Abstract
Sound categorisation plays a crucial role for processing ecological and social stimuli in a species’ natural environment. To explore the discrimination and evaluation of sound stimuli in human babies and nonhuman primates, a reciprocal habituation-dishabituation paradigm has been successfully introduced into auditory research. We applied the reciprocal paradigm for the first time to a non-primate mammal, the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri), to examine to what extent non-primate mammals share the ability to evaluate communication calls with primates. Playback stimuli were three types of communication calls, differing distinctively in context and acoustic structure, as well as two artificial control sounds, differing solely in frequency. We assessed the attention towards the playback stimuli by the latency to respond to the test stimulus. Subjects evaluated pairs of communication call types as well as the artificial playback stimuli. Attention towards the test stimuli differed significantly in strength for one pair of communication calls, with subjects dishabituating faster to one category than the other. The comparison of a second pair of communication calls did not show significant differences. Interestingly, subjects also evaluated the artificial control sounds. Findings are only partly in line with results on human and non-human primates. They provided first evidence that in non-primate mammals acoustic evaluation is not solely affected by the sound-associated context but is also linked to unusualness and acoustic cues, such as peak frequency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bee MA (2003) Experience-based plasticity of acoustically evokes aggression in a territorial frog. J Comp Physiol A 189:485–496
Binz H, Zimmermann E (1989) The vocal repertoire of adult tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Behaviour 109:142–162
Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2004) Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to calls from juveniles. Anim Behav 68:1257–1265
Braune P, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E (2008) Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.). BMC Biol 6:19
Carter GG, Skowronski MD, Faure PA, Fenton FB (2008) Antiphonal calling allows individual discrimination in white-winged vampire bats. Anim Behav 76:1343–1355
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1988) Assessment of meaning and the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 36:477–486
Ehret G (2006) Common rules of communication sound perception. In: Kanwal JS, Ehret G (eds) Behaviour and neurodynamics for auditory communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–114
Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J (1971) Speech perception in infants. Science 22:303–306
Emmons LH (2000) Tupaia: a field study of Bornean tree shrews. University of California Press, Berkley
Fischer J (1998) Barbary macaques categorize shrill barks into two call types. Anim Behav 55:799–807
Fischer J, Metz M, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2001) Baboon responses to graded bark variants. Anim Behav 61:925–931
Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav R 25:355–373
Gifford GW, Hauser MD, Cohen YE (2003) Discrimination of functionally referential calls by laboratory-housed rhesus macaques: implications for neuroethological studies. Brain Behav Evolut 61:213–224
Hare JF (1999) Juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels, Spermophilus richardsonii, discriminate among individual alarm callers. Anim Behav 55:451–460
Hauber ME, Pearson HE, Reh A, Merges A (2002) Discrimination between host songs by brood parasitic brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Anim Cogn 5:129–137
Hauser MD (1998) Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 55:1647–1658
Hauser MD (2007) When males call, females listen: sex differences in responsiveness to rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta, copulation calls. Anim Behav 73:1059–1065
Hauser MD, Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Patalano AL (2002) Spontaneous number discrimination of multi-format auditory stimuli in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition 86:B23–B32
Janečka JE, Miller W, Pringle TH et al (2007) Molecular and genomic data identify the closest living relatives of primates. Science 318:792–794
Kazial KA, Kenny TL, Burnett SC (2008) Little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) recognize individual identity of conspecifics using sonar calls. Ethology 114:469–478
Leslie AM (1982) The perception of causality in infants. Perception 11:173–186
Maros K, Pongrácz P, Bárdos G, Molnár C, Faragó T, Miklósi Á (2008) Dogs can discriminate barks from different situations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114:159–167
Martin RD (1968) Reproduction and ontogeny in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri) with references to their general behaviour and taxonomic relationships. Z Tierpsychol 25:409–495
Pegg JE, Werker JF, McLeod PJ (1992) Preference for infant-directed over adult-directed speech: evidence from 7-week-old infants. Infant behav dev 15:325–345
Rendall D, Rodman PS, Emond RE (1996) Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 51:1007–1015
Rendall D, Owren MJ, Ryan MJ (2009) What do animal signals mean? Anim Behav 78:233–240
Schehka S, Zimmermann E (2009) Acoustic features to arousal and identity in disturbance calls of tee shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Behav Brain Res 203:223–231
Schehka S, Esser K-H, Zimmermann E (2007) Acoustical expression of arousal in conflict situations in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). J Comp Physiol A 193:845–852
Schibler F, Manser MB (2007) The irrelevance of individual discrimination in meerkat alarm calls. Anim Behav 74:1259–1268
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1990) The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another species` alarm calls. Anim Behav 40:754–764
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2003) Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annu Rev Psychol 54:145–173
Slocombe KE, Townsend SW, Zuberbühler K (2009) Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) distinguish between different scream types: evidence from a playback study. Anim Cogn 12:441–449
Sproul C, Palleroni A, Hauser MD (2006) Cotton top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus, alarm calls contain sufficient information for recognition of individual identity. Anim Behav 72:1379–1385
Vauclair J (2002) Categorization and conceptual behavior in nonhuman primates. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt GM (eds) The cognitive animal. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 240–245
Weiss DJ, Garibaldi BT, Hauser MD (2001) The production and perception of long calls by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Acoustic analyses and playback experiments. J Comp Psychol 115:258–271
Zimmermann E (1993) Behavioural measures of auditory thresholds in developing tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). J Acoust Soc Am 94:3071–3075
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) Research Group 499. We are grateful to B. Haßfurter for helping during data collection and video analysis. We also wish to thank R. W. Brüning and S. von den Berg for providing technical support and W. Mehl, L. Müller and A. Sauer for animal care. Special thanks go to C. Sherwood-Brock and S. Kessler for correcting the English as well as to M. Scheumann, S. Schmidt and three anonymous reviewers for critical comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
The animal husbandry met the “Guidelines for accommodation and care of animals” (Cons 123 (2006) 3) of the Council of Europe and was approved by the veterinary office of the regulatory agency Hannover (No. 42500/1H). Our experiments complied with the “European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes” (Strasbourg, 18.III.1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konerding, W.S., Brunke, J., Schehka, S. et al. Is acoustic evaluation in a non-primate mammal, the tree shrew, affected by context?. Anim Cogn 14, 787–795 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0411-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0411-8