Skip to main content
Log in

Core size and time effects on water absorption values of rock and cement mortar samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no standard size for samples used to establish water absorption (WA) by weight and volume. A total of 150 samples with five different diameters (54, 48, 42, 30 and 21 mm) were cored from sandstone, limestone and cement mortar with a length:diameter ratio between 2.0 and 2.5. The laboratory experiments were continued for 90 days, although some samples reached their maximum absorption at 43 and 60 days. The study has shown that WA values vary significantly with sample dimension and time. NX (54 mm) cores had the lowest WA values while 21 and 30 mm diameter cores gave the highest WA values. The difference between 24-h and 90-day WA values was greatest for the 21 mm cores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assefa S, McCann C, Sothcott J (2003) Velocity of compressional and shear waves in limestones. Geophys Prospect 51:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1994) D2938–86 Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact core specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 4.08 soil and rock. ASTM Publications, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C-97 (1996) Standard test methods for absorption and bulk specific gravity of dimension stone. Annual Book of ASTM Standards

  • Cobanoglu İ (2005) The geotechnical evaluation of Adana and near around for static and seismic conditions with geographical information system. PhD thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, p 370 (in Turkish with English abstract)

  • Hawkins AB (1998) Aspects of rock strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Inst. Min. Metal., London

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mec Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1981) Suggested methods: rock characterization, testing and monitoring. Oxford Pergamon Press, p 211

  • Japsen P, Rasmussen KB, Fabricius IL, Mavko G, Pedersen JM (2002) Effect of fluid substitution on ultrasonic velocities in chalk plugs. South Arne Field. North Sea. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Int. Exposition and 72th annual meeting technical program, expanded abstract, vol 72, pp 1881–1884

  • Koncagül EC, Santi PM (1999) Predicting the unconfined compressive strength of the Breathitt shale using slake durability, shore hardness and rock structural properties. Int J Rock Mec Min Sci 36:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafavich F, Kendall CH, Tood TP (1984) The relationship between acoustic properties and the petrographic character of carbonate rocks. Geophysics 49:1622–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RILEM (1980) Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Commission 25-PEM. Mater Struct 13:175–253

    Google Scholar 

  • TS 699 (1987) Testing methods of natural building stones. Publication of Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2004) Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İbrahim Çobanoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çobanoğlu, İ., Çelik, S.B., Dinçer, İ. et al. Core size and time effects on water absorption values of rock and cement mortar samples. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68, 483–489 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0215-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0215-0

Keywords

Navigation