Skip to main content
Log in

Evidenzbasierte Medizin in der Notfallmedizin

EBNM/EBEM – Ein Rückblick

Evidence based emergency medicine (EBEM): a review

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Evidenzbasierte Notfallmedizin (EBNM) bzw. „evidence based emergency medicine“ (EBEM) ist ein Begriff, der zum Ausdruck bringen soll, dass Effektivität und Effizienz von Methoden, Verfahren, Medikationen etc. in der Notfallmedizin – wo immer möglich – durch wissenschaftliche Beweise belegt werden müssen, bevor sie in die ärztliche Praxis umgesetzt werden. Nur so kann die Lücke zwischen Forschung einerseits und klinischer Praxis andererseits überbrückt werden. Die Hintergründe der 10-jährigen Entwicklung der EBEM werden ebenso erwähnt wie Definitionen und Inhalte präzisiert. Für die Quellensuche sowie die Umsetzung der EBEM in die Praxis haben insbesondere die Cochrane-Kollaborationen, ILCOR, AWMF und andere Fachgesellschaften Bedeutung erlangt. Probleme und Grenzen der EBEM sind in der Vergangenheit evident geworden, sie werden auch für die Zukunft Bedeutung behalten.

Abstract

Evidence based (emergency) medicine EB(E)M is a term referring to the application into daily clinical practice of only those methods, procedures, medications etc. which are based on scientific evidence. This concept may allow to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, and represents the major goal of EB(E)M. The background of the development of EBEM over 10 years (from1997 to 2007) is summarized, and definitions as well as contents of the terminology are outlined. EBEM-resources are provided by the Cochrane collaborations, ILCOR, AWMF and other medical organizations. They also provide insights into guidelines and recommendations and are responsible for Knowledge Translation (KT) into clinical practice. Problems and limits of EBEM have been identified in the past, they will remain of importance even in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. American Heart Association (1997) ECC template for evidence based reviews. Curr Emerg Card Care 8: 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Heart Association, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2000) Guidelines 2000 for CPR and ECC: An international consensus on science. Resuscitation 46: 1–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastian H (2006) They would say that, wouldn’t they? A readers‘ guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research. J R Soc Med 99: 611–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calaham M (1992) Associate editors report: Review of papers submitted. Soc Acad Emerg Med IV: 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Centre for Evidence based Medicine (2006) Glossary. Key terms in EBP. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1116

  6. Cordell WH (2002) Evidence based emergency medicine. Online based emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 39: 178–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawes M (2001) Practice of evidence based medicine. University of Oxford, 9th April 2001, http://cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/

  8. Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Mayer I (2004) Teaching evidence based medicine. BMJ 329: 989–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dick, WF(1998) Evidence based emergency medicine. Anaesthesist 47: 957–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmond SD, Wyer PC, Brown MD et al. (2002) How relevant are the systematic reviews in the Cochrane library to the emergency medical practice? Ann Emerg Med 39: 153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evidence Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268: 2420–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guyatt G, Rennie D (1993) The users‘ guide to the medical literature. JAMA 270: 2096–2097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyatt GH (1997) Evidence based emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 30: 675–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC et al. (1995) Users‘ guides to the medical literature. A method for grading health care recommendations. JAMA 274: 1800–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2005) 2005 International Consensus on CPR and ECC science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 67: 157–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lecky F (1997) What is evidence based medicine? Eur J Emerg Med 4: 240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mackway-Jones K (2004) Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETS from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Emerg Med J 21: 199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mackway-Jones K, Carley SD, Morton RJ, Donnan S (1998) The best evidence topic report: a modified CAT for summarizing the available evidence in emergency medicine. J Accid Emerg Med 15: 222–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McAlister FA, Straus SE, Guyatt GH, Haynes RB (2000) Users‘ guides to the medical literature: XX. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient. Evidence-Based-Medicine Working Group. JAMA 283: 2829–2836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miles A (1997) Evidence-based medicine. Eur J Emerg Med 4: 246–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (1966) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Statement by the ad hoc committe on CPR of the Division of Medical Sciences. JAMA 198: 372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neale AV, Schwartz KL, Bowman MA (2005) Conflict of interest: Can we minimize ist influence in the biomedical literature? J Am Board Fam Pract 18: 411–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ospina MB, Kelly K, Klassen TP, Rowen BH (2006) Publication bias of RCTs in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 13: 102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Porzsold F, Kunz R (1997) Unterschiede zwischen Evidence-Based Medicine und konventionell bester Medizin. Med Klin 92: 567–569

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raspe H (1996) Evidence based medicine. Modischer Unsinn, alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen oder aktuelle Notwendigkeit? Zae F 90: 553–562

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenberg WM, Donald A (1995) Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem solving. BMJ 310: 1122–1126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM (1995) The need for EBM. J R Soc Med 88: 620–624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t? BMJ 312: 71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tonelli MR (1998) The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 73: 1234–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Waeckerle JF, Cordell WH, Wyer P, Osborn HH (1997) Evidence based emergency medicine: integrating research in practice. Ann Emerg Med 30: 626–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR et al. (1995) Users‘ guides to medical literature: VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274: 570–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR et al. (1995) Users‘ guides to the medical literature: VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. What are the recommendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274:1630–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wyer PC, Allen TY, Corrall CJ (2003) How to find evidence when you need it, part 4: Matching clinical questions to appropriate databases. Ann Emerg Med 42: 136–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wyer PC, Rowe BH, Guyatt GH, Cordell WH (2000) Evidence based emergency medicine. The clinician and the medical literature: when can we take a shortcut? Ann Emerg Med 36: 149–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yates D (1997) Randomized controlled trials and evidence based medicine – What’s in a name. Europ J Emerg Med 4: 123–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.F. Dick.

Additional information

Nach einem Vortrag auf dem Deutschen Anästhesiekongress 2007 in Hamburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dick, W. Evidenzbasierte Medizin in der Notfallmedizin. Notfall Rettungsmed 11, 6–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-007-1000-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-007-1000-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation