Skip to main content
Log in

Stability analysis of a group of underground anhydrite caverns used for crude oil storage considering rock tensile properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tensile deformation and damage play an essential role in rock engineering problems. This paper presents a framework for evaluating the stability of a group of anhydrite caverns combining both experimental and numerical methods. In this study, the tensile Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of anhydrite are determined based on the Brazilian disc splitting test. The tests show that the tensile Young’s modulus of anhydrite is less than the compressive Young’s modulus, with a ratio of approximately 0.58–0.91. The tensile Poisson’s ratio is greater than the compressive Poisson’s ratio, with a ratio of approximately 2.47–3.20. Based on the differences between the mechanical parameters (Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio) of anhydrite in the tensile and compressive states, a user-defined constitutive model is developed with the Hoek-Brown failure criterion, which describes the tensile and compressive behaviour at a laboratory scale. Finally, a large-scale three-dimensional (3D) anhydrite cavern group located in Anhui Province, China, which was formed by mining activity over the past 10 years, is used as a case study to illustrate the proposed framework. The model for the anhydrite cavern group is established in FLAC3D5.0, and the stability of the anhydrite cavern group used for underground oil storage is then analysed with this model. The simulation results indicate that after the exploitation is completed, there are few plastic zones and tensile elements in the surrounding rock near the cavern group. The maximum value of cavern roof settlement is approximately 5.54 mm. The maximum cavern bottom upheaval is approximately 6.11 mm, and the maximum ground subsidence is approximately 3.0 mm. The results indicate that the Anhui Hengtai anhydrite cavern group possesses good stability potential as an underground oil storage space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ x, σ y, σ z, σ xy, σ xz, σ yz :

are normal stress and shear stress in respective directions in a 3D Cartesian coordinate system (MPa);

σ 1, σ 2, σ 3 :

are the maximum, intermediate and minimum principal stresses, respectively (MPa);

ε x, ε x, ε x, γ xy, γ xz, γ yz :

are normal strain and shear strain in respective directions;

p :

is the applied load during the Brazilian disc splitting test (kN);

G xy, G xz, G yz :

are shear modulus in respective directions (GPa);

E c :

is the compressive Young’s modulus (GPa);

E t :

is the tensile Poisson’s ratio (GPa);

μ c :

is the compressive Poisson’s ratio;

μ t :

is the tensile Poisson’s ratio;

E x :

is the Young’s modulus in the x direction. When normal stress is used, Ex = Ec; otherwise, Ex = Et (GPa);

E y :

is the Young’s modulus in the y direction. When normal stress is used, Ey = Ec; otherwise, Ey = Et (GPa);

E z :

is the Young’s modulus in the z direction. When the normal stress is pressed, Ez = Ec; otherwise, Ez = Et (GPa);

μ x :

is the lateral deformation in the y and z directions that is caused by the normal stress in the x direction. When the normal stress is subjected to compressive stress in the x direction, μx = μc; otherwise, μx = μt;

μ y :

is the lateral deformation in the x and z directions that is caused by the normal stress in the y direction. When the normal stress is subjected to compressive stress in the y direction, μy = μc; otherwise, μy = μt;

μ z :

is the lateral deformation in the x and y directions that is caused by the normal stress in the z direction. When the normal stress is subjected to compressive stress in the z direction, μz = μc; otherwise, μz = μt;

k 1, k 2 :

are the slope of the stress–strain curves in the x and y directions, respectively, in the Brazilian disc splitting test (103/m2);

σ c :

is the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS; MPa);

\( {\sigma}_3^{cv} \) :

is the user-prescribed level of confining stress (MPa);

E cRM :

is the Young’s modulus of an anhydrite rock mass (GPa);

σ tRM :

is the tensile strength of an anhydrite rock mass (MPa);

D, m i, m b, s, a :

are the Hoek-Brown failure criterion parameters;

\( \Delta {e}_1^p,\Delta {e}_3^p \) :

are the plastic strain increment in two directions;

γ :

is the plastic factor in the plastic flow rule;

γ rf, γ af, γ cv :

are the plastic factors in the radial flow rule, constant-volume flow rule and composite flow rule, respectively.

References

  • Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2005) Relation between the Mogi and the Coulomb failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:431–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Mishra DA, Roychowdhury K (2013) Rock failure modes under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:457–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaise A, André S, Delobelle P, Meshaka Y, Cunat C (2016) Advantages of a 3-parameter reduced constitutive model for the measurement of polymers elastic modulus using tensile tests. Mech Time-Depend Mater 20(4):553–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossart P, Meier PM, Moeri A, Trick T, Mayor JC (2002) Geological and hydraulic characterization of the excavation disturbed zone in the Opalinus Clay of the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory. Eng Geol 66(1–2):19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CS, Pan E, Amadei B (1998) Determination of deformability and tensile strength of anisotropic rock using Brazilian tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZJ, Wang LH, Jin J, Huang Q, Gong JW (2015) Compressive research of Brazilian splitting and uniaxial compressive tests on three kinds of rock. Water Power 41(11):34–38 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahimifar A, Malekpour M (2012) Experimental and numerical analysis of indirect and direct tensile strength using fracture mechanics concepts. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst C (1964) On the validity of the “Brazilian” test for brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1:535–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng J (2015) Study on surrounding rock stability and optimized layout of underground energy storage in anhydrite. Dissertation, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing. (In Chinese)

