Abstract
Comparative research can shed light on the evolutionary roots and cognitive underpinnings of prosocial behavior by revealing not only positive instances of prosocial motivations in other species, but also the boundary conditions of these motivations. To explore factors that may constrain prosocial behavior, we examined whether brown capuchins (Cebus apella), which demonstrate regard for the welfare of conspecifics in other contexts, would behave prosocially in a minimal-cost instrumental helping task. We observed that when given the opportunity to share tokens that allow a conspecific to obtain food from an apparatus, capuchins showed no regard for another individual’s welfare. Subjects transferred tokens to an adjacent chamber when the apparatus was present, but did so just as often when the chamber was empty as when there was a recipient present to obtain food. While capuchins are sensitive to others’ welfare in some contexts, the current results suggest that they do not spontaneously produce goal-specific helping actions on behalf of a conspecific. The lack of regard for others exhibited in this context provides insights into the factors that may constrain prosocial behavior in capuchins and other primate species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Due to a camera hard drive error, eleven of these video recordings were unusable. These video files were distributed evenly across conditions, and performance on these trials did not differ systematically from performance on the remaining trials.
References
Aureli F, de Waal FBM (2000) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York
Barnes JL, Martinez M, Langer M, Hill T, Santos LR (2008) Helping behavior and regard for others in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): An evolutionary perspective on altruism. Biol Lett 4(6):638–640
Boesch C (2002) Cooperative hunting roles among Taï chimpanzees. Hum Nat 13(1):27–46
Brosnan S, Houser D, Leimgruber K, Xiaoe E, Chenc T, de Waal FBM (2010) Competing demands of prosociality and equity in monkeys. Evol Hum Behav 31:279–288
Burkart J, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19762–19766
Chen MK, Lakshminaryanan V, Santos LR (2006) The evolution of our preferences: evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. J Pol Econ 114(3):517–537
Clutton-Brock T (2009) Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature. 462:51–57
Cronin KA, Schroeder KKE, Rothwell ES, Silk JB, Snowdon CT (2009) Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. J Comp Psychol 123:231–241
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
de Waal FBM (1989) Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. J of Hum Evol 18(5):433–459
de Waal FBM (1997) The Chimpanzee’s service economy: Food for grooming. Evol Hum Behav 18(6):375–386
de Waal FBM, Aureli F (1996) Consolation, reconciliation, and a possible cognitive difference between macaque and chimpanzee. In: Russon AE, Bard KA, Parker ST (eds) Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 80–110
de Waal FBM, van Roosmalen A (1979) Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:55–66
de Waal F, Leimgruber K, Greenberg A (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:13685–13689
Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals. Oxford University Press, New York
Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL (2006) Prosocial development. In: Eisenberg N (ed) Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development Vol 3. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 646–718
Flombaum JI, Santos LR (2005) Rhesus monkeys attribute perception to others. Curr Biol 15:447–452
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785
Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61:139–151
Jaeggi AV, Burkart JM, Van Schaik CP (2010) On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2723–2735
Jensen K, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B273:1013–1021
Lakshminarayanan VR, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000
Lakshminarayanan V, Chen MK, Santos LR (2008) Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Phil Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 363:3837–3844
Lakshminarayanan V, Santos LR, Chen MK (in press) The evolution of decision-making under risk: framing effects in monkey risk preferences. J Exp Soc Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.011
Melis AP, Warneken F, Jensen K, Schneider AC, Call J, Tomasello M (2010) Chimpanzees help conspecifics obtain food and non-food items. Proc Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1735
Mitani JC, Merriwether DA, Zhang C (2000) Male affiliation, cooperation and kinship in wild chimpanzees. Anim Behav 59(4):885–893
Muller MN (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Study Behav 35:275–331
Nowak M (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–1563
Phillips W, Barnes JL, Mahajan N, Yamaguchi M, Santos LR (2009) ‘Unwilling’ versus unable’: Capuchins’ (Cebus apella) Understanding of human intentional action? Dev Sci 12(6):938–945
Silk JB (2009) Social preferences in primates. In: Glimcker P, Camerer C, Fehr E, Poldrack R (eds) Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain. Elsevier, London, pp 269–283
Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS et al (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437:1357–1359
Stevens J (2010) Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cog. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x
Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46(1):35–57
Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP et al (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Anim Behav 75:1757–1770
Warneken F, Tomasello M (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:1301–1303
Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5:e184
Westergaard GC, Evans TA, Howell S (2007) Token mediated tool exchange between tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cog 10:407–414
Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2010) The influence of kin relationship and reciprocal context on chimpanzees’ other-regarding preferences. Anim Behav 79(3):595–602
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Jordan Comins, Elizabeth Spelke, Sally Boysen, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We also thank Tanya Mayer, Mary Altonje, Camille Buchanan, Cora Mukerji, and Caroline Drucker for their help running these studies, and the members of the Comparative Cognition Laboratory at Yale University for valuable discussions about the experimental design. We thank the McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award and Yale University for their help funding this work. This research was conducted in compliance with federal laws of the United States of America and with the regulations of Yale University. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skerry, A.E., Sheskin, M. & Santos, L.R. Capuchin monkeys are not prosocial in an instrumental helping task. Anim Cogn 14, 647–654 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0399-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0399-0