Abstract
The Fens is a region that contributes 11% of the agri-food economy from just 4% of the agricultural land covering England (UK). This region is vulnerable to soil salinisation from sea-level rise with estimated 100-year flood events projected to be observed up to every 2 years by 2100. Seawater intrusion and upwelling of saline groundwater can provide an additional pathway; however, the area’s groundwater has not been assessed and the risk is unknown. This study used data from the British Geological Survey’s stratigraphic core archive to produce the first stratigraphic map of the loosely consolidated Holocene deposits in the South Holland–Holbeach Marsh region. There is a sandy unconfined aquifer towards the coast, a semiconfined central region with a silty cap and a clay confining cap in the north region. Electrical resistivity tomography data indicate water level depths of 0.58 ± 0.37 m above mean sea level (msl) in February 2021 and 0.01 ± 0.72 m msl in August 2021. The saline–freshwater boundary was at 1.70 ± 0.82 m msl in February 2021, deepening to 2.00 ± 1.02 m msl in August 2021, but the only evidence of seasonal fluctuation was within 10 km of the coast. A potential, but unverified, freshwater lens up to 3.25 m thick may exist beneath the surface. These results suggest that freshwater–saline interface fluctuations may primarily be driven by surface hydrology and would be vulnerable to climate-change-induced future variations in factors that affect surface water.
Résumé
Les Fens est. une région qui contribue pour 11% à l’économie agro-alimentaire, à partir de seulement 4% des terres agricoles couvrant l’Angleterre (Royaume Uni). Cette région est. exposée à une salinisation des sols due à la remontée du niveau de la mer, avec des inondations centennales qui devraient être observées jusqu’à tous les 2 ans d’ici à 2100. L’intrusion de l’eau de mer et la remontée d’eaux souterraines salées peuvent offrir un cheminement supplémentaire, mais les eaux souterraines de la région n’ont pas été évaluées et ce risque est. inconnu. La présente étude a utilisé les données provenant des archives de base stratigraphiques du Service Géologique de Grande Bretagne pour produire la première carte stratigraphique des dépôts holocènes faiblement consolidés de la région sud du Holland-Holbeach Marsh. Il y a un aquifère libre sableux près de la côte, une région centrale semi-captive sous couverture silteuse et un recouvrement argileux confinant dans la région nord. Les données issues d’une tomographie de résistivité électrique indiquent des profondeurs du niveau de l’eau de 0.58 ± 0.37 m au-dessus du niveau moyen de la mer (nmm) en février 2021 et de 0.01 ± 0.72 m nmm en août 2021. La limite eau-salée–eau douce était à 1.70 ± 0.82 m nmm en Février 2021, s’approfondissant à 2.00 ± 1.02 m nmm en Août 2021, mais la seule preuve de fluctuations saisonnières était à moins de 10 km de la côte. Une lentille d’eau douce potentielle, mais non vérifiée, atteignant 3.25 m d’épaisseur, peut exister en-dessous de la surface. Ces résultats suggèrent que les fluctuations de l’interface eau douce–eau salée peuvent être contrôlées principalement par l’hydrologie de surface et seraient sensibles aux variations futures, induites par le changement climatique, des facteurs qui impactent l’eau de surface.
Resumen
Los Fens son una región que aporta el 11% de la economía agroalimentaria a partir de sólo el 4% de las tierras agrícolas que cubren Inglaterra (Reino Unido). Esta región es vulnerable a la salinización del suelo debido a la elevación del nivel del mar, ya que se prevé que las inundaciones de 100 años se produzcan hasta cada dos años de aquí a 2100. La intrusión del agua del mar y el afloramiento de aguas subterráneas salinas pueden constituir una fuente adicional, pero las aguas subterráneas de la zona no han sido evaluadas y se desconoce el riesgo. Este estudio utilizó datos del archivo de columnas estratigráficas del Servicio Geológico Británico para elaborar el primer mapa del Holoceno poco consolidado en la región de South Holland-Holbeach Marsh. Existe un acuífero arenoso no confinado hacia la costa, una región central semiconfinada con una cubierta de limos y una capa confinada por arcilla en la región norte. Los datos de tomografía de resistividad eléctrica indican profundidades de nivel de agua de 0.58 ± 0.37 m sobre el nivel medio del mar (msl) en febrero de 2021 y 0.01 ± 0.72 m msl en agosto de 2021. El límite entre el agua salada y el agua dulce se encuentra a 1.70 ± 0.82 m sobre el nivel del mar en febrero de 2021, y se profundiza hasta 2.00 ± 1.02 m sobre el nivel del mar en agosto de 2021, pero la única evidencia de fluctuación estacional se encuentra a 10 km de la costa. Bajo la superficie puede existir una lente de agua dulce de hasta 3.25 m de espesor, aunque no se ha verificado. Estos resultados sugieren que las fluctuaciones de la interfaz agua dulce–salada pueden ser provocadas principalmente por la hidrología de la superficie y serían vulnerables a las variaciones futuras inducidas por el cambio climático en los factores que afectan al agua superficial.
