Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method of karst tunnels and its engineering application

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tunnel collapse, a large deformation of surrounding rock, water and mud inrush are the main geological disasters in the process of tunnel construction. In order to control the above construction risks, the multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method of karst tunnels is investigated in this study. Firstly, twelve influencing factors are selected as comprehensive risk assessment indexes of the karst tunnel from the aspects of karst hydrogeology and engineering geology conditions, as well as construction factors. The corresponding grading standards of assessment indexes are determined. The tunnel collapse, large deformation of surrounding rock, water and mud inrush, and comprehensive risk assessment index systems are established respectively. Secondly, the unascertained measure analysis for assessment indexes is carried out. The single risk grade and comprehensive risk grade are judged respectively by using credible degree recognition criteria. Thirdly, the most serious geological disaster is ascertained based on the riskiest principle, and then comprehensive risk control theories and technical systems of the karst tunnel can be built. Finally, the established unascertained measure model and the proposed multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method are applied to the risk assessment of the Yichang-Wanzhou Railway Dazhiping tunnel. The assessment results are in good agreement with the site construction conditions. The research results provide an effective approach for comprehensive risk assessment methods of karst tunnels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benardos AG, Kaliampakos DC (2004) A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—Illustrated by the Athens metro, Greece. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(6):987–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi HH, Cho HN, Seo JW (2004) Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 130(2):258–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JJ, Zhou F, Yang JS, Liu BC (2009) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk evaluation of collapse during construction of mountain tunnel. Rock Soil Mech 30(8):2365–2370

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding L, Zhang L, Wu X, Skibniewski MJ, Qunzhou Y (2014) Safety management in tunnel construction: Case study of Wuhan metro construction in China. Saf Sci 62:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskesen SD, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, Veicherts TH (2004) Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International tunnelling association, working group no. 2. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 19(3):217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fall M, Azzam R, Noubactep C (2006) A multi-method approach to study the stability of natural slopes and landslide susceptibility mapping. Eng Geol 82(4):241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellin W, King J, Kirsch A, Oberguggenberger M (2010) Uncertainty modelling and sensitivity analysis of tunnel face stability. Struct Saf 32(6):402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Zavadskas EK (2012) Risk evaluation of tunneling projects. Arch Civ Mech Eng 12(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong ES, Lee IM, Shin HS, Nam SW, Kong JS (2009) Quantitative risk evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: Application to the design of shield TBM. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(3):269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi JK, Shahriar K, Rezai B, Rostami J, Bejari H (2010) Risk assessment based selection of rock TBM for adverse geological conditions using fuzzy-AHP. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69(4):523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He ML, Liu J, Liu L, Zhou J (2012) Unascertained measure model of assessment tunnel collapse risk and its application in engineering. J Tongji University: Nat Sci 43(9):3666–3671

    Google Scholar 

  • He HJ, Su SR, Wang XJ, Li P (2013) Study and application on comprehensive evaluation model of landslide hazard based on uncertainty measure theory. J Tongji University: Nat Sci 44(4):1564–1570

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85(3/4):347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazaras K, Kirytopoulos K, Rentizelas A (2012) Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Saf Sci 50(9):1806–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XH, Jin XG, Lu YY, Lei K, Kang Y (2002) Study on deformation character of surrounding rock masses and numerical modeling of Xishanping tunnel through coal and working out area. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 21(5):667–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Shi SS, Li LP, Zhou ZQ, Guo M, Lei T (2013a) Attribute recognition model and its application of mountain tunnel collapse risk assessment. J Basic Sci Eng 21(1):147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Zhou ZQ, Li LP, Xu ZH, Zhang QQ, Shi SS (2013b) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on attribute synthetic evaluation system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Zhou ZQ, Li LP, Shi SS, Xu ZH (2013c) Risk evaluation theory and method of water and mud inrush in karst tunnels and its application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 32(9):1858–1867

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XP, Li YN (2014) Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS: Case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LP, Lei T, Li SC, Xu ZH, Xue YG, Shi SS (2015) Dynamic risk assessment of water inrush in tunnelling and software development. Geomechanics Eng 9(1):57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Wu J, Xu ZH, Li LP, Huang X, Xue YG, Wang ZC (2016a) Numerical analysis of water flow characteristics after inrushing from the tunnel floor in process of karst tunnel excavation. Geomechanics Eng 10(4):471–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li X, Su Y (2016b) A hybrid approach combining uniform design and support vector machine to probabilistic tunnel stability assessment. Struct Saf 61:22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Wu J, Xu ZH, Li LP (2017) Unascertained measure model of water and mud inrush risk evaluation in karst tunnels and its engineering application. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(4):1170–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Qu XB, Wang XC, Yuanita V, Wong SC (2011) Quantitative risk assessment modeling for nonhomogeneous urban road tunnels. Risk Anal 31(3):382–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezakhani P, Jang WS, Lee S, Lee DE (2014) Project risk assessment model combining the fuzzy weighted average principle with a similarity measure. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(2):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin HS, Kwon YC, Jung YS, Bae GJ, Kim YG (2009) Methodology for quantitative hazard assessment for tunnel collapses based on case histories in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(6):1072–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubs P, Hobbs BE, Zhao BC (2016) Acquisition of spatially-distributed geochemical data in geoinformatics: Computational simulation approach. J Geochem Explor 164:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Xu H, Pang W (2008) GIS and ANN coupling model: An innovative approach to evaluate vulnerability of karst water inrush in coalmines of north China. Environ Geol 54(5):937–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HL, Li N, Wang H (2010) Risk assessment and control measures of collapse for tunnel construction. J Traffic Transportation Eng (Xi'an, Shaanxi) 10(4):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yang W, Li M, Liu X (2012) Risk assessment of floor water inrush in coal mines based on secondary fuzzy comprehensive assessment. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Jing H, Yu L, Su H, Luo N (2017) Set pair analysis for risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76(3):1199–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu CH, Ren QW (2004) Fuzzy-synthetical evaluation on stability of surrounding rockmasses of underground engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(11):1852–1855

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZH, Li SC, Li LP, Hou JG, Sui B, Shi SS (2011a) Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process. Rock Soil Mech 32(6):1757–1766

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZH, Li SC, Li LP, Chen J, Shi SS (2011b) Construction permit mechanism of karst tunnels based on dynamic assessment and management of risk. Chinese J Geotech Eng 33(11):1715–1725

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZD (2003) Discussion and study on large deformation of tunnel in squeezing ground. Mod Tunnelling Technol 2:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Hornby P, Ord A, Peng SL, Liu LM (2008a) Theoretical and numerical analyses of chemical-dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(9):1107–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A, Hornby P, Peng SL (2008b) Effect of reactive surface areas associated with different particle shapes on chemical-dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks. Transp Porous Media 73(1):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2008c) Convective and advective heat transfer in geological systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB (2009) Dynamic and transient infinite elements: Theory and geophysical, geotechnical and geoenvironmental applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2009) Fundamentals of computational geoscience: Numerical methods and algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M (2010) Karst fault tunnel construction technology of Yichang-Wanzhou railway. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2010a) Theoretical analyses of nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution-induced instability in two-dimensional fluid-saturated porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34(17):1767–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2010b) Theoretical analyses of the effects of solute dispersion on chemical-dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous media. Transp Porous Media 84(3):629–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A, Peng SL (2010c) Effects of mineral dissolution ratios on chemical-dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous media. Transp Porous Media 82(2):317–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Reid LB, Regenauer-Lieb K, Poulet T (2012a) A porosity-gradient replacement approach for computational simulation of chemical-dissolution front propagation in fluid-saturated porous media including pore-fluid compressibility. Comput Geosci 16(3):735–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2012b) Effects of medium and pore-fluid compressibility on chemical-dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36:1077–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou ZQ, Li SC, Li LP, Shi SS, Song SG, Wang K (2013) Attribute recognition model of fatalness assessment of water and mud inrush in karst tunnels and its application. Rock Soil Mech 34(3):818–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2013) Theoretical analyses of acidization dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated carbonate rocks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37(13):2084–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB (2014) Physical and chemical dissolution front instability in porous media: Theoretical analyses and computational simulations. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB (2015) Advances in numerical algorithms and methods in computational geosciences with modeling characteristics of multiple physical and chemical processes. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 58(5):783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2015a) Theoretical analyses of chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated porous media under non-isothermal conditions. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39(8):799–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2015b) Computational simulation of chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated porous media under non-isothermal conditions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(2):135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Poulet T, Regenauer-Lieb K (2015c) Numerical modeling of toxic nonaqueous phase liquid removal from contaminated groundwater systems: Mesh effect and discretization error estimation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39(6):571–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Schaubs P, Hobbs BE (2016a) Computational simulation of seepage instability problems in fluid-saturated porous rocks: Potential dynamic mechanisms for controlling mineralisation patterns. Ore Geol Rev 79:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2016b) Chemical dissolution-front instability associated with water-rock reactions in groundwater hydrology: Analyses of porosity-permeability relationship effects. J Hydrol 540:1078–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CB, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2017) A new alternative approach for investigating acidization dissolution front propagation in fluid-saturated carbonate rocks. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 60(8):1197–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51379113), National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No.: 2016YFC0600803), and Qilu Engineering Construction Projects of Science and Technology in 2016 (Grant No.: 2016QL02070001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Ji’nan, Shandong, 250061, China

    S. C. Li & J. Wu

Authors
  1. S. C. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S.C., Wu, J. A multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method of karst tunnels and its engineering application. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1761–1776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1214-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1214-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation