Abstract
In objective image quality metrics, one of the most important factors is the correlation of their results with the perceived quality measurements. In this paper, a new method is presented based on comparing between the structural properties of the two compared images. Based on the mathematical concept of the singular value decomposition (SVD) theorem, each matrix can be factorized to the products of three matrices, one of them related to the luminance value while the two others show the structural content information of the image. A new method to quantify the quality of images is proposed based on the projected coefficients and the left singular vector matrix of the disturbed image based on the right singular vector matrix of the original image. To evaluate this performance, many tests have been done using a widespread subjective study involving 779 images of the Live Image Quality Assessment Database, Release 2005. The objective results show a high rate of correlation with subjective quality measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. M. Eskicioglu: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Turkey, 2000, Vol. 4, p. 1907.
A. M. Eskicioglu and P. S. Fisher: IEEE Trans. Commun. 43 (1995) 2959.
H. R. Sheihk, A. C. Bovic, and G. de Veciana: IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14 (2005) 2117.
Z. Wang and A. C. Bovic: IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9 (2002) 81.
Z. Wang, A. C. Bovic, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli: IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13 (2004) 600.
Z. Wang, E. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovic: Proc. IEEE 37th Asilomar Conf. Signal, Systems and Computers, PacificGrove, CA, 2003.
H. R. Sheihk and A. C. Bovic: IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 (2006) 430.
S. Daly: The Visible Difference Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity, Digital Image and Human Vision (MIT Press, 1993) p. 179.
J. Lubin: Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995) p. 207.
A. M. Eskicioglu, A. Gusev, and A. Shnayderman: IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 (2006) 422.
M. Miyahara, K. Kotani, and V. R.: IEEE Trans. Commun. 46 (1998) 1215.
F. Torkamani-Azar and S. A. Amirshahi: IEEE Int. Symp. 9th Signal Processing and Its Applications, Sharjeh, ISSPA07, 2007.
A. Mahmoudi Aznaveh, A. Mansouri, F. Torkamani-Azar, and M. Eslami: Opt. Rev. 6 (2009) 30.
A. K. Jain: Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).
B. Davis and J. Uhl: Matrices, Geometry and Mathematica, Math Everywhere (Inc., 1999) Part of the “Calculus and Mathematica” series of books.
H. R. Sheikh, Z. Wang, L. Cormack, and A. C. Bovik: Live Image Quality Assessment Database, Release 2005: http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality.
H. R. Sheihk, M. F. Sabir, and A. C. Bovic: IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 (2006) 3441.
A. M. Rohaly, J. Libert, P. Corriveau, and A. Webster: Final Report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment, 2000.
G. H. Chen, C. L. Yang, and S. L. Xie: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image, Atlanta, 2006, p. 2929.
G. H. Chen, C. L. Yang, L. M. Po, and S. L. Xie: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mansouri, A., Aznaveh, A.M., Torkamani-Azar, F. et al. Image quality assessment using the singular value decomposition theorem. OPT REV 16, 49–53 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-009-0010-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-009-0010-y