, Higley LG, Stanley DW (2001) Tigers eating tigers: evidence of intraguild predation operating in an assemblage of tiger beetles. Ecol Entomol 26:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1980) Canopy orientation: a new kind of orientation in ants. Science 210:86–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant. Anim Behav 59:433–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Núñez G, García JA, López JA, Lachaud J-P (2001) Prey analysis in the diet of some ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and web-building spiders (Araneae) in coffee plantations in Chiapas, Mexico. Sociobiology 37:723–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Li D (2004) One-encounter search-image formation by araneophagic spiders. Anim Cogn 7:247–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard SD (1996) Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Annu Rev Entomol 41:287–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard S, Cerveira AM (2002a) Opportunistic use of cognitive smokescreens by araneophagic jumping spiders. Anim Cogn 5:147–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard SD, Li D, Fijn N (2002b) Interpopulation variation in the risk-related decisions of Portia labiata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), during predatory sequences with spitting spiders. Anim Cogn 5:215–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffé K, Ramos C, Lagalla C, Parra L (1990) Orientation cues used by ants. Insect Soc 37:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1986) Web-site selection: are we asking the right questions? In: Shear WA (ed) Spiders—webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA (1991) Learning, memory, and foraging efficiency in two species of desert seed-harvester ants. Ecology 72:1408–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamler JF, Ballard WB, Gilliland RL, Lemons PR, Mote K (2003) Impacts of coyotes on swift foxes in northwestern Texas. J Wildl Manage 67:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse KC, Stone BM (1984) Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) learn to avoid feeding on toad (Bufo) tadpoles. Anim Behav 32:1035–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaud J-P, López Méndez JA, Schatz B, de Carli P, Beugnon G (1996) Comparaison de l’impact de prédation de deux ponérines du genre Ectatomma dans un agroécosystème néotropical. Actes Coll Insect Soc 10:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolfa MA, Barth FG (1996) Vibrations in the orb web of the spider Nephila clavipes: cues for discrimination and orientation. J Comp Physiol A 179:493–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Metzker K (1998) Food avoidance learning in squirrel monkeys and common marmosets. Learn Mem 5:193–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenson MK (1995) Implications of high offspring mortality for cheetah population dynamics. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell JDC, Strand O (2000) Interference interactions, co-existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores. Divers Distrib 6:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe WC, O’Boyle M (1976) Suppression of cricket killing and eating in laboratory mice following lithium chloride injections. Physiol Behav 17:427–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macquart D, Latil G, Beugnon G (2008) Sensorimotor sequence learning in the ant Gigantiops destructor. Anim Behav 75:1693–1701

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton SM, Harding JP (1964) Mandibular mechanisms and the evolution of arthropods. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 247:1–183