  • Fu X, Xie Q, Liang L (2015) Comparison of the Kaiser effect in marble under tensile stresses between the Brazilian and bending tests. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:535–543

    Google Scholar 

  • GB/T 50266-2013 (2013) Standard for test methods of engineering rock mass. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gercek H (2007) Poission’s ratio values for rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh ATC, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Zhang W, Xiao Y (2017) Evaluating stability of underground entry-type excavations using multivariate adaptive regression splines and logistic regression. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 70:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Li XB, Zhao J (2010) Analytical algorithm to estimate tensile modulus in Brazilian disk splitting tests. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(5):881–891 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Aziz NI, Schmidt LC (1993) Rock fracture toughness determination by the Brazilian test. Eng Geol 33:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Brown ET, Rummel F (1972) The controlled failure of rock discs and rings loaded in diametral compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:2241–2248

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2012) Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions (FLAC3D) Online Manual. Constitutive models: theory and implementation, 1–107-108

  • Krech WW, Henderson FA, Hjelmstad KE (1974) A standard rock suite for rapid excavation research report. 16F. US. Bur. Mines. RI 1974. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 11(10):198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekhnitskii SG, Fern P, Brandstatter JJ, Dill EH (1964) Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic body. Phys Today 1(84):84

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Wong LNY (2013) The Brazilian disc test for rock mechanics applications: review and new insights. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(2):269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LC, Tang CA, Zhu WC, Liang ZZ (2009) Numerical analysis of slope stability based on the gravity increase method. Comput Geotech 36(7):1246–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao JJ, Yang MT, Hsieh HY (1997) Direct tensile behavior of the transversely isotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:837–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JF, Chen L, Wang CP, Man K, Wang L, Wang J, Su R (2014) Characterizing the mechanical tensile behavior of Beishan granite with different experimental methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 69:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü Q, Sun HY, Low BK (2011) Reliability analysis of ground-support interaction in circular tunnels using the response surface method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(8):1329–1343

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü Q, Chan CL, Low BK (2012) Probabilistic evaluation of ground-support interaction for deep rock excavation using artificial neural network and uniform design. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 32:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü Q, Chan CL, Low BK (2013) System reliability assessment for a rock tunnel with multiple failure modes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(4):821–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü Q, Xiao ZP, Ji J, Zheng J, Shang YQ (2017) Moving least squares method for reliability assessment of rock tunnel excavation considering ground-support interaction. Comput Geotech 84:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Li XB, Tao M, Dong LJ (2017) Mechanical behavior of rock-shotcrete interface under static and dynamic tensile loads. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 65:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez B, Aubertin M, Saleh-Mbemba F (2015) Determination of the tensile strength of unsaturated tailings using bending tests. Can Geotech J 52:1874–1885

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng ZH, Li JY, Yang S, Wang JC (2013) Feasibility analysis of utilization of waste gypsum mine for crude oil storage. J Eng Geol 21(3):470–475 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao JF, Chau KT, Feng XT (2006) Modelling of anisotropic damage and creep deformation in brittle rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(4):582–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou A, Murphy W (2018) Quantifying the effects of scale and heterogeneity on the confined strength of micro-defected rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 102:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram PN, Corrales JM (1980) Brazilian tensile strength of rocks with different elastic properties in tension and compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 17:131–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttner S, Merklein M (2017) A new approach for the determination of the linear elastic modulus from uniaxial tensile tests of sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 241:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HX, Zhang B, Fu D, Abisai N (2018) Stability and airtightness of a deep anhydrite cavern group used as an underground storage space: a case study. Comput Geotech 96:12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu NX, Zhang JY, Tian H, Mei G, Ge Q (2016a) Discrete element modeling of strata and surface movement induced by mining under open-pit final slope. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 88:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XL, Wu SC, Gao YT, Xu MF (2016b) Effects of micro-structure and micro-parameters on Brazilian tensile strength using flat-joint model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:3575–3595

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang HL, Peng JH (2015) Monitoring urban subsidence with multi-master radar interferometry based on coherent targets. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 43(3):529–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye JH, Wu FQ, Sun JZ (2009) Estimation of the tensile elastic modulus using Brazilian disc by applying diametrically opposed concentrated loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:568–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye JH, Wu FQ, Zhang Y, Ji HG (2012) Estimation of the bi-modulus of materials through deformation measurement in a Brazilian disk test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Wang TX (2004) Study on relationship between splitting behavior and elastic modulus of three Groges granite. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23:3258–3261 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WG, Goh ATC (2013) Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems. Comput Geotech 48:82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XT, Zhang QY, Yuan SB, Wang C, Gao Q (2014) Development of test device for direct axial tension on rock and its application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(12):2517–2553 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Zhang LZ, Yang HL, Zhang ZJ, Tao JL (2016) Subsidence prediction and susceptibility zonation for collapse above goaf with thick alluvial cover: a case study of the Yongcheng coalfield, Henan Province, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1117–1132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41572301, 40902086 and 61427802) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 2-65-2015-071, 2-65-2018-108). Additionally, the authors would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which significantly improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Wang, H., Wang, L. et al. Stability analysis of a group of underground anhydrite caverns used for crude oil storage considering rock tensile properties. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 6249–6265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01497-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01497-z

Keywords

Navigation