Abstract
Displaced reference is the ability to refer to an item that has been moved (displaced) in space and/or time, and has been called one of the true hallmarks of referential communication. Several studies suggest that nonhuman primates have this capability, but a recent experiment concluded that in a specific situation (absent entities), human infants display displaced reference but chimpanzees do not. Here, we show that chimpanzees and bonobos of diverse rearing histories are capable of displaced reference to absent and displaced objects. It is likely that some of the conflicting findings from animal cognition studies are due to relatively minor methodological differences, but are compounded by interpretation errors. Comparative studies are of great importance in elucidating the evolution of human cognition; however, greater care must be taken with methodology and interpretation for these studies to accurately reflect species differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boesch C (2007) What makes us human (Homo sapiens)? The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison. J Comp Psychol 121:227–240. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.3.227
Boesch C (2008) Taking development and ecology seriously when comparing cognition: reply to Tomasello and Call (2008). J Comp Psychol 122:453–455. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.453
Brakke KE, Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1996) The development of language skills in Pan-II. Production. Lang Commun 16:361–380
Bulloch MJ, Boysen ST, Furlong EE (2008) Visual attention and its relation to knowledge states in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 76:1147–1155
Call J (2001) Chimpanzee social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 5:388–393
Clark H (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cronk L (2004) Continuity, displaced reference, and deception. Behav Brain Sci 27:510–511. doi:10.1017/s0140525x04300117
Deák GO, Flom RA, Pick AD (2000) Effects of gesture and target on 12- and 18-month-olds’ joint visual attention to objects in front of or behind them. Dev Psychol 36:511–523. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.511
Enfield NJ (2001) Lip-pointing: a discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture 1:185–212
Enfield NJ, Kita S, De Ruiter JP (2007) Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. J Pragmat 39:1722–1741. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.001
Furlong EE, Boose KJ, Boysen ST (2008) Raking it in: the impact of enculturation on chimpanzee tool use. Anim Cogn 11:83–97
Gardner RA, Gardner BT, Van Cantfort TE (1989) Teaching sign language to chimpanzees. State University of New York Press, Albany
Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2010) Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) show understanding of human attentional states when requesting food held by a human. Anim Cogn 13:87–92. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0248-6
Herman LM, Forestell PH (1985) Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin. Rutgers university symposium: the question of animal cognition (1985, New Brunswick, New Jersey). Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:667–681
Herrmann E, Call J, Hernandez-Lloreda MV et al (2007) Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317:1360–1366. doi:10.1126/science.1146282
Hockett CF (1960) The origin of speech. Sci Am 203:88–96
Hopkins WD, Taglialatela JP, Leavens DA (2007) Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Anim Behav 73:281–286
Horowitz AC (2003) Do humans ape? Or do apes human? Imitation and intention in humans (Homo sapiens) and other animals. J Comp Psychol 117:325–336
Hostetter AB, Russell JL, Freeman H, Hopkins WD (2007) Now you see me, now you don’t: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of eyes in attention. Anim Cogn 10:55–62
Leavens DA, Bard KA (2011) Environmental influences on joint attention in great apes: implications for human cognition. J Cogn Educ Psychol Special Issue on “Culture and Cognition” 10:9–31
Leavens DA, Hopkins WD, Bard KA (1996) Indexical and referential pointing in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:346–353
Leavens DA, Hopkins WD, Thomas R (2004) Referential communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 118:48–57
Leavens DA, Hopkins WD, Bard KA (2005) Understanding the point of chimpanzee pointing: epigenesis and ecological validity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:185–189
Leavens DA, Hopkins WD, Bard KA (2008) The heterochronic origins of explicit reference. In: Zlatev J, Racine T, Sinha C, Itkonen E (eds) The shared mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Leavens DA, Bard KA, Hopkins WD (2010a) BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee”. Commentary on target article by Henrich, Heine and Norenzayan, the weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 33:100–101
Leavens DA, Russell JL, Hopkins WD (2010b) Multimodal communication by captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 13:33–40. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0242-z
