Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman’s pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p > 0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyer SJF, Dalinka MK (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am 21:497–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, Silman AJ (1997) Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Ann Rheum Dis 56:308–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neer CS (1983) Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fongemie AE, Buss DD, Rolnick SJ (1998) Management of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. Am Fam Phys 57:667–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wasilevsky SA, Frankl U (1991) Rotator cuff pathology: arthroscopic assessment and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 267:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawkins RJ, Abrams JS (1987) Impingement syndrome in the absence of rotator cuff tear. Orthop Clin North Am 18:373–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamkar A, Irrgang JJ, Whitney SL (1993) Nonoperative management of secondary shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 17:212–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Butters KP, Rockwood CA Jr (1988) Office evaluation and management of the shoulder impingement syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 19:755–765

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bigliani LU, Levine WN (1997) Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1854–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (2001) AAOS clinical guideline on shoulder pain: support document. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont (IL)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Akgun K, Birtane M, Akarirmak U (2004) Is local subacromial corticosteroid injection beneficial in subacromial impingement syndrome? Clin Rheumatol 23:496–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM (2003) Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004016

  13. Tallia AF, Cardone DA (2003) Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the shoulder region. Am Fam Phys 67:1271–1278

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paavola M, Kannus P, Janvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Jozsa L, Jarvinen M (2002) Treatment of tendon disorders. Is there a role for corticosteroid injection? Foot Ankle Clin 7:501–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Green S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A (1998) Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder. BMJ 316:354–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quittan M, Schuhfried O, Wiesinger GF, Fialka-Moser V (2000) Clinical effectiveness of magnetic field therapy—a review of the literature. Acta Med Austriaca 27:61–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leclaire R, Bourgouin J (1991) Electromagnetic treatment of shoulder periarthritis: a randomized controlled trial of the efficiency and tolerance of magnetotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:284–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Binder A, Parr G, Hazleman B, Fitton-Jackson S (1984) Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis. A double-blind controlled assessment. Lancet 31:695–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassett CA (1993) Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 51:387–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lednev VV (1991) Possible mechanism for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics 12:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hendee SP, Faour FA, Christensen DA, Patrick B, Durney CH, Blumenthal DK (1996) The effects of weak extremely low frequency magnetic fields on calcium/calmodulin interactions. Biophys J 70:2915–2923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Blanchard JP, Blackman CF (1994) Clarification and application of an ion parametric resonance model for magnetic field interactions with biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics 15:217–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adey WR (1993) Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 51:410–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paul F, Roath S, Melville D (1978) Differential blood cell separation using a high gradient magnetic field. Br J Haematol 38:273–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng N, Van Hoof H, Delport PH, Hoogmartens MJ, Mulie JC (1985) Treatment of non-union, congenital pseudarthroses and benign cystic lesions using pulsed electromagnetic fields. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 19:118–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulier JC, Spaas F (1980) Out-patient treatment of surgically resistant non-unions by induced pulsing current-clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 97:293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Patino O, Grana D, Bolgiani A, Prezzavento G, Mino J, Merlo A, Benaim F (1996) Pulsed electromagnetic fields in experimental cutaneous wound healing in rats. J Burn Care Rehabil 17:528–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Orgel MG, O’Brien WJ, Murray HM (1984) Pulsing electromagnetic field therapy in nerve regeneration: an experimental study in the cat. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:173–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson DH, Jagadeesh P, Newman PP, Harriman DG (1974) The effects of pulsed electromagnetic energy on peripheral nerve regeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 238:575–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Dyer RH Jr, Fielding LP, Miner WK, Markoll R (1993) A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 20:456–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ciombor DM, Aaron RK, Wang S, Simon B (2003) Modification of osteoarthritis by pulsed electromagnetic field a morphological study. Osteoarthr Cartil 11:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin Y, Nishimura R, Nozaki K, Sasaki N, Kadosawa T, Goto N, Date M, Takeuchi A (1992) Effects of pulsing EMFs on the ligament healing in rabbits. J Vet Med Sci 54:1017–1022

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Currier DP, Ray JM, Nyland J, Rooney JG, Noteboom JT, Kellogg R (1993) Effects of electrical and electromagnetic stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 17:177–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee EW, Maffulli N, Li CK, Chan KM (1997) Pulsed magnetic and electromagnetic fields in experimental achilles tendonitis in the rat: a prospective randomized study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:399–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Strauch B, Patel MK, Rosen DJ, Mahadevia S, Brindzei N, Pilla AA (2006) Pulsed magnetic field therapy increases tensile strength in a rat Achilles’ tendon repair model. J Hand Surg [Am] 31:1131–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheing GL, Wan JW, Kai Lo S (2005) Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures. J Rehabil Med 37:372–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson DH (1972) Treatment of soft-tissue injuries by pulsed electrical energy. Br Med J 29:269–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mizushima Y, Akaoka I, Nishida Y (1975) Effects of magnetic field on inflammation. Experientia 151:1411–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Uzunca K, Birtane M, Tastekin N (2006) Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in lateral epicondylitis. Clin Rheumatol (Apr 22, Epub ahead of print)

  40. Calis M, Akgun K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Calis H, Tüzün F (2000) Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 59:44–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17:45–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, Koes BW, Deville W, Bouter LM (1998) The responsiveness of the shoulder disability questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 57:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Johansson K, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Foldevi M (2002) A combination of systematic review and clinicians’ beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain. Br J Gen Pract 52:145–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wetzel BJ, Nindl G, Swez JA, Johnson MT (2002) Quantitative characterization of rat tendinitis to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Biomed Sci Instrum 38:157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Guerkov HH, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Dean DD, Simon BJ, Heckman JD (2001) Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase growth factor release by nonunion cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:265–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wilk KE, Harrelson GL, Arrigo C (1998) Shoulder rehabilitation. In: Andrews JR, Harrelson GL, Wilk KE (eds) Physical rehabilitation of the injured athlete, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 173–227

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jobe FW, Schwab DM, Wilk, Andrews JR (1996) Rehabilitation of the shoulder. In: Brotzman SB (ed) Clinical orthopaedic rehabilitation. Mosby, St.Louis, pp 91–141

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chang WK (2004) Shoulder impingement syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 15:493–510

    Google Scholar 

  50. Foley-Nolan D, Barry C, Coughlan RJ, O’Connor P, Roden D (1990) Pulsed high frequency (27 MHz) electromagnetic therapy for persistent neck pain: a double blind, placebo-controlled study of 20 patients. Orthopedics 13:445–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Papi F, Ghione S, Rosa C, Del Seppia C, Luschi P ( 1995) Exposure to oscillating magnetic fields influences sensitivity to electrical stimuli. II. Experiments on humans. Bioelectromagnetics 16:295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rigato M, Battisti E, Fortunato M, Giordano N (2002) Comparison between the analgesic and therapeutic effects of a musically modulated electromagnetic field (TAMMEF) and those of a 100 Hz electromagnetic field: blind experiment on patients suffering from cervical spondylosis or shoulder periarthritis. J Med Eng Technol 26:253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saygi Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ilknur Aktas

  2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Kenan Akgun

  3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Millet Hospital, Silivri, Turkey

    Bahar Cakmak

  4. Olimpos, No. 229, Akmerkez, Etiler, 34340, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ilknur Aktas

Authors
  1. Ilknur Aktas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenan Akgun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bahar Cakmak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilknur Aktas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aktas, I., Akgun, K. & Cakmak, B. Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 26, 1234–1239 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation