Skip to main content
Log in

Egyptian honeybee pollen as antimicrobial, antioxidant agents, and dietary food supplements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, three Egyptian bee pollen types from different plant sources, namely maize (Zea mays), clover (Trifolium alexandrinum), and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera), were evaluated as natural antimicrobial agents, antioxidants, and food additives. A methanolic extract of maize bee pollen exhibited the highest antibacterial activity, followed by clover and date palm bee pollen. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most sensitive, followed by Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In ghee, all methanolic extracts, especially that of maize bee pollen, showed high antioxidant activities as radical scavenger substances and as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation. Sensory evaluation of yoghurt supplemented with different bee pollens revealed that maize bee pollen improve texture, increased gel strength, and decreased syneresis and had favorable nutty flavor, while clover and date palm pollen added a sweet taste and bean-like flavor, respectively. These findings establish the potential of Egyptian maize and clover bee pollen as antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, promising natural food supplements, and natural preservatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manca de Nadra MC, Rodriguez Vaquero MJ. Human health benefits, antimicrobial properties, and the future of phenolic compounds as preservatives in the food industry. pp. 467–485. In: Wine and Health. O’Byrne P (ed). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morgano MA, Milani RF, Martins MT, Rodrguez-Amaya DB. Determination of water content in Brazilian honey bee-collected pollen by karl fisher titration. Food Control 22: 1604–1608 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stanciu OG, Marghitas LA, Dezmirean D. Macro- and oligo-mineral elements from honeybee-collected pollen and beebread harvested from Transylvania (Romania). Bull. Uasvm Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 66: 1–2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. González G, Hinojo, MJ, Mateo R, Medina A, Jiménez M. Occurrence of mycotoxin producing fungi in bee pollen. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 105: 1–9 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Özkalp B, and Özcan MM. Antibacterial activity of pollen and propolis extracts. J. Food Agr. Environ. 8: 17–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abouda Z, Zerdani I, Kalalou I, Faid M, Ahami MT. The antibacterial activity of Moraccan bee bread and bee-pollen (fresh and dried) against pathogenic bacteria. Res. J. Microbiol. 6: 376–384 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stefan B. Pollen: Production, nutrition, and health: A review. Bee product Science. Available from: http://www.bee-hexagon.net. Accessed Jan. 15, 2012.

  8. Wagenlehner FE, Schneider H, Ludwig M, Schnitker J, Brahler E, Weidner WA. Pollen extract (cernilton) in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Europ. Urol. 56: 544–551 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morais M, Moreira L, Feás X, Estevinho LM. Honeybee collected pollen from five Portuguese natural parks: palynological origin, phenolic, antioxidant properties and antimicrobial activity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49: 1096–1101 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Savadogo A, Quattara CT, Bassole IN, Traore SA. Bacteriocins and lactic acid bacteria. A minireview. African J. Biotechnol. 5: 678–683 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mckinley MC. The nutrition and health benefits of yoghurt. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 58: 1–12 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riazi A, Ziar H. Effect of honey and starter culture on growth, acidification, sensory properties and bifidobacteria cell counts in fermented skimmed milk. African J. Microbiol. Res. 6: 486–498 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehmood ST, Masud T, Mahmood T, Maqsud S. Effect of different additives from local source on the quality of yoghurt. Pakistan J. Neutr. 7: 695–699 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. White JH. Pollen, Its Collection and Preparation for the Microscope. 2nd ed. Northern Biological Supplies Ltd., and Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, Antony Rowe Ltd., Eastbourne, UK. p. 28 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45: 493–496 (1966)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patton T, Barrett J, Brennan J, Moran N. Use of a spectrophotometric bioassay for determination of microbial sensitivity to manuka honey. J. Microbiol. Methods 64: 84–95 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baron EJ, Peterson LR, Finegold SM. Methods for testing antimicrobial effectiveness. pp. 171–194. In: Diagnostic Microbiology. Mosby Co., St. Louis, MO, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu L, Perret J, Haley S. Antioxidant properties of bran extracts from alkorn wheat grown at different locations. J. Agr. Food Chem. 51: 1566–1570. (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA. p. 1298 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Human H, Nilson SW. Nutritional contents of fresh, bee-collected and stored pollen of Aloe greatheadu var davyana (Asphodelaceae). Phytochemistry 67: 1486–1492 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Washington, DC, USA. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dave RL, Shah N. Viability of yoghurt probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made from commercial starter cultures. Int. Dairy J. 7: 31–40 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. SPSS. Statistical Package for Social Sciences. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duncan DB. Multiple range and Multiple F test. Biometr. 11: 1–42 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Man J, Rogosa M, Sharpe E. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23: 130–135 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fennema OR. Principles of food science. pp. 1067–1068. In: Part I. Food Chemistry. Dekker M. (ed). New York, NY, USA, (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thabet HA. Biochemical studies on some pollen grains. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Day S, Beyer R, Mercer A, Ogden S. The nutrient composition of honey bee-collected pollen in Otago, New Zealand. J. Apicul. Res. 29: 138–146 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Szczêsna, T. Protein content and amino acid composition of beecollected pollen from selected botanical origins. J. Apicul. Sci. 50: 81–90 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JC. Free radicals in biology and medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford University, Clarenson Press, UK. pp. 416–494 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campos MG, Cunha PA, Navarro MC, Utrilla MP. Free radical scavenger activity of bee pollen. Polyphenols 94: 414–426 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suja KP, Abraham T, Thamizh NS, Jayalekshmy A, Arumughan C. Antioxidant efficacy of sesame cake extract in vegetable oil protection. Food Chem. 84: 393–400 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Almeida-Muradian LB, Pamplona LC, Coimbra S, Barth OM. Chemical composition and botanical evaluation of dried bee pollen pellets. J. Food Compos. Anal. 18: 105–111. (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Graikou K, Kapeta S, Aligiannis N, Sotiroudis G, Chondrogianni N, Gonos E, Chinou I. Chemical analysis of Greek pollen-Antioxidant, antimicrobial and proteasome activation properties. Chem. Cent. J. 5: 33–48 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Erkmen O, Özcan M. Antibacterial effects of Turkish propolis, pollen and laurel on the spoilage and pathogenic food-related microorganisms. J. Med. Food 11:587–592 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Loizzo MR, Statti GA, Tundis R, Conforti F, Ando S, Menichini F. Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of Cirsium tenoreanum. Fitoterapia 75: 577–580 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hussein MM, Hassan FM, Abdeldaym HH, Salama A, Enab AK, Abd El-Galil AA. Utilization of some plant polysaccharides for improving yoghurt consistency. Ann. Agr. Sci. 56: 97–103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu-Tang HE, Chang LU, Jian-Hua S. Effects of active components in pollen on fermentation and qualities of yoghurt. J. Food Sci. 29: 58–60 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Elbanna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khider, M., Elbanna, K., Mahmoud, A. et al. Egyptian honeybee pollen as antimicrobial, antioxidant agents, and dietary food supplements. Food Sci Biotechnol 22, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0238-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0238-y

Keywords

Navigation