Abstract
The mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing sand-well interface are essential for the stability of hydrate reservoir, the stability of exploitation well and the safe exploitation of hydrate. However, hydrate decomposition and interface roughness evolution change the mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing sand-well interface, which causes the futility of conventional mechanical properties analysis methods. Based on the self-designed test device, a series of shear tests were carried out considering hydrate saturation, hydrate dissociation, and interface roughness. The results show that the interfacial shear strength, cohesion, and dilatancy of hydrate-bearing samples and hydrate-decomposed samples increase with the increase of interfacial roughness and hydrate saturation. After the dissolution of hydrate, the shear strength, cohesion, and dilatancy of the interface decrease, and the weakening behavior becomes more obvious with the increase of interface roughness and hydrate saturation. In addition, based on the statistical damage theory and Duncan-Chang interface constitutive model, a mechanical model of hydrate-bearing sand-well interface is proposed. The results show that the model is in good agreement with the experimental results, and the model can better simulate the stress-displacement relationship of the sample under different conditions. The research results can provide reference for the stability evaluation of hydrate-bearing reservoirs and exploitation wells in the exploitation process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.
References
Brandt JRT (1985) Behaviour of soil-concrete interfaces
Collett T, Bahk JJ, Baker R et al (2015) Methane hydrates in nature current knowledge and challenges. J Chem Eng Data 60(2):319–329. https://doi.org/10.1021/je500604h
Dangayach S, Singh DN, Kumar P et al (2015) Thermal instability of gas hydrate bearing sediments: some issues. Mar Pet Geol 67:653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.05.034
David Frost J, Martinez A (2018) Interface shear response of JSC-1A, GRC-3, and JSC-Mars1 regolith simulants. J Aerosp Eng 31(2):04018003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000828
De Gennaro V, Frank R (2002) Elasto-plastic analysis of the interface behaviour between granular media and structure. Comput Geotech 29(7):547–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00010-1
Desai CS, Ma Y (1992) Modelling of joints and interfaces using the disturbed-state concept. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 16(9):623–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610160903
Desai CS, Zaman MM, Lightner JG et al (1984) Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 8(1):19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610080103
Dove JE, Frost JD (1999) Peak friction behavior of smooth geomembrane-particle interfaces. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 125(7):544–555. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:7(544)
Fleming IR, Sharma JS, Jogi MB (2006) Shear strength of geomembrane–soil interface under unsaturated conditions. Geotext Geomembr 24(5):274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.009
Frost JD, DeJong JT, Recalde M (2002) Shear failure behavior of granular–continuum interfaces. Eng Fract Mech 69(17):2029–2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00075-9
Ghiassian H, Grozic JLH (2013) Strength behavior of methane hydrate bearing sand in undrained triaxial testing. Mar Pet Geol 43:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.01.007
Hyodo M, Li YH, Yoneda J et al (2014) Effects of dissociation on the shear strength and deformation behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Mar Pet Geol 51:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.11.015
Hyodo M, Wu Y, Nakashima K et al (2017) Influence of fines content on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 122(10):7511–7524. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014154
Hyodo M, Yoneda J, Yoshimoto N et al (2013) Mechanical and dissociation properties of methane hydrate-bearing sand in deep seabed. Soils Found 53(2):299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.02.010
Jin ZH, Yang Q, Chen C et al (2018) Experimental study on effects of the roughness on mechanical behaviors of concrete-sand interface. Chin Rock Mech Eng 37(3):754–765. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1311
Kumar P, Sonawane AK (2004) Engineering significance and consequences of gas hydrates in deep and ultra deep water development. The Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro
Lemos LJL, Vaughan PR (2009) Clay–interface shear resistance. Selected papers on geotechnical engineering by PR Vaughan (Thomas Telford Publishing):392–401
Li B, Li XS, Li G (2014) Kinetic studies of methane hydrate formation in porous media based on experiments in a pilot-scale hydrate simulator and a new model. Chem Eng Sci 105:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.11.016
Li JW, Zhang Y, Di SJ et al (2023) Research on hydrate-bearing reservoir deformation and wellbore wall stability during natural gas hydrate exploitation. Geomech Energy Environ 34:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2023.100458
Li YH, Liu WG, Zhu YM et al (2016) Mechanical behaviors of permafrost-associated methane hydrate-bearing sediments under different mining methods. Appl Energy 162:1627–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.11.016
Li ZM, Zhou YD, Chen J et al (2022) Modified statistical damage constitutive model for frozen sand based on nonlinear strength criterion. KSCE J Civ Eng 26:4467–4477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-2096-8
