Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The uncertainty of landslide susceptibility prediction modeling: suitability of linear conditioning factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For linear conditioning factors such as rivers, roads, and geological faults, existing studies mainly use buffer analysis in Geographic Information System to obtain discrete variables such as distance to rivers and roads. These discrete variables have random fluctuations and are sensitive to the errors of point or line elements, leading to a decrease of landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) accuracy. This study proposes continuous conditioning factors such as river density and road density to improve the suitability of the linear factors. Xunwu County in China is taken as an example; 337 historical landslides and 12 conditioning factors are acquired. First, the distance to rivers and roads and other 10 conditioning factors together constitute the original factors of LSP. Second, the distance to rivers and distance to roads are replaced by the road density and river density, respectively, to constitute the improved factors. Third, based on the support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF), original factor- and improved factor-based SVM, LR, and RF models are constructed for comparisons. Finally, the LSP uncertainty is evaluated. Results show that (1) the improved factor-based models have higher LSP accuracies than original factor-based models, indicating that density factors are more feasible than linear factors with more explicit physical meaning; (2) landslide susceptibility indexes distribution features indicate that improved factor-based models reduce the uncertainty of LSP; (3) spatial density factors do not reduce the importance of conditioning factors in both original factor- and improved factor-based models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Lombardo L (2019a) Comparative assessment using boosted regression trees, binary logistic regression, frequency ratio and numerical risk factor for gully erosion susceptibility modelling. CATENA 183:104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K, Lee C-W (2019b) Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical-and artificial intelligence-based FR–RF integrated model and multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sensing 11:999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Saha S, Roy J, Chen W, Blaschke T, Tien Bui D (2020) Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the Gallicash River Watershed. Iran Remote Sensing 12:475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barella CF, Sobreira FG, Zezere JL (2019) A comparative analysis of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping in the southeast region of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:3205–3221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1341-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang ZL, Du Z, Zhang F, Huang FM, Chen JW, Li WB, Guo ZZ (2020) Landslide susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing images and GIS: comparisons of supervised and unsupervised machine learning models. Remote Sensing 12:502. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Naghibi SA (2018) A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps produced using support vector machine with different kernel functions and entropy data mining models in China. Bull Eng Geol Env 77:647–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conforti M, Ietto F (2020) Influence of tectonics and morphometric features on the landslide distribution: a case study from the Mesima Basin (Calabria, South Italy). Journal of Earth Science 31:393–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-019-1231-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsini A, Mulas M (2017) Use of ROC curves for early warning of landslide displacement rates in response to precipitation (Piagneto landslide, Northern Apennines, Italy). Landslides 14:1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0781-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criss RE, Yao WM, Li CD, Tang HM (2020) A predictive, two-parameter model for the movement of reservoir landslides. Journal of Earth Science 31:1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1331-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagdelenler G, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C (2016) Modification of seed cell sampling strategy for landslide susceptibility mapping: an application from the Eastern part of the Gallipoli Peninsula (Canakkale, Turkey). Bull Eng Geol Env 75:575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0759-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai C, Li WL, Wang D, Lu HY, Xu Q, Jian J (2021) Active landslide detection based on Sentinel-1 Data and InSAR technology in Zhouqu County, Gansu Province, Northwest China. Journal of Earth Science 32:1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1380-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang VH, Dieu TB, Tran XL, Hoang ND (2019) Enhancing the accuracy of rainfall-induced landslide prediction along mountain roads with a GIS-based random forest classifier. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:2835–2849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1273-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou J, Yunus AP, Dieu Tien B, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen C-W, Khosravi K, Yang Y, Binh Thai P (2019) Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan. Sci Total Environ 662:332–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du GL, Zhang YS, Yang ZH, Guo CB, Yao X, Sun DY (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the region of eastern Himalayan syntaxis, Tibetan Plateau, China: a comparison between analytical hierarchy process information value and logistic regression-information value methods. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:4201–4215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1393-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z, Wang Y, Niu R, Peng L (2021) Landslide susceptibility prediction based on positive unlabeled learning coupled with adaptive sampling. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 14:11581–11592. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3125741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felicísimo ÁM, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quirós E (2012) Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides 10:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayen A, Saha S (2018) Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: a tributary of Ajay River. Spat Inf Res 26:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Guthrie RH, Brenning A (2011) Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology 129:376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Shi Y, Huang F, Fan X, Huang J (2021) Landslide susceptibility zonation method based on C5. 0 decision tree and K-means cluster algorithms to improve the efficiency of risk management. Geosci Front 101249

