Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy and non-dairy environments

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four strains and 2 strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from the commercial yogurt and kimchi products in Korea, respectively. Based on the 16S rRNA sequencing data, strain A from a drink-type yogurt manufactured by dairy company S, was a Gram-positive, rod-shaped Lactobacillus helveticus, and both strain B (company N) and D (company H) were identified as L. casei ssp. casei, and strain C (company L) as L. paracasei. None of yogurt strain B and D was recovered from the samples exposed to the simulated gastric juice, pH 2.0 for 1.5 hr. Of the 6 isolates tested, strain YS93 from kimchi was the most resistant to acidic condition using the simulated gastric juice, pH 2.0. Moreover, it was shown that 2 kimchi isolates and yogurt strain D produced antibacterial substances, probably bacteriocin-like peptide, which was inhibitory against Staphylococcus aureus as an indicator. In an adhesion assay using a Caco-2 cell, the adherence activity of kimchi strains YS29 and YS93 was significantly higher than those of 4 yogurt starter strains tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elder R. Drinkable yogurt beats the bagel. Drug Store News 25: 42–50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Korea Dairy Industries Association. Dairy product consumption has increased with the growth of the food service industry: http://www.koreadia.or.kr. Accessed Oct. 3, 2007.

  3. Sanders ME, Huis in’t Veld J. Review: Bringing a probiotic-containing functional food to the market: Microbiological, product, regulatory, and labeling issues. Anton. Int. J. G. Leeuw. 76: 293–315 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suh HJ, Kim YS, Kim JM, Lee H. Effect of mulberry extract on the growth of yogurt starter cultures. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 26: 144–147 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon TY, Lee JH. Characterization of the scr gene cluster involved in sucrose utilization in Bifidobacterium longum. Korean J. Microbial. Biotechnol. 32: 99–205 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilliland SE, Staley TE, Bush LJ. Importance in bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus used as a dietary adjunct. J. Dairy Sci. 67: 3045–3051 (1984)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parret AHA, Schoofs G, Proost P, De Mot R. Plant lectin-like bacteriocin from a rhizosphere-colonizing Pseudomonas isolate. J. Bacteriol. 185: 897–908 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilmotte A, Van der Auwera G, de Wachter R. Structure of the 16S ribosomal RNA of the thermophilic Cyanobacterium chlorogloeopsis HTF (Mastigocladus laminosus HTF′) strain PCC7518, and phylogenetic analysis. FEBS Lett. 317: 96–100 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Biotechnology 24: 104–108 (1992)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410 (1990)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tagg J, Mcgiven AR. Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl. Environ. Microb. 21: 943–948 (1971)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Appl. Environ. Microb. 71: 3060–3067 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene JD, Klaenhammer TR. Factors involved in adherence of lactobacilli to human Caco-2 cells. Appl. Environ. Microb. 60: 4487–4494 (1994)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugita-Konishi Y, Shibata K, Yun SS, Hara-Kudo Y, Yamaguchi K, Kumagai S. Immune functions of immunoglobulin Y isolated from egg yolk of hens immunized with various infectious bacteria. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 60: 886–888 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mori K, Yamazaki K, Ishiyama T, Katsumata M, Kobayashi K, Kawai Y, Inoue N, Shinano H. Comparative sequence analysis of the genes coding for 16s rRNA of Lactobacillus casei-related texa. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47: 54–57 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavolv A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goldstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Diaz-Muniz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’sulllivan D, Steele J, Unlu, G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 15611–15616 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naser SM, Hagen KE, Vancanneyt M, Cleewerck I, Swings J, Tompkins TA, Cachat, Priest B. Lactobacillus suntoryeus is a later synonym of Lactobacillus helveticus (Orla-Jensen 1919). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 56: 355–360 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Felis GE, Dellaglio F, Mizzi L, Torriani S. Comparative sequence analysis of a recA gene fragment brings new evidence for a change in the taxonomy of the Lactobacillus casei group. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 51: 2113–2117 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins MD, Phillips BA, Zanoni P. Deoxyribonucleic acid homology studies of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei sp. nov., subsp. Paracasei, and subsp. tolerans, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus sp. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39: 105–108 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dellaglio F, Dicks LMT, Du Toit M, Torriani S. Designation of ATCC 334 in place of ATCC 393 (NCDO 1619) as the neotype strain of Lactobacillus casei subsp. Casei and rejection of the name Lactobacillus paracasei. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41: 340–342 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dicks LMT, DU Plessis EM, Dellaglio F, Lauer E. Reclassification of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 15820 as Lactobacillus zeae nom. rev., designation of ATCC 334 as the neotype of L. casei subsp. casei, and rejection of the name Lactobacilllus paracasei. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46: 337–340 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heller KJ. Probiotic bacteria in the fermented foods: Product characteristics and starter organisms. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73(suppl): 374S–379S (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66: 365–378 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vizoso P, Pinto MG, Franz CM, Schillinger U, Holzapfel WH. Lactobacillus spp. with in vitro probiotic properties from human faeces and traditional fermented products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 109: 205–214 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, Collins JK. Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Bifidobacterium isolates from the human gastrointestinal tract. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26: 333–337 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Conway PL, Gorbach SL, Goldin BR. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 112–116 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Y, Adams MC. In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 91: 253–260 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dare R, Magee JT, Mathison GE. In vitro studies on the bacteriocidal properties of natural and synthetic gastric juices. J. Med. Microbiol. 5: 395–406 (1972)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Havenaar R, Huis in’t Veld J. Probiotics: A general view. pp. 151–170. In: The Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease. Wood BJ (ed). Elsevier, New York, NY, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Golowczyc MA, Mobilia P, Garrotea GL, Abrahama AG, De Antoni GL. Protective action of Lactobacillus kefir carrying S-layer protein against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 118: 264–273 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rastall RA, Martin V. Probiotics and symbiotics: Towards the next generation. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 13: 490–496 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saito T. Selection of useful probiotic lactic acid bacteria from the Lactobacillus acidophilus group and their applications to functional foods. Anim. Sci. J. 75: 1–13 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Sik Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, TS., Kim, JY., Kim, KH. et al. In vitro evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy and non-dairy environments. Food Sci Biotechnol 19, 19–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0003-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0003-4

Keywords

Navigation