Lijith KP, Malagar BRC, Singh DN (2019) A comprehensive review on the geomechanical properties of gas hydrate bearing sediments. Mar Pet Geol 104:270–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.024
Liu ZC, Dai S, Ning FL et al (2018) Strength estimation for hydrate-bearing sediments from direct shear tests of hydrate-bearing sand and silt. Geophys Res Lett 45(2):715–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076374
Liu ZC, Wei HZ, Peng L et al (2017) An easy and efficient way to evaluate mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments: the direct shear test. J Petrol Sci Eng 149:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.09.040
Long Y, Chen JH, Zhang JS (2017) Introduction and analysis of a strain-softening damage model for soil–structure interfaces considering shear thickness. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(7):2634–2640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0476-2
Maghsoodi S, Cuisinier O, Masrouri F (2020) Effect of temperature on the cyclic behavior of clay–structure interface. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002360
Miyazaki K, Tenma N, Aoki K et al (2011) Effects of confining pressure on mechanical properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment in triaxial compression test. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 21(02)
Moridis GJ, Collett TS, Pooladi-Darvish M et al (2011) Challenges, uncertainties, and issues facing gas production from gas-hydrate deposits. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 14(01):76–112. https://doi.org/10.2118/131792-PA
Nasir O, Fall M (2008) Shear behaviour of cemented pastefill-rock interfaces. Eng Geol 101(3–4):146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.04.010
Porcino D, Pedroni S, Fioravante V et al (2003) Interface behavior of sands from constant normal stiffness direct shear tests. Geotech Test J 26(3):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11308J
Pra-ai S, Boulon M (2017) Soil–structure cyclic direct shear tests: a new interpretation of the direct shear experiment and its application to a series of cyclic tests. Acta Geotech 12(1):107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0456-6
Seol J, Lee H (2013) Natural gas hydrate as a potential energy resource: from occurrence to production. Korean J Chem Eng 30(4):771–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0033-8
Shakir RR, Zhu JG (2009) Behavior of compacted clay-concrete interface. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China 3(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-009-0013-6
Shen S, Li YH, Sun X et al (2021) Analysis of the mechanical properties of methane hydrate-bearing sands with various pore pressures and confining pressures. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 87:103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103786
Song YC, Zhu YM, Liu WG et al (2014) Experimental research on the mechanical properties of methane hydrate-bearing sediments during hydrate dissociation. Mar Pet Geol 51:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.11.017
Tsubakihara Y, Kishida H (1993) Frictional behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses. Soils Found 33(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_1
Waite WF, Santamarina JC, Cortes DD et al (2009) Physical properties of hydrate‐bearing sediments. Rev Geophys 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000279
Xia HC, Zhou GQ, Du ZC (2011) Experimental study on shear mechanical characteristics of soil-structure interface under different normal stress. Advanced Materials Research 1269:243–249. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.2332
Xia HC, Zhou GQ, Shang XY (2007) Statistical damage softening constitutive model of soil-structure interface based on weibull random distribution. J China Univ Min Technol 36(6):734
Yoneda J, Kakumoto M, Miyazaki K et al (2014) Evaluation of frictional properties for methane-hydrate-well completion and production. SPE Drill Complet 29:115–124. https://doi.org/10.2118/169897-PA
Zhang MY, Sang SK, Wang YH et al (2020) Factors influencing the mechanical characteristics of a pile–soil interface in clay soil. Front Earth Sci 7:364. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00364
Zhang XH, Luo DS, Lu XB et al (2018) Mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments during hydrate dissociation. Theoret Appl Mech 34(2):9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-017-0699-y
Zhang XH, Lu XB, Zhang LM et al (2012) Experimental study on mechanical properties of methane-hydrate-bearing sediments. Acta Mech Sin 28(5):1356–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0142-3
Zhang Y, Hou ZS, Li JW et al (2023) Experimental and model study on the weakening of gas hydrate-bearing sand considering dissociation. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 5(59):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00608-1
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the two reviewers and the editor for their kind advice, which has significantly enhanced the soundness of this paper.
Funding
The financial support was provided by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51890914; No. 52179119).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Lin, L. et al. Study on the shear mechanics of gas hydrate-bearing sand-well interface with different roughness and dissociation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 82, 404 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03432-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03432-9