  • He XL, Xu C, Qi WW, Huang YD, Cheng J, Xu XW, Yao Q, Lu YK, Dai BY (2021) Landslides triggered by the 2020 Qiaojia M(w)5.1 Earthquake, Yunnan, China: distribution, influence factors and tectonic significance. Journal of Earth Science 32:1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1492-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Cao Z, Guo J, Jiang S-H, Li S, Guo Z (2020a) Comparisons of heuristic, general statistical and machine learning models for landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping. CATENA 191:104580

  • Huang F, Cao Z, Jiang S-H, Zhou C, Huang J, Guo Z (2020b) Landslide susceptibility prediction based on a semi-supervised multiple-layer perceptron model. Landslides 17:2919–2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Huang J, Jiang S, Zhou C (2017a) Landslide displacement prediction based on multivariate chaotic model and extreme learning machine. Eng Geol 218:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Tao S, Chang Z, Huang J, Fan X, Jiang S-H, Li W (2021a) Efficient and automatic extraction of slope units based on multi-scale segmentation method for landslide assessments. Landslides 18:3715–3731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Yan J, Fan X, Yao C, Huang J, Chen W, Hong H (2021b) Uncertainty pattern in landslide susceptibility prediction modelling: effects of different landslide boundaries and spatial shape expressions. Geosci Front 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021b.101317

  • Huang F, Yin K, Huang J, Gui L, Wang P (2017b) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on self-organizing-map network and extreme learning machine. Eng Geol 223:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Zhang J, Zhou C, Wang Y, Huang J, Zhu L (2020c) A deep learning algorithm using a fully connected sparse autoencoder neural network for landslide susceptibility prediction. Landslides 17:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang FM, Ye Z, Jiang SH, Huang JS, Chang ZL, Chen JW (2021c) Uncertainty study of landslide susceptibility prediction considering the different attribute interval numbers of environmental factors and different data-based models. CATENA 202:105250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhao L (2018) Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. CATENA 165:520–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS (2014) Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens Environ 152:150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Fan W, Yu N, Liu E (2021) Spatial modeling of gully head erosion on the Loess Plateau using a certainty factor and random forest model. Sci Total Environ 783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147040

  • Jiang S-H, Huang J, Huang F, Yang J, Yao C, Zhou C-B (2018) Modelling of spatial variability of soil undrained shear strength by conditional random fields for slope reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 63:374–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-J, Park I, Lee S (2015) Forecasting and validation of landslide susceptibility using an integration of frequency ratio and neuro-fuzzy models: a case study of Seorak mountain area in Korea. Environmental Earth Sciences 74:413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li QN, Huang D, Pei SF, Qiao JP, Wang M (2021a) Using physical model experiments for hazards assessment of rainfall-induced debris landslides. Journal of Earth Science 32:1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1398-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Fan X, Huang F, Chen W, Hong H, Huang J, Guo Z (2020) Uncertainties analysis of collapse susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing and GIS: influences of different data-based models and connections between collapses and environmental factors. Remote Sensing 12:4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Shi Y, Huang F, Hong H, Song G (2021b) Uncertainties of collapse susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing and GIS: effects of different machine learning models. Front Earth Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021b.731058

  • Liu L-L, Yang C, Huang F-M, Wang X-M (2021) Landslide susceptibility mapping by attentional factorization machines considering feature interactions. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12:1837–1861. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1950217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wan S, Huang F, Luo X, Fu M (2019) Experimental study of subsurface erosion in granitic under the conditions of different soil column angles and flow discharges. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:5877–5888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01519-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo L, Mai PM (2018) Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Eng Geol 244:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsengiyumva JB, Luo G, Amanambu AC, Mind’je R, Habiyaremye G, Karamage F, Ochege FU, Mupenzi C (2019) Comparing probabilistic and statistical methods in landslide susceptibility modeling in Rwanda/Centre-Eastern Africa. Sci Total Environ 659:1457–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Zhang ZM, He GJ, Wei MY (2019) An improved GrabCut method based on a visual attention model for rare-earth ore mining area recognition with high-resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sensing 11:987. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N (2016) Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province. Iran Environmental Earth Sciences 75:185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4950-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Kerle N, Shabani F (2020) Investigating the effects of different landslide positioning techniques, landslide partitioning approaches, and presence-absence balances on landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 187:104364