Liszkowski U, Schäfer M, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2009) Prelinguistic infants, but not chimpanzees, communicate about absent entities. Psychol Sci 20:654–660. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02346.x
Lyn H (2008) Artificial symbol systems in dolphins and apes: analogous communicative evolution or evidence for basic communicative rules? The evolution of language: proceedings of the 7th international conference (EVOLANG7)
Lyn H (2010) Environment, methodology, and the object choice task in apes: evidence for declarative comprehension and implications for the evolution of language. Evol Psychol 8:333–349. doi:10.1556/JEP.8.2010.4.3
Lyn H (2012) Apes and the evolution of language: taking stock of 40 years of research. In: Vonk J, Shackelford TK (eds) Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 356–378
Lyn H, Russell JL, Hopkins WD (2010) The impact of environment on the comprehension of declarative communication in apes. Psychol Sci 21:360–365. doi:10.1177/0956797610362218
Lyn H, Greenfield PM, Savage-Rumbaugh S et al (2011) Nonhuman primates do declare! A comparison of declarative symbol and gesture use in two children, two bonobos, and a chimpanzee. Lang Commun 31:63–74. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2010.11.001
Moore C, D’Entremont B (2001) Developmental changes in pointing as a function of attentional focus. J Cogn Dev 2:109–129. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0202_1
Morford JP, Goldin-Meadow S (1997) From here and now to there and then: the development of displaced reference in homesign and English. Child Dev 68:420–435. doi:10.2307/1131669
Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2009) The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 123:304–309. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016222
Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Pepperberg IM, Gordon JD (2005) Number comprehension by a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 119:197–209. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.197
Povinelli DJ, Bierschwale DT, Ĉech CG (1999) Comprehension of seeing as a referential act in young children, but not juvenile chimpanzees. Br J Dev Psychol 17:37–60. doi:10.1348/026151099165140
Rumbaugh DM (1977) Language learning by a chimpanzee: the Lana project. Commun Behav xxii:312
Russell JL, Lyn H, Schaeffer JA, Hopkins WD (2011) The role of socio-communicative rearing environments on the development of social and physical cognition in apes. Dev Sci 14:1459–1470
Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Boysen S (1978) Symbolic communication between two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Science 201:641–644
Savage-Rumbaugh ES, McDonald K, Sevcik RA et al (1986) Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). J Exp Psychol Gen 115:211–235
Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Murphy J, Sevcik RA et al (1993) Language comprehension in ape and child. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 58:v–221
Schusterman RJ, Gisiner R, Grimm BK, Hanggi EB (1993) Behavior control by exclusion and attempts at establishing semanticity in marine mammals using match-to-sample paradigms. In: Roitblat HL, Herman LM, Nachtigall PE (eds) Language and communication: comparative perspectives. Comparative cognition and neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, pp 249–274
Taglialatela JP, Russell JL, Schaeffer JA, Hopkins WD (2011) Chimpanzee vocal signaling points to a multimodal origin of human language. PLoS ONE 6:e18852. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018852
Thomas E, Murphy M, Pitt R et al (2008) Understanding of visual attention by adult humans (Homo sapiens): a partial replication of Povinelli, Bierschwale, and Ĉech (1999). J Comp Psychol 122:428–436. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.428
Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York
Tomasello M, Carpenter M (2005) The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 70:1–136
Whiten A, Custance DM, Gómez JC et al (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.3
Wilkins D (2003) Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In: Kita S (ed) Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 171–215
Woodruff G, Premack D (1979) Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: the development of deception. Cognition 7:333–362
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the staff at YNPRC and Bill Fields and the research staff at GATI for their assistance in data collection. American Psychological Association and Institute of Medicine guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals were adhered to during all phases of this study. Funding for this study was provided by NIH grants NS-42867, HD-56232, HD-60563 and The Leverhulme Trust F/00 678/O.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyn, H., Russell, J.L., Leavens, D.A. et al. Apes communicate about absent and displaced objects: methodology matters. Anim Cogn 17, 85–94 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0640-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0640-0