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn TP, Hoover JR, Jasper GS, Kelly MS, Polis AM, Spangler CM, Watson BJ (2002) Resource heterogeneity affects demography of the Costa Rican ant Aphaenogaster araneoides. J Trop Ecol 18:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers JJ, Herrel A (2005) Prey capture kinematics of ant-eating lizards. J Exp Biol 208:113–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BD, Banks PB (2005) Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Austral Ecol 30:581–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus LK, Cassel JF, Carlson RB, Gustavson CR (1983) Taste-aversion conditioning of crows to control predation on eggs. Science 220:212–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S (1996) Dragonflies (Gynacantha nervosa Rambur) avoid wasps (Polybia aequatorialis Zavattari and Myschocyttarus sp.) as prey. J Insect Behav 9:159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Okano S, Nagaya H, Inatomi N (2005) Novelty stress increases fecal pellet output in Mongolian gerbils: effects of several drugs. J Pharmacol Sci 98:411–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 153:492–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Delibes M (1994) Spatio-temporal ecology and behavior of European genets in southwestern Spain. J Mammal 75:714–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastergue-Ruiz I, Beugnon G, Lachaud J-P (1995) Can the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) encode global landmark–landmark relationships in addition to isolated landmark-goal relationships? J Insect Behav 81:15–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CL (1988) Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in laval dragonflies. Oecologia 77:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrewicz AT, Kamil AC (1979) Search image formation in the blue jay (Cyanoccitta cristata). Science 204:1332–1333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrewicz AT, Richards JB (1985) Learning to forage: an ecological perspective. In: Johnston TD, Pietrewicz AT (eds) Issues in the ecological study of learning. Lawrence Eribaum Association Incorporation, London, pp 99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, McCormick SJ (1987) Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology 68:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Robinson MH (1990) Predator-prey interactions, informational complexity, and the origins of intelligence. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO (eds) Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche-Labarbe N, Beugnon G, Lachaud J-P (2004) Apprentissage de routes et orientation spatiale chez un insecte sur un support en 3 dimensions. Actes Coll Insect Soc 16:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL, Gamboa E (2000) Memory of captured prey in three web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae, Linyphiidae, Tetragnathidae). Anim Cogn 3:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper TJ, Redston S (1987) Conspicuousness of distasteful prey affects the strength and durability of one-trial avoidance learning. Anim Behav 35:739–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz B, Lachaud J-P (2008) Effect of high nest density on spatial relationships in two dominant ectatommine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51:623–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz B, Beugnon G, Lachaud J-P (1994) Time-place learning by an invertebrate, the ant Ectatomma ruidum Roger. Anim Behav 48:236–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz B, Lachaud J-P, Beugnon G (1999) Spatio-temporal learning by the ant Ectatomma ruidum. J Exp Biol 202:1897–1907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JO (1982) Biochemistry of insect venoms. Ann Rev Entomol 27:339–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss P, Cheng K (2013) Finding food: outbound searching behavior in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol 24:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Hiraldo F (2008) Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: a review. Ibis 150:132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Skow CD, Jakob EM (2006) Jumping spiders attend to context during learned avoidance of aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 17:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE, Hurd LE (1995) Egg-hatch phenology and intraguild predation between two mantid species. Oecologia 104:496–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller DA (1984) Seasonal reversal of competitive advantage between two spider species. Oecologia 64:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann JE (2009) An ethological perspective on defecation as an integral part of anti-predatory behaviour in the grey partridge (Perdix perdix L.) at night. J Ethol 27:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft S, Wise DH (1999) Behavioral and ecophysiological responses of a generalist predator to single and mixed species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanak AT (2008) Intraguild interactions between native and domestic carnivores in Central India. Ph.D thesis, Faculty of Graduate School, University of Missouri

  • Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphys (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol A 142:315–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MR (2006) Defecation behaviour and ecology of insects. Ann Rev Entomol 51:635–661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welzl H, D’Alamo P, Lipp HP (2001) Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigm. Behav Brain Res 125:205–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman DW, Blum MS, Jones CG (1986) Olfactory mediated attack suppression in the southern grasshopper mouse toward an unpalatable prey. Behav Process 13:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger S, McGrady J (1993) Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects on shared prey. Ecology 74:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Zschokke S (1999) Nomenclature of the orb-web. J Arachnol 27:542–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Zschokke S, Hénaut Y, Benjamin SP, García-Ballinas JA (2006) Prey-capture strategies in sympatric web-building spiders. Can J Zool 84:964–973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for access to the field site granted by the INIFAP Rosario Izapa (Chiapas, Mexico). They are also grateful to Peter Winterton for assistance with the English manuscript, to Javier Valle Mora and Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud for statistical advice, and to Ken Cheng and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and useful suggestions on a previous version of this manuscript. The experiments described in this paper comply with the current laws of Mexico.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Hénaut.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Video 1. Spider captures a fly during the first trial (slow motion; speed divided by 4) (MPG 2250 kb)

Video 2. Spider cuts its web to evacuate the ant after having been bitten during a previous trial (MPG 1992 kb)

Video 3. Spider’s reaction immediately after being bitten by an ant (MPG 2318 kb)

Video 4. Spider catching an ant from behind to avoid the possibility of injury (MPG 1282 kb)

Video 5. Ant in the web wriggling and cutting threads (MPG 5830 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hénaut, Y., Machkour-M’Rabet, S. & Lachaud, JP. The role of learning in risk-avoidance strategies during spider–ant interactions. Anim Cogn 17, 185–195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0651-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0651-x

Keywords

Navigation