Skip to main content
Log in

Herzinfarktnetzwerk Region Augsburg (HERA)

Einjahresergebnisse

Network myocardial infarction Augsburg (HERA)

First year results

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das Register des Herzinfarktnetzwerks Region Augsburg (HERA) untersucht prognostisch relevante Therapiezeitintervalle nach (über)regionaler Netzwerketablierung zur Akutintervention bei ST-Strecken-Hebungsinfarkt (STEMI) an einem Maximalversorgungshaus in gemischt städtisch-ländlicher Struktur.

Material und Methoden

Es wurden 250 konsekutive STEMI-Patienten vom 1.5.2007 bis 15.5.2008 eingeschlossen. Prognostisch relevante Therapiezeitintervalle sowie das Vorhandensein eines 12-Kanal-Elektrokardiogramms (EKG) und die Medikation am Einsatzort wurden von Not- bzw. Klinikärzten standardisiert dokumentiert.

Ergebnisse

Die „pain-to-contact time“ betrug im Median 71 min, die „contact-to-door time“ (C2DT) 56 min, die „door-to-balloon time“ (D2BT) 65 min und die „contact-to-balloon time“ 121 min. Insgesamt 80% der Patienten mit primärer Notarztversorgung hatten eine D2BT von <90 min. Bei 82% der Patienten wurde vom Notarzt ein 12-Kanal-EKG angefertigt. Eine Reduktion der D2BT wurde durch direkte Übergabe im Herzkatheterlabor erreicht.

Schlussfolgerungen

C2BT und D2BT sind niedriger als in den meisten publizierten Studien und Registern und kommen den Vorgaben der Leitlinien nahe. Die Vorgabe des/der American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) einer D2BT von <90 min bei >75% aller Patienten wird bereits erfüllt. Eine weitere Reduktion der D2BT wäre möglich, insbesondere durch direkte Patientenübergabe durch den Notarzt im Herzkatheterlabor. Dies setzt jedoch die verlässliche STEMI-Diagnose am Einsatzort mittels 12-Kanal-EKG voraus.

Abstract

Background

The registry of the Network Myocardial Infarction Augsburg (HERA) investigates prognosis relevant therapy time intervals after implementation of a (supra) regional network for primary percutaneous catheter intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a maximum care hospital in a mixed urban and rural area.

Material and methods

A total of 250 consecutive patients with STEMI were enrolled from 1st May 2007 until 15th May 2008. Prognosis relevant therapy time intervals, presence of a 12-lead ECG and medication on site were documented in a standardized manner.

Results

Median pain-to-contact time (P2CT) was 71 min, contact-to-door time (C2DT) 56 min, door-to-balloon time (D2BT) 65 min and contact-to-balloon time (C2BT) 121 min. Of the patients admitted via ambulance transfer 80% showed a D2BT of <90 min and on site 12-lead ECG was performed in 82%. Significant reduction of D2BT was possible by direct emergency transfer to the catheterization laboratory (cath lab).

Conclusions

C2BT and D2BT compared favorably with published data from studies and registries and nearly fulfilled guideline requirements. American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) targets of a D2BT <90 min in >75% of patients have already been achieved. Further reduction of D2BT would be possible especially by direct ambulance transfer to the catheterization laboratory. A precondition for this is reliable STEMI diagnosis with recording of a 12-lead ECG on site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Abbreviations

ACC:

American College of Cardiology

AHA:

American Heart Association

C2BT:

„Contact-to-balloon time“, Zeit vom Arzt-Erstkontakt bis zum Beginn der Koronarintervention

C2DT:

„Contact-to-door time“, Zeit vom Arzt-Erstkontakt bis zur Krankenhausaufnahme

C2NT:

„Contact-to-needle time“, Zeit vom Arzt-Erstkontakt bis Start einer Lysetherapie

D2BT:

„Door-to-balloon time“, Zeit von der Krankenhausaufnahme bis zum Beginn der Koronarintervention

D2NT:

„Door-to-needle time“, Zeit von der Krankenhausaufnahme bis zum Start einer Lysetherapie

ESC:

European Society of Cardiology

HERA:

Herzinfarktnetzwerk Region Augsburg

P2CT:

„Pain-to-contact time“, Zeit vom Schmerzbeginn bis zum Arzt-Erstkontakt

PPCI:

Primäre perkutane Koronarintervention

STEMI:

ST-Strecken-Hebungsinfarkt

Literatur

  1. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW et al (2008) 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:210–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjorklund E, Stenestrand U, Lindback J et al (2006) Pre-hospital thrombolysis delivered by paramedics is associated with reduced time delay and mortality in ambulance-transported real-life patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 27:1146–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boersma E (2006) Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 27:779–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F et al (2009) Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Eur Heart J 1598–1606

  5. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y et al (2006) Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 355:2308–2320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown JP, Mahmud E, Dunford JV, Ben-Yehuda O (2008) Effect of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram on activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 101:158–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Canto JG, Zalenski RJ, Ornato JP et al (2002) Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2. Circulation 106:3018–3023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP et al (2005) Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 366:1622–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtis JP, Portnay EL, Wang Y et al (2006) The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000–2002: findings from the national registry of myocardial infarction-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1544–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrieres J et al (2008) Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the French registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI). Circulation 118:268–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danchin N, Durand E, Blanchard D (2008) Pre-hospital thrombolysis in perspective. Eur Heart J 29:2835–2842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhruva VN, Abdelhadi SI, Anis A et al (2007) ST-Segment analysis using wireless technology in acute myocardial infarction (STAT-MI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:509–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diercks DB, Kirk JD, Lindsell CJ et al (2006) Door-to-ECG time in patients with chest pain presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 24:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eagle KA, Nallamothu BK, Mehta RH et al (2008) Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. Eur Heart J 29:609–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R et al (2006) Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry). Circulation 113:2398–2405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (2006) Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet 367:579–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (2003) Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 361:13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Löwel H MC, Heier M, Hörmann A, Scheidt W von (2006) Herzinfarkt und koronare Sterblichkeit in Süddeutschland. Dtsch Arztebl 103:A616–A622

    Google Scholar 

  19. McNamara RL, Herrin J, Bradley EH et al (2006) Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J et al (2006) Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2180–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nallamothu B, Fox KA, Kennelly BM et al (2007) Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The global registry of acute coronary events. Heart 93:1552–1555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nallamothu BK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM (2007) Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 357:1631–1638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinto DS, Kirtane AJ, Nallamothu BK et al (2006) Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy. Circulation 114:2019–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S et al (2003) Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 108:2851–2856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Wallentin L (2006) Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 296:1749–1756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van de Werf F et al – Assessment of the safety and efficacy of a new treatment strategy with percutaneous coronary intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators (2006) Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 367:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:2909–2945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S et al (2001) Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty? Results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction registry and the myocardial infarction registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1827–1835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zahn R, Vogt A, Zeymer U et al (2005) In-hospital time to treatment of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: determinants and outcome. Results from the registry of percutaneous coronary interventions in acute myocardial infarction of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitender kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte. Heart 91:1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeymer U, Arntz HR, Dirks B et al (2009) Reperfusion rate and inhospital mortality of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosed already in the prehospital phase: results of the german prehospital myocardial infarction registry (PREMIR). Resuscitation 80:402–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Es wird dem ZRF Zweckverband Rettungsdienst Augsburg, den Notärzten und Kooperationskliniken (Aichach, Bobingen, Dillingen, Donauwörth, Friedberg, Schwabmünchen und Wertingen) gedankt. Darüber hinaus gilt unser Dank dem Personal der Intensivstation und des Herzkatheterlabors, den interventionellen Kardiologen und den Kollegen der Herzchirurgie.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Thilo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thilo, C., Blüthgen, A., Kuch, B. et al. Herzinfarktnetzwerk Region Augsburg (HERA). Notfall Rettungsmed 14, 128–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-010-1335-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-010-1335-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation