Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved radiological outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of early treatment with methotrexate in the era of biological drugs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the radiological progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed in the 1980s with those of the late 1990s until 2005 and to evaluate prognostic factors. Ninety-two RA patients who were firstly seen in our clinic from 1997 to 2005 were identified. As a control group, 89 RA patients from 1986 to 1990 were matched for the criteria disease duration (mean, 22 ± 17 months), age, and number of x-ray controls. Radiological damage was measured by the Ratingen score (RS). The baseline RS of the 1997–2005 group was significantly lower (mean, 3.8 ± 8.7 vs 7.7 ± 13.0; p < 0.0001) and showed less radiological progression during follow-up than the 1986–1990 group (ΔRS/year of 0.95 ± 2.19 vs. 5.69 ± 8.43; p < 0.0001). In the later group, more patients (73 vs. 28 %) had methotrexate (MTX). Twenty-one (23 %) of the patients in the later group received biological drugs. However, the subgroup 1997–2000 (n = 29), before the approval of TNF-inhibitors, had already lower baseline RS in comparison to 1986–1990 (2.7 ± 4.9; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that early start of MTX (before or directly after first consultation) was a predictor of favorable outcome (p < 0.005), as were low erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline and belonging to the later group. In contrast, neither treatment with glucocorticoids or biological drugs nor the overall rate of MTX or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use was predictive. Radiological damage is markedly diminished in RA patients seen since mid of the 1990s. Early treatment with MTX seems to be the key factor for this improved prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziegler S, Huscher D, Karberg K, Krause A, Wassenberg S, Zink A (2010) Trends in treatment and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany 1997–2007: results from the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres. Ann Rheum Dis 69(10):1803–1808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pincus T, Sokka T, Kautiainen H (2005) Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985. Arthritis Rheum 52(4):1009–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott DL, Pugner K, Kaarela K, Doyle DV, Woolf A, Holmes J et al (2000) The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39(2):122–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Finckh A, Choi HK, Wolfe F (2006) Progression of radiographic joint damage in different eras: trends towards milder disease in rheumatoid arthritis are attributable to improved treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 65(9):1192–1197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sokka T, Kautiainen H, Hakkinen A, Hannonen P (2004) Radiographic progression is getting milder in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Results of 3 cohorts over 5 years. J Rheumatol 31(6):1073–1082

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31(3):315–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rau R, Wassenberg S, Herborn G, Stucki G, Gebler A (1998) A new method of scoring radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 25(11):2094–2107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rau R, Herborn G (1995) A modified version of Larsen's scoring method to assess radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 22(10):1976–1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rau R, Herborn G, Karger T, Menninger H, Elhardt D, Schmitt J (1991) A double blind randomized parallel trial of intramuscular methotrexate and gold sodium thiomalate in early erosive rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 18(3):328–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wassenberg S, Rau R, Steinfeld P, Zeidler H (2005) Very low-dose prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis retards radiographic progression over 2 years: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52(11):3371–3380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Elliott MJ, Williams RO, Maini RN (1995) TNF-alpha is an effective therapeutic target for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann NY Acad Sci 766:272–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi HK, Hernan MA, Seeger JD, Robins JM, Wolfe F (2002) Methotrexate and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study. Lancet 359(9313):1173–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krause D, Schleusser B, Herborn G, Rau R (2000) Response to methotrexate treatment is associated with reduced mortality in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43(1):14–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiss AB, Carsons SE, Anwar K, Rao S, Edelman SD, Zhang H et al (2008) Atheroprotective effects of methotrexate on reverse cholesterol transport proteins and foam cell transformation in human THP-1 monocyte/macrophages. Arthritis Rheum 58(12):3675–3683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeurissen ME, Boerbooms AM, van de Putte LB, Doesburg WH, Lemmens AM (1991) Influence of methotrexate and azathioprine on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, double-blind study. Ann Intern Med 114(12):999–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reykdal S, Steinsson K, Sigurjonsson K, Brekkan A (1989) Methotrexate treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: effects on radiological progression. Scand J Rheumatol 18(4):221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordstrom DM, West SG, Andersen PA, Sharp JT (1987) Pulse methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled prospective roentgenographic study. Ann Intern Med 107(6):797–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rau R, Herborn G, Karger T, Werdier D (1991) Retardation of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate therapy. A controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 34(10):1236–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, Durez P, Chang DJ, Robertson D et al (2008) Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet 372(9636):375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, van VR (2006) The premier study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 54(1):26–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Furst DE (2010) Development of TNF inhibitor therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28(3 Suppl 59):S5–S12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ivan Gojak for most diligent and careful work in the archive.

Disclosures

This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from Wyeth (now Pfizer).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Fiehn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiehn, C., Belke-Voss, E., Krause, D. et al. Improved radiological outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of early treatment with methotrexate in the era of biological drugs. Clin Rheumatol 32, 1735–1742 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2325-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2325-0

Keywords

Navigation