Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subclavian artery involvement in patients with giant cell arteritis: do we need a modified Halo Score?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether adding the subclavian artery examination into the ultrasound (US) Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, improves the diagnostic accuracy of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and its relationship with systemic inflammation.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of patients referred to a GCA fast track pathway (FTP) over a 1-year period. Patients underwent US exam of temporal and large vessel (LV) (carotid, subclavian, and axillary) arteries. The extent of inflammation was measured by the halo count, the Southend Halo Score, and the modified Halo Score. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis was clinical confirmation after 6-month follow-up.

Results

Sixty-four patients were evaluated in the FTP, 17 (26.5%) had GCA. Subclavian artery involvement was present only in patients with GCA (29.4% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Overall, the three scores showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for GCA (ROC AUC 0.906, 0.930, and 0.928, respectively) and moderate correlations with acute phase reactants (0.35–0.51, p < 0.01). Only the modified Halo Score correlated with markers of inflammation in patients with LV involvement.

Conclusions

The inclusion of subclavian artery examination in the modified Halo Score does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA. Nevertheless, it correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in LV-GCA.

Key Points

• Adding the subclavian artery examination into the Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA.

• However, the extent of vascular inflammation as quantified by the modified Halo Score correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in the large vessel (LV) GCA subgroup of patients.

• Although the diagnostic value of adding subclavian arteries to the current recommended US examination of GCA is limited, it may have a role in monitoring disease activity as it correlates with the general burden of inflammation in LV GCA. These findings need to be confirmed in additional populations and larger prospective studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, Basu N, Cid MC, Ferrario F, Flores-Suarez LF, Gross WL, Guillevin L, Hagen EC, Hoffman GS, Jayne DR, Kallenberg CGM, Lamprecht P, Langford CA, Luqmani RA, Mahr AD, Matteson EL, Merkel PA, Ozen S, Pusey CD, Rasmussen N, Rees AJ, Scott DGI, Specks U, Stone JH, Takahashi K, Watts RA (2013) 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 65(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C, Besson FL, Bley TA, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, Cimmino MA, Clark E, Dasgupta B, Diamantopoulos AP, Direskeneli H, Iagnocco A, Klink T, Neill L, Ponte C, Salvarani C, Slart RHJA, Whitlock M, Schmidt WA (2018) EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 77(5):636–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Geest KSM, Borg F, Kayani A, Paap D, Gondo P, Schmidt W, Luqmani RA, Dasgupta B (2020) Novel ultrasonographic Halo Score for giant cell arteritis: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and association with ocular ischaemia. Ann Rheum Dis 79(3):393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chattopadhyay A, Ghosh A (2020) «Halo Score»: missing large-vessel giant cell arteritis- do we need a «modified Halo Score»? Ann Rheum Dis

  5. Diamantopoulos AP, Haugeberg G, Lindland A, Myklebust G (2016) The fast-track ultrasound clinic for early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis significantly reduces permanent visual impairment: towards a more effective strategy to improve clinical outcome in giant cell arteritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 55(1):66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball EL, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Gohil R, Clarke JMF (2010) Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. Br J Surg 97(12):1765–1771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arida A, Kyprianou M, Kanakis M, Sfikakis PP (2010) The diagnostic value of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in giant cell arteritis: a second meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karassa FB, Matsagas MI, Schmidt WA, Ioannidis JPA (2005) Meta-analysis: test performance of ultrasonography for giant-cell arteritis. Ann Intern Med 142(5):359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rinagel M, Chatelus E, Jousse-Joulin S, Sibilia J, Gottenberg J-E, Chasset F, Arnaud L (2019) Diagnostic performance of temporal artery ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 18(1):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Molina Collada J, Martínez-Barrio J, Serrano-Benavente B, Castrejón I, Caballero Motta LR, Trives Folguera L, Álvaro-Gracia JM (2020) Diagnostic value of ultrasound halo count and Halo Score in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective study from routine care. Ann Rheum Dis:annrheumdis-2020-218631

  11. van der Geest KS, Dasgupta B (2020) Response to: «Diagnostic value of ultrasound halo count and Halo Score in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective study from routine care» by Molina Collada et al. Ann Rheum Dis

  12. Löffler C, Hoffend J, Benck U, Krämer BK, Bergner R (2017) The value of ultrasound in diagnosing extracranial large-vessel vasculitis compared to FDG-PET/CT: A retrospective study. Clin Rheumatol 36(9):2079–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghinoi A, Pipitone N, Nicolini A, Boiardi L, Silingardi M, Germanò G et al (2012) Large-vessel involvement in recent-onset giant cell arteritis: a case-control colour-Doppler sonography study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(4):730–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt WA, Seifert A, Gromnica-Ihle E, Krause A, Natusch A (2008) Ultrasound of proximal upper extremity arteries to increase the diagnostic yield in large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(1):96–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackie SL, Dejaco C, Appenzeller S, Camellino D, Duftner C, Gonzalez-Chiappe S, Mahr A, Mukhtyar C, Reynolds G, de Souza AWS, Brouwer E, Bukhari M, Buttgereit F, Byrne D, Cid MC, Cimmino M, Direskeneli H, Gilbert K, Kermani TA, Khan A, Lanyon P, Luqmani R, Mallen C, Mason JC, Matteson EL, Merkel PA, Mollan S, Neill L, Sullivan EO’, Sandovici M, Schmidt WA, Watts R, Whitlock M, Yacyshyn E, Ytterberg S, Dasgupta B (2020) British Society for Rheumatology guideline on diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 59(3):e1–e23

  16. van der Geest KSM, Dasgupta B (2020) Response to: «“Halo Score”: missing large vessel giant cell arteritis- do we need a modified “Halo Score?”» by Chattopadhyay and Ghosh. Ann Rheum Dis

  17. Coath F, Gillbert K, Griffiths B, Hall F, Kay L, Lanyon P, Luqmani R, Mackie SL, Mason JC, Mills J, Mollan S, Morgan AW, Mukhtyar C, Quick V, Watts R, Dasgupta B (2019) Giant cell arteritis: new concepts, treatments and the unmet need that remains. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58(7):1123–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the patients who participated in this study.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of this study. Study design, subject recruitment, and US examination were performed by JMC. JMC and LCM collected the epidemiological and clinical data. JMC and IC performed the statistical analysis. JMC, JMB, BSB, IC, JCN-G, LCM, LTF, and JAG drafted the manuscript. All co-authors revised the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Molina Collada.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research

Ethics approval

The research protocol has been approved by the Research ethical Committee of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, and all patients gave informed written consent for their participation in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molina Collada, J., Martínez-Barrio, J., Serrano-Benavente, B. et al. Subclavian artery involvement in patients with giant cell arteritis: do we need a modified Halo Score?. Clin Rheumatol 40, 2821–2827 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05577-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05577-4

Keywords

Navigation