Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns of pain in Paget’s disease of bone and their outcomes on treatment with pamidronate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-thirds of patients with Paget’s disease seeking medical attention present with pain. We studied patterns of pagetic pain in relation to physical activity, and the effect of coexistent osteoarthritis (OA)/pagetic arthropathy on pain and physical activity before and after treatment with pamidronate. Patients with lower-segment Paget’s disease (lumbar spine, pelvis or lower limbs), raised alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and pain as a symptom were included. Two subgroups were identified based on the absence (P group), or presence (POA group) of radiological OA in the lower segment. They received 2–4 fortnightly infusions of pamidronate 30–60 mg and were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Outcome measures were visual analog scales for pain at rest, on standing, on walking and at night; standing time, walking distance, 50-yard walking time, and ALP. Twenty-five patients (12 men, 13 women, mean age 70.1±1.9 years), received a mean of 142±9.7 mg of pamidronate. The P group had higher mean ALP (p=0.003) and higher scores for pain (not significant) at baseline than the POA group. Compared to baseline, P group had significant improvements (p<0.01) at 6 months in rest pain, standing pain and walking pain. The POA group had non-significant changes in pain at 6 months. ALP improved significantly at 6 months in both subgroups (p<0.01). The whole group also improved at 6 months in standing time (55.7%, not significant), walking distance (33.9%, not significant), and 50-yard walking time (24.2%, p<0.05). Paget’s patients with coexistent joint disease had less severe pain and bone disease at baseline than those without coexistent joint disease, and responded less well to pamidronate, although they did have significant improvement in ALP levels. Radiographic assessment for coexisting joint disease prior to treatment might improve prognostication from the patient’s point of view, and improve treatment compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALP:

alkaline phosphatase

OA:

Osteoarthritis

References

  1. Barker DJP (1984) The epidemiology of Paget’s disease of bone. Br Med Bull 40:396–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiegs RD (1997) Paget’s disease of bone: indications for treatment and goals of therapy. Clin Ther 19:1309–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamdy RC, Moore S, LeRoy J (1993) Clinical presentation of Paget’s disease of the bone in older patients. South Med J 86:1097–1100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Winfield J, Stamp TC (1984) Bone and joint symptoms in Paget’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis 43:769–773

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bombassei GJ, Yocono M, Raisz LG (1994) Effects of intravenous pamidronate therapy on Paget’s disease of bone. Am J Med Sci 308:226–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wimalawansa SJ, Gunasekara RD (1993) Pamidronate is effective for Paget’s disease of bone refractory to conventional therapy. Calcif Tissue Int 53:237–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gutteridge DH, Retallack RW, Ward LC et al. (1996) Clinical, biochemical, hematalogic, and radiographic responses in Paget’s disease following intravenous pamidronate disodium: a 2-year study. Bone 19:387–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trombetti A, Arlot M, Thevenon J, Uebelhart B, Meunier PJ (1999) Effect of multiple intravenous pamidronate courses in Paget’s disease of bone. Rev Rhum (Engl Ed) 66:467–476

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyles KW, Lammers JE, Shipp KM et al. (1995) Functional and mobility impairments associated with Paget’s disease of bone. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:502–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitton A, McTavish D (1991) Pamidronate. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in resorptive bone disease. Drugs 41:289–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flores RH, Hochberg MC (1998) Definition and classification of osteoarthritis. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds. Osteoarthritis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1–12

  12. Ibbertson HK, Henley JW, Fraser TR et al. (1979) Paget’s disease of bone – clinical evaluation and treatment with diphosphonate. Aust NZ J Med 9:31–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanis JA (1998) Pathophysiology and treatment of Paget’s disease of bone, 2nd edn. London, Martin Dunitz, 111–113

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kathleen Greenwood, research secretary, Department of Rheumatology, Wrightington Hospital, who helped with data processing; and Andy Vail, biostatistician, Research & Development, Hope Hospital, Salford, for advice on data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sreekanth Vasireddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasireddy, S., Talwalkar, A., Miller, H. et al. Patterns of pain in Paget’s disease of bone and their outcomes on treatment with pamidronate. Clin Rheumatol 22, 376–380 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-003-0762-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-003-0762-x

Keywords

Navigation