Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of gallium arsenide aluminum laser therapy in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a double blind, placebo-controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) seems controversial. A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic MPS in the neck to evaluate the effects of low-level 830-nm gallium arsenide aluminum (Ga–As–Al) laser therapy. The study group consisted of 64 MPS patients. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In group 1 (n = 32), Ga–As–Al laser treatment was applied over three trigger points bilaterally for 2 min over each point once a day for 15 days during a period of 3 weeks. In group 2 (n = 32), the same treatment protocol was given, but the laser instrument was switched off during applications. All patients in both groups performed daily isometric exercise and stretching exercises for cervical region. Parameters were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. All patients were evaluated with respect to pain (at rest, movement, and night) and assessed by visual analog scale, measurement of active range of motion using an inclinometer and a goniometer, and the neck disability index. In both groups, statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcome measures compared with baseline (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were obtained between the two groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, although the laser therapy has no superiority over placebo groups in this study, we cannot exclude the possibility of effectivity with another treatment regimen including different laser wavelengths and dosages (different intensity and density and/or treatment interval).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simons DG, Travel JG, Simons LS (1999) Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual, vol 1, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farina S, Casarotto M, Benelle M, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Goldoni M, Smania N (2004) A randomized controlled study on the effect of two different treatments (FREMS and TENS) in myofascial pain syndrome. Eur Medicophys 40:293–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Testa M, Barbero M, Gherlone E (2003) Trigger points: update of the clinical aspects. Eur Med Phys 39:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG (2002) Myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friction JR (1990) Myofascial pain syndrome: characteristics and epidemiology. In: Friction JR, Awad EA (eds) Myofascial pain and fibromyalgia: advances in pain research and therapy, vol 17. Raven, New York, pp 107–127

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong CZ, Hsueh TC (1996) Difference in pain relief after trigger point injections in myofascial pain patients with and without fibromyalgia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1161–1166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chesire WP, Abashian SW, Mann JD (1994) Botulinum toxin in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Pain 59:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Porta M (2000) A comparative trial of botulinum toxin type A and methylprednisolone for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and pain from chronic muscle spasm. Pain 85:101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wheeler AH, Goolkasias P, Gretz SS (1998) A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome. Spine 23:1662–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldenberg DL, Felson DT, Dinerman H (1986) A randomized, controlled trial of amitriptyline and naproxen in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 29(11):1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolfe F, Zhao S, Lane N (2000) Preference for nonsteroidal antiinlammatory drugs over acetaminophen by rheumatic disease patients: a survey of 1779 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 43:378–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berry H, Hutchinson DR (1988) A multicentre placebo-controlled study in general practice to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tizanidine in acute low back pain. J Int Med Res 16:75–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han SC, Harrison P (1997) Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger-point management. Reg Anesth 22:89–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Esenyel M, Caglar N, Aldemir T (2000) Treatment of myofascial pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79:48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kruger LR, van der Linden WJ, Cleaton-Jones PE (1998) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction. S Afr J Surg 36:35–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berman BM, Ezzo J, Hadhazy V, Swyers JP (1999) Is acupuncture effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia? J Fam Pract 48:213–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanten WP, Olson SL, Butts NL, Nowicki AL (2000) Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther 80:997–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gam AN, Warming S, Larsen LH, Jensen B, Hoydalsmo O, Allon I et al (1998) Treatment of myofascial trigger points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise: a randomised controlled trial. Pain 77:73–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hakguder A, Birtane M, Gurcan S, Kokino S, Turan FN (2003) Efficacy of low level laser therapy in myofascial pain syndrome: an algometric and thermographic evaluation. Lasers Surg Med 33(5):339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein RG, Eek BC (1990) Low-energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: double-blind controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71:34–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vasseljen O, Hoeg N, Kjeldstad B, Johnsson A, Larsen S (1992) Low level laser versus placebo in the treatment of tennis elbow. Scand J Rehabil Med 24:37–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heussler JK, Hinchey G, Margiotta E, Quinn R, Butler P, Martin J, Sturgess AD (1993) A double blind randomised trial of low power laser treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 52:703–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gur A, Sarac AJ, Cevik R, Altindag O, Sarac S (2004) Efficacy of 904 nm gallium arsenide low level laser therapy in the management of chronic myofascial pain in the neck: a double-blind and randomize-controlled trial. Lasers Surg Med 35(3):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Altan L, Bingöl U, Aykac M, Yurtkuran M (2005) Investigation of the effect of GaAs laser therapy on cervical myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int 25(1):23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simons DG (1990) Muscular pain syndrome. In: Friction JR, Awad EA (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy, vol 17. Myofascial pain and fibromyalgia. Raven Press, New York, pp 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin YS, Huang MH, Chai CY (2006) Effects of helium–neon laser on the mucopolysaccharide induction in experimental osteoarthritic cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14(4):377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Helewa A (1996) Physical therapy management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory condition. In: Walker JM, Helewa A (eds) Physical therapy in arthritis. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 245–265

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brosseau L, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P, de Bie R, Gam A et al (2000) Low level laser therapy for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 8:1961–1969

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee G, Wong E, Mason DT (1996) New concepts in pain management and in the application of low-power laser for relief of cervicothoracic pain syndromes. Am Heart J 132:1329–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Honmura A, Ishii A, Yanase M, Obata J, Haruki E (1993) Analgesic effect of Ga–Al–As diode laser irradiation on hyperalgesia in carrageenan-induced inflammation. Lasers Surg Med 13:463–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Kokino S (2001) The clinical efficacy of low-power laser therapy on pain and function in cervical osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 20:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Simunovic Z, Trobonjaca T, Trobonjaca Z (1998) Treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis—tennis and golfer’s elbow—with low laser therapy: a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 324 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16:145–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ilbuldu E, Cakmak A, Disci R, Aydýn R (2004) Comparison of laser, dry needling, and placebo laser treatments in myofascial pain syndrome. Photomed Laser Surg 22(4):306–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Waylonis GW, Wilke S, O’Toole D, Waylonis DA, Waylonis DB (1998) Chronic myofascial pain: management by low-output helium–neon laser therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69(12):1017–1020

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haker EH, Lundeberg TC (1991) Lateral epicondylalgia. Report of noneffective midlaser treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:984–988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vecchio P, Cave M, King V, Adebajo AO, Smith M, Hazleman BL (1993) A double-blind study of the effectiveness of low-level laser treatment of rotator cuff tendinitis. Br J Rheumatol 32:740–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goats G, Flett E, Hunter JA, Stirling A (1996) Low intensity laser and phototherapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Physiotherapy 82:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gerwin RD (2005) A review of myofascial pain and fibromyalgia—factors that promote their persistence. Acupunct Med 23(3):121–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Simons DG (1988) Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:207–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cummings TM, White A (2001) Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(7):986–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Basford JR, Sheffield PT, Mair SD, Ilstrup DM (1987) Low-energy helium neon laser treatment of thumb osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:794–797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Beckerman H, de Bie RA, De Cuyper HJ, Oostendorp RAB (1992) The efficacy of laser therapy for musculoskeletal and skin disorders: a criteria-based meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Phys Ther 7:483–491

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was presented as a poster presentation in 15th European Congress of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Madrid, Spain, 16–20/5/2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Dundar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dundar, U., Evcik, D., Samli, F. et al. The effect of gallium arsenide aluminum laser therapy in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a double blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Rheumatol 26, 930–934 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0438-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0438-4

Keywords

Navigation