Skip to main content
Log in

Geotechnical study of marble, schist, and granite as dimension stone: a case study from parts of Lesser Himalaya, Neelum Valley Area, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extensive production of concrete and bricks has reduced the use of stone masonry in construction. The overwhelming use of artificial material, especially concrete, has led to many environmental issues. Use of dimension stone is almost non-existent in general construction. Nonetheless, it is still widely adopted in foundations, facings, dams, coastal defenses, and retaining and water containment structures. For the possible rational replacement of artificial materials, marble, schist, and granite were selected for evaluation as dimension stones. Important properties influencing the behaviour of construction material, such as compressive strength, tensile strength, durability, water absorption, and petrography, were investigated on selected rocks. The results were correlated with standard specifications of ASTM, ISO 14689-1 (Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of rock. Part 1: Identification and description 1–16, 2003) and Gamble durability index (1971). Regional faults, Main Boundary Thrust, and Panjal Thrust, present in the area influence the characteristics of rocks adversely. Granite has a lower compressive strength than the ASTM specification so it should be avoided for load-bearing masonry units and external pavements. Granites and marbles have a higher degree of water absorption. All three rock units have a very high degree of polish, so their use as decorative stone, especially as internal flooring and at internal walls, is highly recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell FG (2007) Geological materials used in construction. Engineering Geology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 278–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1975) The point load test in Geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossart P, Dietrich D, Greco A, Ottiger R, Ramsay JG (1984) A new structural interpretation of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis, southern Himalayas, Pakistan. Kashmir J Geol 2(1):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins JA, Matin ASA (2004) Geological map. Azad Kashmir (1962–64) Re-interpreted by Ahmed Hussain, Naseer Mughal, Ihteshamul Haq and Abdul Latif: Geological Survey of Pakistan

  • Gamble JC (1971) Durability-Plasticity classification of shales and other argillaceous rocks. Dissertation, University of Illinois

  • International Standard Organization (2003) 14689-1 (E) Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of rock. Part 1: Identification and description. International organization for standardization, Geneva, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Khan MS (1989) Engineering characteristics of Nauseri Marble, Azad Kashmir. Kashmir J Geol 6 and 7: 125–132

  • Khan MA, Khan NA, Sheikh SA, Nasim S (1995) Geotechnical properties of Neelum granites, Neelum Valley, Azad Kashmir. Environ Eng Geosci 1(3):376–380 (Fall 1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C (2009) The greening of the concrete industry. Cem Concr Compos 31:601–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price DG (2009) Investigating the ground. Engineering Geology Principles and Practices (Edited and compiled by M.H de Freitas), pp 22–23

  • Quick GW (2002) CSIRO Building. Selective guide to the selection of dimension stone, Construction and Engineering, Highett, Victoria, Australia 3190: 01–03

  • Shah SMI (2009) Stratigraphy of Pakistan. GSP memoirs, Vol 22. Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Pakistan

  • Sims I (1991) Quality and durability of stone for construction. Q J Eng Geol 24:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MR (ed) (1999) Stone: building stone, rock fill and armour stone in construction. Engineering Geology Special Publication No. 16, The Geological Society, London

  • Wadia DN (1934) The Cambrian-Trias sequence of Northwest Kashmir. Geol Surv India Rec 68 2:121–176

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohail Mustafa.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Table 4 Compressive strength test results
Table 5 Classification of rock material based on unconfined compressive strength (ISO 14689-1 2003)
Table 6 Tensile strength test results from the rocks under study
Table 7 Specific gravity and water absorption results
Table 8 Slake durability test results
Table 9 Point load test results
Table 10 Slake durability classification (Gamble 1971). Also shows range of samples tested

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mustafa, S., Khan, M.A., Khan, M.R. et al. Geotechnical study of marble, schist, and granite as dimension stone: a case study from parts of Lesser Himalaya, Neelum Valley Area, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74, 1475–1487 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0719-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0719-8

Keywords

Navigation