Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of chemical solutions on the hydromechanical behavior of a laterite/bentonite mixture used as an engineered barrier

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compacted laterite and bentonite, as well as a mixture of the two, are strongly impermeable and can effectively prevent the migration and diffusion of contaminants. This study explored the feasibility of employing a laterite/bentonite mixture as a vertical barrier in landfills, tailings ponds, or sites contaminated by heavy metals. Permeability tests using chemical solutions of different concentrations and compression tests were performed on mixed bentonite/laterite samples with different dry densities and mixing ratios. The permeability and consolidation characteristics were verified using scanning electron microscopy. The hydraulic conductivity of the laterite samples decreased with increased dry density, and the hydraulic conductivity of the mixed-soil samples decreased with increased bentonite content. Adding bentonite significantly improved seepage control performance. The hydraulic conductivity of the pure laterite was 4.7 × 10−7 cm/s, whereas that of the laterite sample mixed with 20% bentonite was 1.6 × 10−8 cm/s. The compacted laterite with a dry density of 1.5 g/cm3 was demonstrated to satisfy the permeability specifications to serve as a landfill seepage control system. When the concentration of the heavy metal or salt solutions increased, the laterite flocculation increased, and the hydraulic conductivity decreased. The laterite in the mixed soil samples substantially affected these characteristics, particularly decreasing the hydraulic conductivity. As the concentration of the chemical solutions increased, the yield stress of the compacted samples and the compression index decreased, and the compression performance improved. These findings indicate that chemical solutions significantly affect the hydromechanical behavior of a laterite/bentonite mixture used as an engineered barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baille W, Tripathy S, Schanz T (2010) Swelling pressures and one-dimensional compressibility behavior of bentonite at large pressures. Appl Clay Sci 48(3):324–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour SL, Fredlund DG (1989) Mechanisms of osmotic flow and volume change in clay soils. Can Geotech J 26(4):551–562

    Google Scholar 

  • CCTV (2017) Focus interview - dangerous tailings pond (2016), cctv.com. http://tv.cctv.com

  • Chai JC, Sari K, Shen SL, Cai YQ (2016) Predicting self-healing ratio of GCL with a damage hole. Geotext Geomembr 44(5):761–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YM (2014) A fundamental theory of environmental geotechnics and its application. Chin J Geotech Eng 36(1):1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YG, Lei HL, He Y, Ye WM (2018) Experimental study of permeability of bentonite-laterite mixtures for salt solutions. J Central South Univ (Sci Technol) 49(4):910–915

    Google Scholar 

  • CJJ 176-2012 (2012) Technical specification for geotechnical engineering of sanitary landfill, Chinese standard

  • Day SR (1994) The compatibility of slurry cutoff wall materials with contaminated groundwater. Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soils. ASTM STP 1142. David E. Danial and Stephen J. Trautwein, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia

  • Deng YF, Cui YJ, Tang AM, Li XL, Sillen X (2012) An experimental study on the secondary deformation of boom clay. Appl Clay Sci 59–60:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Du YJ, Fan RD (2011) Compressibility and permeability behavior of two types of amended soil-bentonite vertical cutoff wall backfills. Rock Soil Mech 32(S1):49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Du YJ, Fan RD, Liu SY, Reddy KR, Jin F (2015) Workability, compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of zeolite-amended clayey soil/calcium-bentonite backfills for slurry-trench cutoff walls. Eng Geol 195:258–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta J, Mishra AK (2016) Consolidation behavior of bentonites in the presence of salt solutions. Appl Clay Sci 120:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan RD, Du YJ, Reddy KR, Liu SY, Yang YL (2014) Compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of clayey soil mixed with calcium bentonite for slurry wall backfill: initial assessment. Appl Clay Sci 101:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin SL, Hayles CS (1999) The chemical compatibility of cement-bentonite cut-off wall material. Constr Build Mater 13:329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra AM, Cui YJ, He Y, Delage P, Mokni N, Tang AM, Aimedieu P, Bornert M, Bernier F (2019) Characterization of water retention, compressibility and swelling properties of a pellet/powder bentonite mixture. Eng Geol 248:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Ye WM, Chen YG (2016) Influence of pore fluid concentration on water retention properties of compacted GMZ01 bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 129:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Li BB, Zhang KN (2019a) Ye W.M. experimental and numerical study on heavy metal contaminant migration and retention behavior of engineered barrier in tailings pond. Environ Pollut 252:1010–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Zhang KN, Wu DY (2019b) Experimental and modeling study of soil water retention curves of compacted bentonite considering salt solution effects. Geofluids 2019(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Ye WM, Chen YG, Zhang KN, Wu DY (2019c) Effects of NaCl solutions on the swelling and shrinkage behavior of compacted bentonite under one-dimensional conditions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Ye WM, Chen YG, Cui YJ (2019d) Effects of K+ solutions on swelling behavior of compacted GMZ bentonite. Eng Geol 249:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Li Z, Zhang KN, Ye WM, Chen YG (2020) Effect of CuSO4 on the Hydromechanical behavior of compacted tailings. Mine Water Environ 39:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong CS, Shackelford CD, Malusis MA (2012) Consolidation and hydraulic conductivity of zeolite-amended soil-bentonite backfills. J Geotech Geoenviron 138(1):15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk S, Yangsukkaseam N, Chinkulkijniwat A, Du YJ (2011) Compressibility and permeability of Bangkok clay compared with kaolinite and bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 52(1–2):150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshik K, Kechavarzi C, Sutherland K, Soga K, Tedd P (2010) Laboratory and in situ tests for long-term hydraulic conductivity of a cement-bentonite cutoff wall. J Geotech Geoenviron 136(4):562–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Malusis MA, Mckleehan MD (2013) Chemical compatibility of model soil-bentonite backfill containing multi-swellable bentonite. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(2):189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokni N (2011) Deformation and flow driven by osmotic processes in porous materials. Technical University of Catalunya, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon S, Nam K, Kim JK, Hwan SK, Chung M (2008) Effectiveness of compacted soil liner as a gas barrier layer in the landfill final cover system. Waste Manag 28:1909–1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandini TLC, Leite AL (2015) Characterization and hydraulic conductivity of tropical soils and bentonite mixtures for CCL purposes. Eng Geol 196:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayanthika IVK, Jayawardana DT, Bandara NJGJ, Manage PM, Madushanka RMTD (2018) Effective use of iron-aluminum rich laterite based soil mixture for treatment of landfill leachate. Waste Manag 74:347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintado X, Romero E, Suriol J, Lloret A, Madhusudhan BN (2019) Small-strain shear stiffness of compacted bentonites for engineered barrier system. Geomechan Energy Environ 18:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards S, Dawson J, Stutter M (2019) The potential use of natural vs commercial bio sorbent material to remediate stream waters by removing heavy metal contaminants. J Environ Manag 231:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasamoto H, Isogai T, Kikuchi H, Satoh H, Svensson D (2017) Mineralogical, physical and chemical investigation of compacted Kunigel V1 bentonite in contact with a steel heater in the ABM test package 1 experiment, Äspö laboratory, Sweden. Clay Miner 52(1):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun DA, You G, Zhou AN, Sheng DC (2016) Soil–water retention curves and microstructures of undisturbed and compacted Guilin lateritic clay. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:781–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Taheri S, Ebadi T, Maknoon R, Amiri M (2018) Predicting variations in the permeability and strength parameters of a sand-bentonite mixture (SBM) contaminated simultaneously with lead (II) and diesel. Appl Clay Sci 157:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan LR, Kong LW (2001) Fundamental property and microstructure model of red clay. Chin J Geotech Eng 23(4):458–462 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang B (2017) Study on the migration pattern and environmental effect of heavy metal in the soil of the metallic tailings area in southern Shanxi Province. Xi 'an university of science and technology, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Evaluation of subsurface engineered barriers at waste sites EPA542 R98 005. US EPA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar MV, Lloret A (2004) Influence of temperature on the hydromechanical behavior of a compacted bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 26:337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Bian M, Li CF, Wu XH, Wang Z (2018) Effects of calcium concentration and differential settlement on permeability characteristics of bentonite-sand mixtures. Appl Clay Sci 153:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu HQ, Shu S, Wang SW, Zhou AZ, Jiang PM, Zhu W, Fan XH, Chen L (2019) Studies on the chemical compatibility of soil-bentonite cut-off walls for landfills. J Environ Manag 237:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye WM, Zhang F, Chen B, Chen YG, Wang Q, Cui YJ (2014) Effects of salt solutions on the hydromechanical behavior of compacted GMZ01 Bentonite. Environ Earth Sci 72:2621–2630

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo SS, Shackelford CD, Evans JC (2005) Consolidation and hydraulic conductivity of nine model soil-bentonite backfills. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(10):1189–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Li JZ, He Y (2020) Experimental study on viscoplastic property of unsaturated reticulate red clay used as an engineered barrier. Geofluids 9:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Xu HQ, Wang SW, Fan XH (2016) Influence of CaCl2 solution on the permeability of different clay-based cutoff walls. Rock Soil Mech 37(5):1224–1230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41807253) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Project No. 2019JJ50763) for their financial support. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Research Fund Program of the Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering (Tongji University), Ministry of Education (Project No. KLE-TJGE-B1803), the Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring (Central South University), Ministry of Education (Project No. 2018YSJS12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Wang, Mm., Wu, Dy. et al. Effects of chemical solutions on the hydromechanical behavior of a laterite/bentonite mixture used as an engineered barrier. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 1169–1180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02003-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02003-6

Keywords

Navigation