Skip to main content
Log in

Are dogs (Canis familiaris) misled more by their owners than by strangers in a food choice task?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dogs are highly skilled in understanding a large variety of human social cues and use them appropriately to solve a number of different cognitive tasks. They rely on human signals even when these are contradictory or misleading and ultimately prevent them from correctly solving a task. In the following two experiments, we investigated whether the owner and a stranger differently influenced dogs’ choices in food discrimination tasks. In Experiment 1, 48 dogs were tested in 3 different conditions: (1) choice between a large and a small amount of dog pellets with no demonstration; (2) choice between a large and a small amount of dog pellets after having witnessed the owner/stranger favouring the small quantity; (3) choice between two single food pellets after observing the owner/stranger choosing one of them. In Experiment 2, 48 dogs could choose between two foods of different palatability: in Condition 1, dogs chose between a slice of sausage and a dry pellet with no demonstration. In Condition 2, the same choice was available but with a person (owner/stranger) showing a preference for the dry pellet. In Condition 3, dogs chose between a single dry pellet and 8 slices of sausage, with the person (owner/stranger) showing a preference for the pellet. In both experiments, dogs conformed to the human’s indications even though these led to the selection of the less advantageous option (i.e. the smaller amount of food in Experiment 1 or the low quality food in Experiment 2). However, the owner and the stranger did not differently influence the dogs’ behaviour. Results show that dogs are willing to follow a person’s indication even when this is visibly (if perhaps only mildly) counterproductive to them and that they are socially prepared to rely equally on cues given by the owner and an unfamiliar friendly person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food locations that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M (2009) Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Proc 81:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog. Evol Comm 2:137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Serpell JA (2003) Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. JAVMA 223:1293–1300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubinyi E, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miklosi A, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer R, Custance D (2007) A counterbalanced version of Ainsworth’s strange situation procedure reveals secure-base effects in dog-human relationships. Appl Anim Behav Sci 109:306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Gurobi K, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Social learning in dogs. The effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in a detour task. Anim Behav 62:1109–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timar-Geng K, Csányi V (2004) Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human. J Comp Psychol 118:375–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prato-Previde E, Custance DM, Spiezio C, Sabatini F (2003) Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth’s strange situation. Behav 140:225–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P (2008) Is your choice my choice? Owners’ influence on the pet dogs’ performance in a food choice task. Anim Cogn 11:167–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Range F, Horn L, Bugnyar T, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2009) Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Anim Cogn 12:181–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topál J, Gergely G, Erdo˝hegyi A, Csibra G, Miklósi A (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funds from the Università di Milano to Emanuela Prato-Previde and by funds from Università di Parma to Paola Valsecchi and MIUR (PRIN 2006). A special thank to Chiara Zanibelli for her invaluable help in data collection. Finally, we would like to thank all the owners and dogs that participated as volunteers. This research complies with the current Italian laws on animal welfare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Marshall-Pescini.

Appendix

Appendix

Breeds of participating dogs

Experiment 1: 2 Golden Retriever, 7 Labrador Retriever, 1 Flatcoated Retriever, 1 Chesapeake Bay Retriever, 1 Nova Scotia Duck-tolling Retriever, 1 Dobermann, 4 Terranova, 1 Border Collie, 1 Bernese Mountain Dog, 1 Shetland Sheepdog, 2 German Shepherd, 1 Scottish Collie, 1 Jack Russell, 1 Toy Poodle, 1 St. Bernard Dog, 1 Cocker Spaniel, 1 Spinone Italiano; 1 Australian Shepherd, 1 Afghan Hound, 1 Rottweiler and 19 mixed breed.

Experiment 2: 3 Beagle, 1 Scottish Collie, 1 English Setter, 1 Argentinean Dogo, 1 Bernese Mountain Dog, 3 Dachshund, 4 Labrador Retriever, 2 Golden Retriever, 1 Dalmatian, 3 English Bulldog, 1 American Cocker Spaniel, 1 English Cocker Spaniel, 1 Miniature Schnauzer, 1 Miniature Poodle, 1 Czechoslovakian Wolfdog and 23 mixed breed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall-Pescini, S., Prato-Previde, E. & Valsecchi, P. Are dogs (Canis familiaris) misled more by their owners than by strangers in a food choice task?. Anim Cogn 14, 137–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0340-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0340-y

Keywords

Navigation