  • Qin C-Z, Bao L-L, Zhu A-X, Wang R-X, Hu X-M (2013) Uncertainty due to DEM error in landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27:1364–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi-Termeh SV, Shirani K, Pasandi M (2021) Mapping of landslide susceptibility using the combination of neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), ant colony (ANFIS-ACOR), and differential evolution (ANFIS-DE) models. Bull Eng Geol Env 80:2045–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02048-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S (2020) Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena 186:104249

  • Shahabi H, Khezri S, Ahmad BB, Hashim M (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: a comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. CATENA 115:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Spiekermann R, Betts H, Neverman AJ (2021) Comparing methods of landslide data acquisition and susceptibility modelling: examples from New Zealand. Geomorphology 381:107660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun DL, Xu JH, Wen HJ, Wang Y (2020a) An optimized random forest model and its generalization ability in landslide susceptibility mapping: application in two areas of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Journal of Earth Science 31:1068–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1072-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Chen J, Han X, Bao Y, Zhou X, Peng W (2020b) Landslide susceptibility mapping along the upper Jinsha River, south-western China: a comparison of hydrological and curvature watershed methods for slope unit classification. Bull Eng Geol Env 79:4657–4670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun XH, Chen JP, Han XD, Bao YD, Zhan JW, Peng W (2020c) Application of a GIS-based slope unit method for landslide susceptibility mapping along the rapidly uplifting section of the upper Jinsha River, South-Western China. Bull Eng Geol Env 79:533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01572-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang RX, Kulatilake P, Yan EC, Cai JS (2020) Evaluating landslide susceptibility based on cluster analysis, probabilistic methods, and artificial neural networks. Bull Eng Geol Env 79:2235–2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01684-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Hong H, Chen W, Xu C (2017) Applying information theory and GIS-based quantitative methods to produce landslide susceptibility maps in Nancheng County, China. Landslides 14:1091–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XL, Zhang LQ, Wang SJ, Lari S (2014) Regional landslide susceptibility zoning with considering the aggregation of landslide points and the weights of factors. Landslides 11:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0392-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Duan H, Hong H (2019) A comparative study of composite kernels for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Yongxin County. China CATENA 183:104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang D, Guo Q, Wang D (2020) Regional landslide hazard assessment through integrating susceptibility index and rainfall process. Nat Hazards 104:2153–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04265-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Were K, Bui DT, Dick ØB, Singh BR (2015) A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. Ecol Ind 52:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dai F, Xu X, Lee YH (2012) GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology 145:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Liu R, Yang M, Chen J, Liu T, Yang Y, Chen W, Wang Y (2021) Incorporating landslide spatial information and correlated features among conditioning factors for landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sensing 13:2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Sun G, Zheng H, Qi Y (2019) Investigation of the sequential excavation of a soil-rock-mixture slope using the numerical manifold method. Eng Geol 256:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Sun G, Zheng H, Yan C (2020a) An improved numerical manifold method with multiple layers of mathematical cover systems for the stability analysis of soil-rock-mixture slopes. Eng Geol 264:105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Xu D, Liu F, Zheng H (2020b) Modeling the entire progressive failure process of rock slopes using a strength-based criterion. Comput Geotech 126:103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Chen F, Xu C, Wang L, Wang N (2021) Matrix SegNet: a practical deep learning framework for landslide mapping from images of different areas with different spatial resolutions. Remote Sensing 13:3158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JL, Vanmaercke M, Chen LQ, Govers G (2016) Vegetation cover and topography rather than human disturbance control gully density and sediment production on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geomorphology 274:92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Wang G, Huang F, Li Y, Hong H (2021) Landslide susceptibility prediction using sparse feature extraction and machine learning models based on GIS and remote sensing. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett PP:1–5

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41807285, 52179103, 41867036 and 41972280), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020T130274, 20212BAB204054), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No.20192BAB216034), and the Jiangxi Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation (NO. 2019KY08).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China

    Faming Huang, Lihan Pan, Shui-Hua Jiang & Chuangbing Zhou

  2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan, China

    Xuanmei Fan

  3. Discipline of Civil, Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Jinsong Huang

Authors
  1. Faming Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lihan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuanmei Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shui-Hua Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinsong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chuangbing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shui-Hua Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, F., Pan, L., Fan, X. et al. The uncertainty of landslide susceptibility prediction modeling: suitability of linear conditioning factors. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02672-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02672-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation