Abstract
Tool-using tasks that require subjects to overcome the obstacles to get a reward have been a major component of research investigating causal knowledge in primates. Much of the debate in this research has focused on whether subjects simply use certain stimulus features or instead use more functionally relevant information regarding the effect that certain features may have on a moving reward. Here, we presented two obstacle tasks, a trap platform and a barrier platform, to 22 great apes. Although perceptually similar, these two tasks contain two perceptually different but functionally equivalent obstacles: a trap and a barrier. In a pre-exposure phase, subjects either experienced an obstacle task or a task without any obstacle. In the transfer phase, all subjects were presented with an obstacle task, either the trap platform or the barrier platform. Our results show that those subjects who received an obstacle task prior to the second task performed better than those who first received a non-obstacle task. The type of obstacle task that subjects received first did not have any effect on their performance in the transfer phase. We suggest that apes possess some knowledge about the effects that obstacles have on slow-moving unsupported objects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bluff LA, Weir AAS, Rutz C, Wimpenny JH, Kacelnik A (2007) Tool-related cognition in New Caledonian crows. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2:1–2
Call J (2000) Representing space and objects in monkeys and apes. Cognitive Sci 24:397–422
Cunningham CL, Anderson JR, Mootnick AR (2006) Object manipulation to obtain a food reward in hoolock gibbons, Bunopithecus hoolock. Anim Behav 71:621–629
Fujita K, Kuroshima H, Asai S (2003) How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? J Exp Psychol Anim B 29:233–242
Girdnt A, Meier T, Call J (2008) Task constraints mask great apes’ ability to solve the trap table task. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 34:54–62
Liedtke J, Werdenich D, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2011) Big brains are not enough: performance of three parrot species in the trap-tube paradigm. Anim Cogn 14:143–149
Limongelli L, Boysen ST, Visalberghi E (1995) Comprehension of cause-effect relations in a tool-using task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 109:18–26
Martin-Ordas G, Call J (2009) Assessing generalization within and between trap tasks in the great apes. Int J Comp Psychol 22:43–60
Martin-Ordas G, Call J, Colmenares F (2008) Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks. Anim Cogn 11:423–430
Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2006) How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Anim Cogn 9:193–199
Penn DC, Povinelli DJ (2007) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Annu Rev Psychol 58(1):97–118
Penn DC, Holyoak KJ, Povinelli DJ (2008) Darwin’s mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behav Brain Sci 31:109–178
Povinelli DJ (2000) Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee’s theory of how the mind works. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Seed AM, Call J (2009) Causal knowledge for events and objects in animals. In: Watanabe S, Blaisdell AP, Huber L, Young A (eds) Rational animals, irrational humans. Keio University, Tokyo, pp 173–188
Seed AM, Tebbich S, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2006) Investigating physical cognition in rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Curr Biol 16:697–701
Seed AM, Call J, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2009) Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 35:23–34
Silva FJ, Silva KM (2006) Humans’ folk physics is not enough to explain variations in their tool-using behavior. Psychon Bull Rev 13:689–693
Silva FJ, Page DM, Silva KM (2005) Methodological-conceptual problems in the study of chimpanzees’ folk physics: how studies with adult humans can help. Learn Behav 33:47–58
Taylor AH, Hunt GR, Medina FS, Gray RD (2009) Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning? Proc R Soc B 276:247–254
Tebbich S, Bshary R (2004) Cognitive abilities related to tool use in the woodpecker finch, Cactospiza pallida. Anim Behav 67:689–697
Tebbich S, Seed AM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2007) Non-tool-using rooks (Corvus frigilegus) solve the trap-tube task. Anim Cogn 10:225–231
Teschke I, Tebbich S (2011) Physical cognition and tool-use: performance of Darwin’s finches in the two-trap tube task. Anim Cogn 14:555–563
Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York
Visalberghi E, Limongelli L (1994) Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 108:15–22
Visalberghi E, Tomasello M (1998) Primate causal understanding in the physical and psychological domains. Behav Process 42:189–203
Acknowledgments
Gema Martín-Ordas was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship of the “Programa de Ayuda a la Movilidad del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Micinn)”, Spain. We are also thankful to Kevin Kennedy and Richard Moore for proof reading of the manuscript. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0681-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin-Ordas, G., Jaek, F. & Call, J. Barriers and traps: great apes’ performance in two functionally equivalent tasks. Anim Cogn 15, 1007–1013 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0504-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0504-z