Skip to main content
Log in

Shape discrimination and concept formation in the jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated whether jungle crows can learn concepts by using printouts of shapes in a simultaneous two-alternative task. Jungle crows were first trained with a red triangle and red square until they reached the discrimination criterion (80 % of correct choices in two blocks of 10 trials each). Then, we tested crows with successive transfer tests to investigate both the discrimination cues being used and concept formation ability, by using novel triangular and non-triangular stimuli. All of the jungle crows learnt to discriminate between the triangle and square during training. The discrimination performance was generally not affected either by changes in the colour of the stimuli or when both shape and colour cues conflicted, with the previously non-rewarded shape but matching colour (red square) versus rewarded shape but non-matching colour (green triangle). The use of only outlines of the familiar stimuli also did not affect discrimination behaviour of crows. In addition, crows significantly discriminated novel triangular shapes during the limited trials given, suggesting their ability to form the concept of triangularity. However, failure to discriminate when the novel stimuli size deviated from the original suggests that there is a limit to shape concept formation in a familiar–novel context in the jungle crow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astley SL, Peissig JJ, Wasserman EA (2001) Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 27:252–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BA (1979) Operant studies on shape discrimination in goats. Physiol Behav 23:455–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BA (1981) Shape discrimination in sheep and calves. Anim Behav 29:830–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt RS, Wasserman EA, Reynolds WF, Knauss KS (1988) Conceptual behavior in pigeons: categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogale BA, Aoyama M, Sugita S (2011a) Categorical learning between ‘male’ and ‘female’ photographic human faces in jungle crows (Corvus macrorhynchos). Behav Process 86:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogale BA, Kamata N, Mioko K, Sugita S (2011b) Quantity discrimination in jungle crows (Corvus machrorhynchos). Anim Behav 82:635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnotka J, Gunturkun O, Rehkamper G, Gray RD, Hunt GR (2008) Extraordinary large brains in tool-using new caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides). Neurosc Let 433:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG, Wright AA, Kendrick DF (1990) Visual categorization by pigeons. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn S, Mumford D (eds) Quant anal of behav, vol 8., Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formationLawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 187–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodwell PC (1957) Shape recognition in rats. Br J Psychol 48:221–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emery NJ (2006) Cognitive ornithology: the evolution of avian intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc B 361:23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306:1903–1907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Zhang S, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan MV (2001) The concepts of `sameness’ and `difference’ in an insect. Nature 410:930–933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow HF (1944) Studies in discrimination learning by monkeys. I. The learning of discrimination series and the reversal of discrimination series. J Gener Psychol 30:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1979) Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 5:116–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, DeVilliers PA (1980) Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 14. Academic Press, New York, pp 59–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch JA, Kabanova A, Güntürkün O (2008) Grouping of artificial objects in pigeons: an inquiry into the cognitive architecture of an avian mind. Brain Res Bull 75:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva OF, Freiburger KL, Wasserman EA (2004) Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels. Psychon Bull Rev 11:1111–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minini L, Jeffery KJ (2006) Do rats use shape to solve “shape discrimination”? Learning Memory 13:287–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peissig JJ, Kimberly K, Young ME, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (2006) Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 32:419–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds GS (1961) Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 4:203–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8:382–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sappington BF, Goldman L (1994) Discrimination learning and concept formation in the Arabian horse. J Anim Sci 72:3080–3087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simrnova AA, Lazareva OF, Zorina ZA (2000) Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. J Exp Anal Behav 73:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka M (2001) Discrimination and categorization of photographs of natural objects by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 4:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towe AL (1954) A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. J Compa Physiol Psychol 47:283–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troje NF, Huber L, Loidolt M, Aust U, Fieder M (1999) Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli. Vis Res 39:353–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk J, MacDonald SE (2002) Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction. J Exp Anal Behav 78:315–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Kiedinger RE, Bhatt RS (1988) Conceptual behavior in pigeons: categories, sub-categories, and pseudocategories. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, DeVolder CL, Coppage DJ (1992) Non-similarity based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychol Sci 6:374–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (2010) Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. Anim Cogn 13(1):75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Mackintosh NJ, Boakes RA (1985) Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeons and corvids. Quart J Exp Psychol 37:313–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Wasserman EA, Lazareva OF, Thompson RKR, Rattermann MJ (2008) Concept learning in Animals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 3:13–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by a Grant for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 23248053), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Foreign Researchers (No. P12413) and a Grant for Scientific Research from Utsunomiya University Center for Optical Research and Education.

Ethical standard

Permits to trap jungle crows were obtained from Niiza city (permit for the catching of wild animals No. 01-02) and from the Tochigi prefecture (No. 0010). Permit to conduct the study was obtained from Utsunomiya University, and all procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at Utsunomiya University (No. A10-0007).

Conflict of interest

We the authors of this paper entitled ‘Shape discrimination and concept formation in the jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos)’ hereby declare that we do not have a financial relationship and that there is no conflict of interest with any of the organizations that sponsored this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoei Sugita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogale, B.A., Sugita, S. Shape discrimination and concept formation in the jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos). Anim Cogn 17, 105–111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0642-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0642-y

Keywords

Navigation