Abstract
Various strategies using a ventricular assist device (VAD) are applied to rescue Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 (Profile-1) patients. However, the optimal use of VAD in Profile-1 patients has not been completely elucidated. We retrospectively reviewed 23 Profile-1 patients [mean age 36.9 ± 16.6 years, 14 males; 11 with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), 9 with fulminant myocarditis (FM), 2 with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and 1 with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM); 18 with pre-operative percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p-ECMO) support] who underwent VAD implantation from 2011 to 2015 at our institution. Nine initially received left VAD (LVAD) alone (NICM in 9, ICM in 2 with ICM, and FM in 1), one with NICM received biventricular VAD (BiVAD; n = 1), and 10 received LVAD combined with right ventricular support using an ECMO circuit (BiVAD-ECMO) (FM in 8, NICM in 1, and PPCM in 1). Paracorporeal VAD was used in all patients. ECMO was used for the patients with severe pulmonary edema, inflammation, anemia, and thrombopenia. The BiVAD patient died 1.4 months after VAD implantation. The overall survival was comparable between patients with BiVAD-ECMO and LVAD (2-year survival, 80.0 and 75.0%, respectively). Three VAD strategies were initially applied in Profile-1 patients. Among them, the BiVAD-ECMO strategy is a promising therapeutic option to rescue Profile-1 patients with multiple organ failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, John R, Boyle AJ, Aaronson KD, Conte JV, Naka Y, Mancini D, Delgado RM, MacGillivray TE, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH, HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–96.
Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, Aaronson KD, John R, Boyle AJ, Conte JV, Bogaev RC, MacGillivray TE, Naka Y, Mancini D, Massey HT, Chen L, Klodell CT, Aranda JM, Moazami N, Ewald GA, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH, HeartMate II Investigators. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:312–21.
Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, Sun B, Tatooles AJ, Delgado RM 3rd, Long JW, Wozniak TC, Ghumman W, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH, HeartMate II Investigators. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–51.
Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Stevenson LW, Kormos RL, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Ulisney K, Young JB. INTERMACS database for durable devices for circulatory support: first annual report. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;10:1065–72.
Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, Myers SL, Miller MA, Baldwin JT, Young JB. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1495–504.
Estep JD, Starling RC, Horstmanshof DA, Milano CA, Selzman CH, Shah KB, Loebe M, Moazami N, Long JW, Stehlik J, Kasirajan V, Haas DC, O’Connell JB, Boyle AJ, Farrar DJ, Rogers JG, ROADMAP Study Investigators. Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: results from the ROADMAP Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1747–61.
Suwa H, Seguchi O, Fujita T, Murata Y, Hieda M, Watanabe T, Sato T, Sunami H, Yanase M, Hata H, Nakatani T. Paracorporeal ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant candidacy in the era of implantable continuous-flow ventricular assist device. J Artif Org. 2014;17:16–22.
Toda K, Fujita T, Kobayashi J, Shimahara Y, Kitamura S, Seguchi O, Murata Y, Yanase M, Nakatani T. Impact of preoperative percutaneous cardiopulmonary support on outcome following left ventricular assist device implantation. Circ J. 2012;76:88–95.
Nakajima S, Seguchi O, Fujita T, Hata H, Yamashita K, Sato T, Sunami H, Yanase M, Fukushima N, Kobayashi J, Nakatani T. Successful treatment of near-fatal fulminant myocarditis using bi-ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:293–6.
Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Kato N, Muraoka H, Fujino T, Inaba T, Maki H, Kinoshita O, Hatano M, Kyo S, Ono M. Late-onset right ventricular failure in patients with preoperative small left ventricle after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2014;78:625–33.
Riebandt J, Haberl T, Mahr S, Laufer G, Rajek A, Steinlechner B, Schima H, Zimpfer D. Preoperative patient optimization using extracorporeal life support improves outcomes of INTERMACS Level I patients receiving a permanent ventricular assist device. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:486–92 (discussion 492).
Guenther S, Theiss HD, Fischer M, Sattler S, Peterss S, Born F, Pichlmaier M, Massberg S, Hagl C, Khaladj N. Percutaneous extracorporeal life support for patients in therapy refractory cardiogenic shock: initial results of an interdisciplinary team. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18:283–91.
Loforte A, Marinelli G, Musumeci F, Folesani G, Pilato E, Martin Suarez S, Montalto A, Lilla Della Monica P, Grigioni F, Frascaroli G, Menichetti A, Di Bartolomeo R, Arpesella G. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in refractory cardiogenic shock: treatment strategies and analysis of risk factors. Artif Org. 2014;38:E129–41.
Boulate D, Luyt CE, Pozzi M, Niculescu M, Combes A, Leprince P, Kirsch M. Acute lung injury after mechanical circulatory support implantation in patients on extracorporeal life support: an unrecognized problem. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:544–9 (discussion 549–50).
Pages ON, Aubert S, Combes A, Luyt CE, Pavie A, Léger P, Gandjbakhch I, Leprince P. Paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-extracorporeal life support in adult fulminant myocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:194–7.
Aggarwal A, Modi S, Kumar S, Korrapati C, Tatooles A, Pappas PS, Bhat G. Use of a single-circuit CentriMag® for biventricular support in postpartum cardiomyopathy. Perfusion. 2013;28:156–9.
Fitzpatrick JR 3rd, Frederick JR, Hiesinger W, Hsu VM, McCormick RC, Kozin ED, Laporte CM, O’Hara ML, Howell E, Dougherty D, Cohen JE, Southerland KW, Howard JL, Paulson EC, Acker MA, Morris RJ, Woo YJ. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:971–7.
Acknowledgements
We thank Yuzo Takahashi, Hideki Yotsuida, Hiroshi Nishioka, Megumi Komiyama, Rieko Sakai, Eri Miyoshi, Ai Nagayo, Nobuaki Konishi, Shiho Tsuboi, and Yumiko Hori for their roles in providing patient care.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors declare any competing interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seguchi, O., Fujita, T., Watanabe, T. et al. Temporary biventricular support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a feasible therapeutic approach for cardiogenic shock with multiple organ failure. J Artif Organs 20, 206–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0966-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0966-5