Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rock failure modes under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock failure is a serious problem in rock engineering environments. Rock failure modes, however, are complex and difficult to quantify or predict. A comprehensive study on rock failure modes at laboratory scale is, therefore, potentially important as it helps recognize the adequacy of the support designed on the basis of the nature of an engineering work. With due need, this paper analyzes the failure modes of granite, schist, and sandstone under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests in relation to corresponding strengths. The nature of the principal failure mode changes from axial splitting to shearing along a single plane to multiple fracturing in the case of both granite and sandstone specimens as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) increases. In the case of schist, specimens failed at low UCS show failure along foliations whereas specimens which do not fail along foliations portray high strength. The relation between failure modes of all three rocks under uniaxial compression and corresponding UCS values was broadly explained in terms of damage evolution of the rocks. Granite and sandstone specimens failed mainly following central or central multiple type of fracturing whereas schist specimens principally failed by layer activation in combination with either central or non-central fractures over the entire range of determined Brazilian tensile strength. In the case of granite and sandstone, central multiple failure mode corresponds to high tensile strength. Descriptions of different failure modes under point loading were presented. It was found that granite and sandstone specimens generally fail through the rock materials in one or more extensional planes containing the line of loading. Failure patterns showing triple junctions correspond to high point load strength indices. In the case of schist, specimens failed along foliations show a low point load strength index whereas specimens failed through material with a single extensional plane result in high strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akesson U, Hansson J, Stigh J (2004) Characterization of microcracks in the Bohus granite, western Sweden, caused by uniaxial cyclic loading. Eng Geol 72:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amann F, Button EA, Evans KF, Gischig VS, Blumel M (2011) Experimental study of the brittle behavior of clay shale in short term unconfined compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geological Society Engineering Group Working Party (1995) The description and classification of weathered for engineering purposes. Q J Eng Geo 28:207–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2001) American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standards on Disc, 04.08. West Conshohocken, PA

  • Aydin A, Basu A (2006) The use of Brazilian test as a quantitative measure of rock weathering. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A (2006) Mechanical characterization of granitic rocks of Hong Kong by improved index testing procedures with reference to weathering induced microstructural changes. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong

  • Basu A, Aydin A (2006) Predicting uniaxial compressive strength by point load test: significance of cone penetration. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Kamran M (2010) Point load test on schistose rocks and its applicability in predicting uniaxial compressive strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:823–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA (2009) Evaluation of rock mechanical behaviours under uniaxial compression for different weathering grades. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1967) Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock: part I—theory of the fracture process. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 4:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1984) Rock mechanics design in mining and tunneling. AA Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:863–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace WF, Paulding BW, Scholz CH (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 71:3939–3953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook N (1985) The equivalent core diameter method of size and shape correction in point loads testing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill JS, Shakoor A (1990) Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27:495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Wong RHC (1996) Uniaxial compressive strength and point load strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E, Stead D, Stimpson B, Read RS (1998) Identifying crack initiation and propagation thresholds in brittle rock. Ca Geotech J 35:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh DK, Srivastava M (1991) Point-load strength: an index for classification of rock material. Bull Eng Geol Env 44:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA (1989) Rock Mechanics principles in engineering practice. CIRIA Report, Butterworths, London

  • Hudyma N, Avar BB, Karakouzian M (2004) Compressive strength and failure modes of lithophysae-rich Topopah Spring Tuff specimens and analog models containing cavities. Eng Geol 73:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison CS (1974) Laboratory handbook of petrographic techniques. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission of testing methods, ISRM, compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish national group, Kozan Ofset, Ankara

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW (1979) Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumikis AR (1983) Rock mechanics, 2nd edn. Trans Tech Publ, Clausthal

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E, Baud P, Reuschle T, Wong TF (2001) Mechanical behavior and failure mode of Bensteim sandstone under triaxial compression. Phys Chem Earth (A) 26:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajtai EZ, Lajtai VN (1974) The evolution of brittle fracture in rocks. J Geol Soc Lond 130:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Lee PKK, Tsui Y, Tham LG, Tang CA (2003) Failure process of granite. Int J Geomeh 3:84–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahur AK, Kumar R, Sonkawade RG, Sengupta D, Prasad R (2008) Measurement of natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate from rock samples of Jaduguda uranium mines and its radiological implications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 266:1591–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji VB (2011) Understanding failure mode in uniaxial and triaxial compression for a hard brittle rock. In: Proceedings of the 12th ISRM international congress on rock mechanics. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, pp 723–726

  • Martin CD (1993) The strength of massive Lac du granite around underground openings. PhD thesis, University of Manitoba

  • Martin CD, Chandler NA (1994) The progressive fracture of Lac du Bonnet granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31:643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi MK, Bream BR, Misra KC, Naik RK (2004) Age of granitic activity associated with copper–molybdenum mineralization at Malanjkhand, Central India. Miner Deposita 39:670–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Johnson AM (1972) Crack growth and faulting in cylindrical specimen of chemsford granite. Int Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9:37–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco C, Guinea GV, Planas J, Elices M (1999) Mechanisms of rupture in splitting tests. ACI Mater J 96:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK (1994) Crustal evolution of Singhbhum North Orissa, Eastern India. Geol Soc India Memoir 27:281–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis CG, Ashby MF (1986) The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress state. Acta Metall 30:511–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli FJ, Brown ET (1989) Failure of three sedimentary rocks in triaxial and hollow cylinder compression tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 26:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz C (1968) Experimental study of the fracturing process in brittle rock. J Geophys Res 73:1447–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S (2003) Gondwana sedimentation in the Pranhita–Godavari valley: a review. J Asian Earth Sci 21:633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szwedzicki TA (2007) A hypothesis on modes of failure of rock samples tested in uniaxial compression. Technical note. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2010) Effect of layer orientation on the failure of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugrul A, Zarif IH (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Eng Geol 51:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vutukuri VS, Lama RD, Saluja SS (1974) Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks. Trans Tech Publ, Clausthal

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to Prof. Ulusay and an anonymous reviewer for their comprehensive review of the manuscript that helped enhance the quality and clarity of this paper. The financial support (Project Number SR/FTP/ES-03/2008) by the Department of Science and Technology (DST, New Delhi, India) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank the Malanjkhand Copper Project, Uranium Corporation of India Limited, and Singareni Colliery Company Limited for providing granite, schist, and sandstone cores, respectively, for academic purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    A. Basu, D. A. Mishra & K. Roychowdhury

Authors
  1. A. Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. A. Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Roychowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Basu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basu, A., Mishra, D.A. & Roychowdhury, K. Rock failure modes under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72, 457–475 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0505-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0505-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation