Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) has been widely used to simulate various real-like environments suitable to explore and interact, similar to being genuinely there (i.e., allowing presence). User experience in virtual environments (VE) is highly subjective, and presence-based self-reports have addressed its assessment; however, it is unclear how a diverse set of VR features relates to the subscales of the questionnaires (e.g., engagement, immersion, or Attention), which could be helpful to create and improve immersive VE. Consequently, most current studies have appealed to self-defined criteria to design their VE in response to a lack of accepted methodological frameworks. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the current publications to identify critical design elements to promote presence and realistic experiences in VR-games users. We extracted information from different databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ACM, IEEE, Springer, and Scholar) and used inclusion and exclusion criteria to reduce the original set of 595 candidates to 53 final papers. The findings showed that better quality and quantity in resources allocation (software and hardware) and more accuracy in objects and characters, which all refer to higher immersion, provide Place Illusion (PI), i.e., the spatial dimension of presence. Furthermore, Scenario’s Realism, external stimuli, and coherent match between virtual and real worlds (including body representation) are decisive to set Plausibility Illusion (PSI), i.e., the dimension associated with coherence. Finally, performance feedback, character customization, and multiplayer mechanics are crucial to assure motivation and agency, which are user-exclusive but crucial to defining presence’s perception. Moreover, about 65% of the analyzed studies agreed that immersive media and social interaction could simultaneously influence PI and PSI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alexander AL, Brunyé T, Sidman J, Weil SA (2005) From gaming to training: a review of studies on fidelity, immersion, presence, and buy-in and their effects on transfer in pc-based simulations and games. DARWARS Train Impact Group 5:1–14
Baranes AF, Oudeyer PY, Gottlieb J (2014) The effects of task difficulty, novelty and the size of the search space on intrinsically motivated exploration. Front Neurosci 8:317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00317
Biocca F, Harms C, Gregg J (2001) The networked minds measure of social presence: pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In: 4th annual international workshop on presence, Philadelphia, USA, pp 1–9
Birk MV, Atkins C, Bowey JT, Mandryk RL (2016) Fostering intrinsic motivation through Avatar identification in digital games. In: 2016 CHI conference, p 2982-2995. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858062
Brooks FP (1999) What’s real about virtual reality?. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 19(6):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.799723
Çakirouglu Ü, Gökouglu S (2019) A design model for using virtual reality in behavioral skills training. J Educ Comput Res 57(7):1723–1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854030
Caldas OI, Aviles OF, Rodriguez-Guerrero C (2020) Effects of presence and challenge variations on emotional engagement in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 28(5):1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2985308
Chiao HM, Chen YL, Huang WH (2018) Examining the usability of an online virtual tour-guiding platform for cultural tourism education. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ 23(February):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.05.002
Chittaro L, Sioni R (2015) Serious games for emergency preparedness: evaluation of an interactive vs. a non-interactive simulation of a terror attack. Comput Human Behav 50:508–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.074
Choudhary Z, Kim K, Schubert R, Bruder G, Welch GF (2020) Virtual big heads: analysis of human perception and comfort of head scales in social virtual reality. In: 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), pp 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00063
Collins J, Regenbrecht H, Langlotz T (2017) Visual coherence in mixed reality: a systematic enquiry. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 26(1):16–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00284
Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row Publishers, New York
Csikszentmihalyi M (1998) Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. Basic books, New York
Cummings JJ, Bailenson JN (2015) How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol 19(2):272–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
Cuthbert R, Turkay S, Brown R (2019) The effects of customisation on player experiences and motivation in a virtual reality game. In: ACM international conference proceeding series, pp 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369475
Dawson P, Goodwill AM (2013) A review of weapon choice in violent and sexual crime. Beijing Law Rev 04(01):20–27. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2013.41003
De Leo G, Diggs LA, Radici E, Mastaglio TW (2014) Measuring sense of presence and user characteristics to predict effective training in an online simulated virtual environment. Simul Healthc 9(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a99dd9
Deci EL, Vansteenkiste M (2004) Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: understanding human development in positive psychology. Ric Psicol 27(1):23–40
Eckstein B, Krapp E, Elsässer A, Lugrin B (2019) Smart substitutional reality: integrating the smart home into virtual reality. Entertain Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100306
Ferdani D, Fanini B, Piccioli MC, Carboni F, Vigliarolo P (2020) 3D reconstruction and validation of historical background for immersive VR applications and games: the case study of the Forum of Augustus in Rome. J Cult Herit 43:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.12.004
Fox J, McKnight J, Sun Y, Maung D, Crawfis R (2020) Using a serious game to communicate risk and minimize psychological distance regarding environmental pollution. Telemat Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101320
Fröhner J, Salvietti G, Beckerle P, Prattichizzo D (2018) Can wearable haptic devices foster the embodiment of virtual limbs? IEEE Trans Haptics 12(3):339–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2889497
Gallagher S (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
Gilbert SB (2016) Perceived realism of virtual environments depends on authenticity. Presence 25(4):322–1324. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00276
Gilpin HR, Lorimer Moseley G, Stanton TR, Newport R (2014) Evidence for distorted mental representation of the hand in osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 54(4):678–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu367
Gorini A, Capideville CS, De Leo G, Mantovani F, Riva G (2011) The role of immersion and narrative in mediated presence: the virtual hospital experience. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw 14(3):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0100
Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Novak D (2017) Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person: effects on motivation and exercise intensity. J Neuroeng Rehabil 14(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0231-4
Grassini S, Laumann K, Skogstad MR (2020) The use of virtual reality alone does not promote training performance (but sense of presence does). Front Psychol 11:1743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743
Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M (2007) Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Topics Stroke Rehabil 14(2):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1402-52
Hofer M, Hartmann T, Eden A, Ratan R, Hahn L (2020) The role of plausibility in the experience of spatial presence in virtual environments. Front Virtual Reality 1:2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00002
Hooi R, Cho H (2017) Virtual world continuance intention. Telemat Inform 34(8):1454–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.009
Kim K, Rosenthal MZ, Zielinski DJ, Brady R (2014) Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 113(3):882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.12.024
Kim K, Schubert R, Hochreiter J, Bruder G, Welch G (2019) Blowing in the wind: increasing social presence with a virtual human via environmental airflow interaction in mixed reality. Comput Graph (Pergamon) 83:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2019.06.006
Kim K, de Melo CM, Norouzi N, Bruder G, Welch GF (2020) Reducing task load with an embodied intelligent virtual assistant for improved performance in collaborative decision making. In: 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), IEEE, pp 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00-30
Knaepen K, Marusic U, Crea S, Guerrero CDR, Vitiello N, Pattyn N, Mairesse O, Lefeber D, Meeusen R (2015) Psychophysiological response to cognitive workload during symmetrical, asymmetrical and dual-task walking. Human Mov Sci 40:248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.001
van der Kuil MN, Visser-Meily JM, Evers AW, van der Ham IJ (2018) A usability study of a serious game in cognitive rehabilitation: a compensatory navigation training in acquired brain injury patients. Front Psychol 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00846
Li CY, Fang YH (2020) I searched, I collected, I experienced: exploring how mobile augmented reality makes the players go. J Retail Consum Serv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102018
Ma Z (2019) Effects of immersive stories on prosocial attitudes and willingness to help: testing psychological mechanisms. Media Psychol 23(6):865–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1651655
Madier K, Kulkarni R, Nebeling M (2019) Enabling low-cost co-located virtual reality experiences. Master’s thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Maffei L, Masullo M, Pascale A, Ruggiero G, Romero VP (2016) Immersive virtual reality in community planning: acoustic and visual congruence of simulated vs real world. Sustain Cities Soc 27:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.022
Makransky G, Petersen GB (2019) Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: a structural equation modeling approach. Comput Educ 134(July):15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002
Maneuvrier A, Decker L, Ceyte H, Fleury P, Renaud P (2020) Presence promotes performance on a virtual spatial cognition task: impact of human factors on virtual reality assessment. Front Virtual Real 1:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.571713
Manivannan S, Al-Amri M, Postans M, Westacott LJ, Gray W, Zaben M (2019) The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions for improvement of neurocognitive performance after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 34(2):E52–E65. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000412
Martini M, Perez-Marcos D, Sanchez-Vives MV (2013) What colour is my arm? Changes in skin colour of an embodied virtual arm modulates pain threshold. Front Human Neurosci 7(438):1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00438
Nierula B, Martini M, Matamala-Gomez M, Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2017) Seeing an embodied virtual hand is analgesic contingent on colocation. J Pain 18(6):645–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.01.003
Novak D, Nagle A, Keller U, Riener R (2014) Increasing motivation in robot-aided arm rehabilitation with competitive and cooperative gameplay. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-64
Pals R, Steg L, Dontje J, Siero FW, van der Zee KI (2014) Physical features, coherence and positive outcomes of person-environment interactions: a virtual reality study. J Environ Psychol 40:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.004
Peng W, Hsieh G (2012) The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Comput Human Behav 28(6):2100–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.014
Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Fromm J, Wohlgenannt I (2020) A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Ramírez-Fernández C, Morán AL, García-Canseco E (2015) Haptic feedback in motor hand virtual therapy increases precision and generates less mental workload. In: 2015 9th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth), IEEE, pp 280–286. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.260242
Rodriguez-Guerrero C, Knaepen K, Fraile-Marinero JC, Perez-Turiel J, Gonzalez-de Garibay V, Lefeber D (2017) Improving challenge/skill ratio in a multimodal interface by simultaneously adapting game difficulty and haptic assistance through psychophysiological and performance feedback. Front Neurosci 11:242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00242
Rose T, Nam CS, Chen KB (2018) Immersion of virtual reality for rehabilitation-review. Appl Ergon 69:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.01.009
Sagnier C, Loup-Escande E, Lourdeaux D, Thouvenin I, Valléry G (2020) User acceptance of virtual reality: an extended technology acceptance model. Int J Human Comput Interact. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
Sailer M, Hense JU, Mayr SK, Mandl H (2017) How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput Human Behav 69:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Sanchez-Vives MV, Spanlang B, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Slater M (2010) Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010381
Simeone AL (2015) Substitutional reality: towards a research agenda. In: 2015 IEEE 1st workshop on everyday virtual reality, WEVR 2015, IEEE, pp 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEVR.2015.7151690
Skarbez R, Brooks FP, Whitton MC (2017) A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput Surv. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301
Skarbez R, Neyret S, Brooks FP, Slater M, Whitton MC (2017) A psychophysical experiment regarding components of the plausibility illusion. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 23(4):1369–1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657158
Skarbez R, Brooks Jr FP, Whitton MC (2018) Immersion and coherence in a stressful virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505.3281530
Skarbez R, Brooks F, Whitton M (2020) Immersion and coherence: research agenda and early results. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2983701
Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3):1–5
Slater M (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364(1535):3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
Slater M, Steed A (2000) A virtual presence counter. Presence 9(5):413–434. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566925
Slater M, Spanlang B, Sanchez-Vives MV, Blanke O (2010) First Person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010564
Staddon JE, Cerutti DT (2003) Operant conditioning. Annual Rev Psychol 54(1):115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145124
Stanton TR, Gilpin HR, Edwards L, Moseley GL, Newport R (2018) Illusory resizing of the painful knee is analgesic in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5206
Swanson LR, Whittinghill DM (2015) Intrinsic or extrinsic? using videogames to motivate stroke survivors: a systematic review. Games Health J 4(3):253–258. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0074
Taub M, Sawyer R, Smith A, Rowe J, Azevedo R, Lester J (2020) The agency effect: the impact of student agency on learning, emotions, and problem-solving behaviors in a game-based learning environment. Comput Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103781
Turkay S, Adinolf S (2015) The effects of customization on motivation in an extended study with a massively multiplayer online roleplaying game. Cyberpsychology. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-3-2
van’t Riet J, Meeuwes AC, van der Voorden L, Jansz J, (2018) Investigating the effects of a persuasive digital game on immersion, identification, and willingness to help. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 40(4):180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1459301
Vargas JCG, Fabregat R, Carrillo-Ramos A, Jové T (2020) Survey: using augmented reality to improve learning motivation in cultural heritage studies. Appl Sci (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030897
Vorderer P, Hartmann T, Klimmt C (2003) Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on entertainment computing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 8–10 May, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/958720.958735
Werbach K, Hunter D (2012) For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton School Press, San Francisco
Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 7(3):225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
Wu DY, Lin JHT (2018) Ways of seeing matter: the impact of a naturally mapped perceptual system on the persuasive effects of immersive virtual reality advertising. Commun Res Rep 35(5):434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1525349
Yildirim C, Bostan B, Berkman MI (2019) Impact of different immersive techniques on the perceived sense of presence measured via subjective scales. Entertain Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100308
Yu R (2019) Designing coherent interactions for Vvirtual reality. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Zibrek K, Kokkinara E, McDonnell R (2018) The effect of realistic appearance of virtual characters in immersive environments-does the character’s personality play a role? IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 24(4):1681–1690. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794638
Zibrek K, Martin S, McDonnell R (2019) Is photorealism important for perception of expressive virtual humans in virtual reality? ACM Trans Appl Percept. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349609
Funding
This work was financially supported by Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones in Universidad Militar Nueva Granada (UMNG) under Grant ING-IMP-3124 (2020-2021). Oscar I. Caldas received research support from both UMNG and VUB as a part of a Joint PhD Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The literature search, data analysis and first draft of the manuscript were performed by Oscar I. Caldas and Natalia Sanchez. All authors drafted and/or critically revised the following versions and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caldas, O.I., Sanchez, N., Mauledoux, M. et al. Leading presence-based strategies to manipulate user experience in virtual reality environments. Virtual Reality 26, 1507–1518 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00645-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00645-3