Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of the dimensions, construct validity, and utility for rheumatoid arthritis screening of the COPCORD instrument

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the structural validity of the Community-Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) core instrument as a screening tool for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by means of assessing the existence of domains in the questionnaire. The Mexican version of the COPCORD instrument was applied to individuals over18 years of age in five regions of the country through a probabilistic/convenience household survey. Clinical confirmation of RA diagnosis was used. The variables analyzed included self-reported comorbidities and manifestations of the disease, as well as sociodemographic characteristics. The statistical approach was based on polychoric exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis by means of probit structural equation models. A total of 19,213 subjects were included in the analysis. The average age for the total sample was 42.89 years old; 40.64 % of the subjects were older than 45 years of age and 20.42 % older than 55. More than 80 % of the variation was related to three underlying factors: recent pain, historical pain, and disability. The findings verified the usefulness of the COPCORD instrument as a screening tool for RA. The results also allowed to characterize how the variation in terms of manifestations of the disease could be accounted for diagnosing the disease in the Mexican context and examined the capabilities of the instrument to measure correctly the main characteristics of patients suffering from RA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toledano E, Candelas G, Rosales Z et al (2012) A meta-analysis of mortality in rheumatic diseases. Reumatol Clin 8(6):334–341. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2012.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lidgren L (2012) Looking back at the start of the bone and joint decade what have we learnt? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26(2):169–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goycochea-Robles MV, Sanin LH, Moreno-Montoya J et al (2011) Validity of the COPCORD core questionnaire as a classification tool for rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol 38(suppl 86):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haq SA, Davatchi F, Dahaghin S et al (2010) Development of a questionnaire for identification of the risk factors for osteoarthritis of the knees in developing countries. A pilot study in Iran and Bangladesh. An ILAR-COPCORD phase III study. Int J Rheum Dis 13(3):203–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett K, Cardiel MH, Ferraz MB et al (1997) Cross cultural adaptation and screening characteristics of the COPCORD Core Questionnaire in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. J Rheumatol 24:160–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peláez-Ballestas I, Sanin LH, Moreno-Montoya J et al (2011) Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases in Mexico. A study of 5 regions based on the COPCORD methodology. J Rheumatol Suppl 86:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA (2006) Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 36:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Álvarez-Hernández E, Peláez-Ballestas I, Vázquez-Mellado J et al (2008) Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with gout. Arthritis Rheum 59(5):665–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flora BD, Labrish C, Chalmers P (2012) Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Front Psychol 3:55–57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foreo CG, Maydeu-Olivares A, Gallardo-Pujol D (2009) Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: a Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 16(4):625–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. David BF, Curran PJ (2004) An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods 9(4):466–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Satorra A, Bentler PM (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Von Eye A, Clogg C (eds) Latent variables analysis: applications for developmental research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan KH, Bentler PM (1998) Structural equation modeling with robust covariances. Sociol Methodol 28:363–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wirth RJ, Edwards MC (2007) Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. Psychol Methods 12:58–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scientific Software International, Inc (2012) LISREL: a general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system involving multiple indicators of unmeasured variables (computer program). Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  16. StataCorp LP (2011) Stata statistical software (computer program). StataCorp, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  17. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2012) R for Windows (computer program). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roodman D (2011) Estimating fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata J 11(2):159–206

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uhm DC, Nam ES, Lee HY et al (2012) Health-related quality of life in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with pain, disease activity, disability in activities of daily living and depression. J Korean Acad Nurs 42(3):434–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lesuis N, Befrits R, Nyberg F et al (2012) Gender and the treatment of immune-mediated chronic inflammatory diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis: an observational study. BMC Med 10:82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blood EA, Cheng DM (2011) The use of mixed models for the analysis of mediated data with time-dependent predictors. J Environ Public Health 2011:435078. doi:10.1155/2011/435078

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the funds provided by the Salud 2007-C01-69439 and Salud 2007-C01 69765 programs of the National Council of Science and Technology of México (CONACYT) and the Fundación Mexicana para Enfermos Reumáticos (FUMERAC).

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingris Peláez-Ballestas.

Additional information

GEEMA (Grupo de Estudio Epidemiológico de Enfermedades Musculo Articulares): R. Burgos-Vargas, Hospital General de México, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City; MH Cardiel, Hospital Secretaría de Salud, Hospital General “Dr. Miguel Silva.”; L.H. Sanín, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; M. Garza-Elizondo, Hospital Universitario José Eleuterio González; J. Rodriguez-Amado, Hospital Universitario José Eleuterio González; M.V. Goycochea-Robles, Unidad de Investigación, Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología; M. Madariaga, Hospital General de Culiacán, Secretaría de Salud; J. Zamudio, Hospital General de Culiacán, Secretaría de Salud; Natalia Santana Portillo, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Chihuahua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreno-Montoya, J., Alvarez-Nemegyei, J., Trejo-Valdivia, B. et al. Assessment of the dimensions, construct validity, and utility for rheumatoid arthritis screening of the COPCORD instrument. Clin Rheumatol 33, 631–636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2367-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2367-3

Keywords

Navigation