Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The affect of contact force sensations on user performance in virtual assembly tasks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a realistic virtual assembly environment is challenging because of the complexity of the physical processes and the limitation of available VR technology. Many research activities in this domain primarily focused on particular aspects of the assembly task such as the feasibility of assembly operations in terms of interference between the manipulated parts. The virtual assembly environment reported in this research is focused on mechanical part assembly. The approach presented addresses the problem of part-to-part contacts during the mating phase of assembly tasks. The system described calculates contact force sensations by making their intensity dependent on the depth of penetration. However the penetration is not visible to the user who sees a separate model, which does not intersect the mating part model. The two 3D models of the part, the off-screen rendered model and the on-screen rendered model are connected by a spring-dumper arrangement. The force calculated is felt by the operator through the haptic interface when parts come in contact during the mating phase of the assembly task. An evaluation study investigating the effect of contact force sensation on user performance during part-to-part interface was conducted. The results showed statistically significant effect of contact force sensation on user performance in terms of task completion time. The subjective evaluation based on feedback from users confirmed that contact force sensation is a useful cue for the operator to find the relative positions of components in the final assembly state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe N, Zhang JY, Tanaka K, Taki H (1996) A training system using virtual machines for teaching assembling/disassembling operations to novices. Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 3:2096–2101

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams RJ, Hannaford B (1998) A two-port framework for the design of unconditionally stable haptic interfaces. In: Proceedings IROS, Anaheim, CA

  • Baggett P, Ehrenfeucht A (1988) Conceptualising in assembly tasks. Human Factor 30(3):269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggett P, Ehrenfeucht A (1991) Building physical and mental models in assembly tasks. Int J Industr Ergon 7(3):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borst CW, Indugula P (2005) Realistic virtual grasping. In: Proceedings IEEE virtual reality conference (VR’05). Bonn, Germany, pp 91–98, 320

  • Borst CW, Indugula AP (2006) A spring model for whole-hand virtual grasping. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 15(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel R, Ullrich C, Silver J (2001) VirtualHand v2.5 programmer’s guide. Technical Report, Virtual Technologies

  • Carpenter ID, Dewar RG, Ritchie JM, Simmons JEL (1996) Enhancing a virtual environment for manual assembly. In: Proceedings 12th international conference on CAD/CAM robotics and factories of the future, Middlesex University, UK, pp 1067–1072

  • Chryssolouris G, Mavrikios D, Fragos D, Karabatsou V (2000) A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human-related factors in assembly processes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 16(4):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgate JE, Grafing PE, Stanley MC, Schenkel G (1993) Implementation of stiff virtual walls in force-reflecting interfaces. In: Proceedings IEEE virtual reality annual international symposium (VRAIS), Seattle, WA, pp 202–208

  • Homen De Mello LS, Lee S (1991) Computer-aided mechanical assembly planning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 217–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Delchambre A (1992) Computer aided assembly planning. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar RG, Carpenter ID, Ritchie JM, Simmons JEL (1997) Assembly planning in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings PICMET’97, Portland, USA, pp 664–667

  • Dewar RG (1998) Assembly plans from virtual environments. PhD Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Exp Psychol 47:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbaya S, Coiffet Ph, Blazevic P (2003) Experiments of assembly planning in virtual environment. In: Proceedings 5th IEEE international symposium on assembly and task planning (ISATP ‘03), France

  • Garbaya S, Coiffet Ph, Blazevic P (2001) Integrating computerised assembly planning with virtual assembly environment. In: Proceedings virtual reality in mechanical and production engineering (VR-Mech’01). Brussels, Belgium

  • Hu HH, Gooch AA, Creem-regehr SH, Tompson WB (2002) Visual cues for perceiving distances from objects to surfaces. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 11:652–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Sheridan T, Whitney D (1997a) Experiments using multimodal virtual environments in design for assembly analysis. Presence 6(3):318–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Whitney D, Zeltzer D (1997b) Prototyping and design for assembly analysis using multimodal virtual environments. Comput-Aid Des 29(8):585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarayam S, Connacher H, Lyons K (1997) Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. Comput-Aid Des 29(8):575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkevis E, Metaxas D, Badler NI (1996) User-controlled physics-based animation for articulated figures. In: Proceedings Computer Animation, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 16–26

  • Koutek M, Post FH (2001) Spring-based manipulation tools for virtual environments. In: Proceedings immersive projection technology and virtual environments. Springer, Stuttgart, pp 61–70

  • McNeely W, Puterbaugh D, James J (1999) Six degrees-of-freedom haptic rendering using Voxel sampling. In: Proceedings SIGGRAPH 99, ISBN 020148-560-5, LA, CA, USA, pp 401–408

  • Nevins JL, Whitney DE (1980) Assembly research. Automatic 16:595–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westenhofer W, Hahn J (1996) Using kinematic clones to control the dynamic simulation of articulated figures. In: Proceedings Computer Graphics International, Pohang, Korea, pp 26–37

  • Wilson J R (1998) Virtual environments and ergonomics: needs and opportunities. Ergonomics 40(10):1057–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachmann G, Rettig A (2001) Natural and robust interaction in virtual assembly simulation. In: Proceedings 8th ISPE international conference on concurrent engineering: research and applications. Anaheim, CA

  • Zorriassatine F, Wykes R, Parkin R, Gindy N (2003) A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development. In: Proceedings Inst. Mech. Engineers. Part B: J Eng Manuf 217(4):513–530

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Robotics Laboratory of Versailles, The University of Versailles, 10-12 Avenue de l’Europe, 78140, Velizy, France

    Samir Garbaya & U. Zaldivar-Colado

Authors
  1. Samir Garbaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Zaldivar-Colado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Garbaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garbaya, S., Zaldivar-Colado, U. The affect of contact force sensations on user performance in virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Reality 11, 287–299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-007-0075-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-007-0075-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation