Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by periarticular and generalized loss of bone mass. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been introduced as a method for the assessment of bone status and fracture risk. In this cross-sectional study bone status was assessed by QUS at different peripheral sites in 27 women with RA (mean disease duration 15 years) and in 36 healthy women matched for age, height and weight. Speed of sound (SOS, m/s), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA, dB/MHz) and stiffness of the calcaneus were assessed by a Lunar Achilles device. Amplitude-dependent SOS (Ad-SOS, m/s) of the second to fifth phalanx was measured by a DBM Sonic 1200, and SOS of the distal forearm and third phalanx was measured by a Omnisense multisite scanner. Bone mass (g/cm2 or g) of the hip, spine, distal forearm and total body was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. QUS values were significantly reduced in RA at most sites (p<0.005–0.001), but between-group differences were small, and large overlaps between the groups were noticed. After correction for bone mass, the observed differences remained statistically significant for the calcaneus and distal radius (p<0.05). Independent associations between ultrasound measures and markers of disease activity were not demonstrated. In conclusion, bone status as assessed by QUS was compromised in RA, but whether ultrasound transmission may serve as a marker of disease progression and fracture risk in the individual patient remains to be clarified in prospective studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMC:

Bone mineral content

BMD:

Bone mineral density

BTS:

Bone tissue speed

BUA:

Broadband ultrasound attenuation

DMARD:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

QUS:

Quantitative ultrasound

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

RMSCV:

Root mean square coefficient of variation

SOS:

Speed of sound

References

  1. Kleerekoper M, Villaneuva AR, Stanciu J, Rao DS, Parfitt AM (1985) The role of three-dimensional trabecular micro-structure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 37:594–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM et al. (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ventura V, Mauloni M, Mura M, Paltrinieri F, Aloysio D (1996) Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanges of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 6:368–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C et al. (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple sites. J Clin Densitometry 3:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouxsein ML, Radloff SE (1997) Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus reflects the mechanical properties of calcaneal trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 12:839–846

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Golstein SA, Genant HK (1994) Three quantitative ultrasound paramenters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 55:46–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hans D, Arlott M, Schott A, Roux J, Kotzki P, Meunier P (1995) Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 16:295–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart A, Reid DM, Porter RW (1994) Broad band ultrasound attenuation and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 54:466–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turner CH, Peacock M, Timmermann L, Neal JM, Johnston CC (1995) Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 5:130–135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM (1996) Prediction of fractures in perimenopausal women: a comparison of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation. Ann Rheum Dis 55:140–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen M, Florescu A, Stoltenberg M et al. (1996) Bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 25:367–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gough A, Lilley J, Ayre S, Holder RI, Holder RL, Emery P (1994) Generalised bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 344:23–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deodhar AA, Brabyn J, Jones PW, Davis MJ, Woolf AD (1995) Longitudinal study of hand bone densitometry in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:1204–1210

    Google Scholar 

  14. Florescu A, Pødenphant J, Thamsborg G, Hansen M, Leffers AM, Andersen V (1993) Distal metacarpal bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Methodological investigation and application in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 11:635–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotake S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N et al. (1999) IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest 103:1345–1352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall GM, Daniels M, Doyle DV, Spector TD (1993) The effect of rheumatoid arthritis and steroid therapy on bone density in postmenopausal women. Arthritis Rheum 36:1510–1516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laan RF, Buijs WC, Verbeek AL, Draad MP, Corstens FH, van de Putte LB (1993) Bone mineral density in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: influence of disease activity and functional capacity. Ann Rheum Dis 52:21–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bywaters EGL (1960) The early radiological signs of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis 11:231–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peel NF, Spittlehouse AJ, Bax DE, Eastell R (1994) Bone mineral density of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:983–991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Devlin J, Lilley J, Gough A et al. (1996) Clinical associations of dual energy x-ray measurement of hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 35:1256–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2000) Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:522–530

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huusko TM, Korpela M, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R (2001) Threefold increased risk of hip fractures with rheumatoid arthritis in central Finland. Ann Rheum Dis 60:521–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peel NF, Moore DJ, Barrington NA, Bax De, Eastell R (1995) Risk of vertebral fracture and relationship to bone mineral density in steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 54:801–806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Verstraeten A, Dequeker J (1986) Vertebral and peripheral bone mineral content and fracture incidence in post-menopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 45:852–857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Gough A et al. (1999) Evaluation of finger ultrasound in the assessment of bone status with application of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporosis Int 9:82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Röben P, Barkmann R, Ullrich S, Gause A, Heller M, Glüer CC (2001) Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis 60:670–677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin JC, Munro R, Campbell MK, Reid DM (1997) Effects of disease and corticoids on appendicular bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with axial measurements. Br J Rheumatol 36:43–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madsen OR, Egsmose C, Hansen B, Sørensen OH (1998) Soft tissue composition, quadriceps strength, bone quality and bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 16:27–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Block DA et al. (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM (1997) The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporosis Int 7:7–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C et al. (1999) Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14:644–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Madsen OR, Beck Jensen J-E, Sørensen OH (1997) Validation of a dual energy x-ray absorptiometer: measurement of bone mass and soft tissue composition. Eur J Appl Physiol 75:554–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London

  35. Röben P, Barkmann R, Ulrich S, Gause A, Heller M, Glüer CC (2001) Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis 60:670–677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alenfeld FE, Diessel E, Brezger M, Sieper J, Felsenberg D, Braun J (2000) Detailed analyses of periarticular osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporosis Int 11:400–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haugeberg G, Orstavik RE, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2003) Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population. Osteoporosis Int 14:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Madsen OR, Egsmose C, Sørensen OH (2002) Bone quality and bone mass assessed by quantitative ultrasound and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in women with rheumatoid arthritis: relationships with quadriceps strength. Ann Rheum Dis 61:325–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Christiansen C (1996) The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction. Osteoporosis Int 6:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenthall L, Tenenhouse A, Caminis J (1995) A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women. Eur J Nucl Med 22:402–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. R. Madsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madsen, O.R., Suetta, C., Egsmose, C. et al. Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices. Clin Rheumatol 23, 324–329 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0920-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0920-9

Keywords

Navigation