摘要
Fens仅占英格兰(英国)农业土地的4%,农业用品经济却占11%。该地区容易受到海平面上升影响产生土壤盐碱化问题,估计到2100年预计每2年观察到100年一遇的洪水事件。海水入侵和盐水的升锥可以提供额外的途径,但是该地区地下水未能开展评估工作,而且风险尚不清楚。 这项研究使用了英国地质调查局的地层岩心档案馆中的数据,以制作首个South Holland和Holbeach Marsh地区松散固结的全新世沉积物地层图。海岸有一个砂质承压含水层,北部地区有粉质盖层和粘土承压盖层的半承压中央区域。 电阻层析成像数据表明,2021年2月的水位深度在平均海平面(MSL)以上0.58 ± 0.37 m,在2021年8月的水位深度为0.01 ± 0.72 m msl。 咸淡水界面在2021年2月是1.70 ± 0.82 m msl,2021年8月至2.00 ± 1.02 m msl,但唯一的季节性波动证据在海岸10公里以内。 潜力(但未验证)可能存在于表面下面的3.25 m厚的淡水透镜体。 这些结果表明,淡水 – 咸水界面的波动可能主要由地表水文驱动,并且很容易受到气候变化引起的未来地表水因素的变化。
Resumo
The Fens é uma região que contribui com 11% da economia agroalimentar de apenas 4% das terras agrícolas que cobrem a Inglaterra (Reino Unido). Esta região é vulnerável à salinização do solo devido ao aumento do nível do mar, com estimativas de eventos de inundação para 100 anos projetados para serem observados a cada 2 anos até 2100. A intrusão da água do mar e a ressurgência de águas subterrâneas salinas podem fornecer um caminho adicional, no entanto, as águas subterrâneas da área não foram avaliadas e o risco é desconhecido. Este estudo utilizou dados do arquivo do núcleo estratigráfico do Serviço Geológico Britânico para produzir o primeiro mapa estratigráfico dos depósitos pouco consolidados do Holoceno na região de South Holland-Holbeach Marsh. Há um aquífero arenoso livre em direção à costa, uma região central semi-confinada com uma capa siltosa e uma capa confinante de argila na região norte. Dados de tomografia de resistividade elétrica indicam profundidades do nível da água de 0.58 ± 0.37 m acima do nível médio do mar (nmm) em fevereiro de 2021 e 0.01 ± 0.72 m nmm em agosto de 2021. O limite salino-água doce estava em 1.70 ± 0.82 m nmm em fevereiro de 2021, aprofundando-se para 2.00 ± 1.02 m nmm em agosto de 2021, mas a única evidência de flutuação sazonal estava dentro de 10 km da costa. Uma lente de água doce potencial, mas não verificada, de até 3.25 m de espessura pode existir abaixo da superfície. Esses resultados sugerem que as flutuações da interface água doce-salina podem ser causadas principalmente pela hidrologia de superfície e seriam vulneráveis a variações futuras induzidas pelas mudanças climáticas em fatores que afetam as águas superficiais.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Salinisation in the United Kingdom (UK)
Salinisation of soil poses a serious threat for food production in many regions across Europe affecting around 30.7 Mha (Daliakopoulos et al. 2016; Gould et al. 2022; Ruto et al. 2022). This is particularly the case in the flat low-lying Holocene deposits of northern Europe—for example, in the coastal Netherlands, salt levels are projected to increase up to 140% as a result of saline seepage from sea level rise (Oude Essink et al. 2010). This increase in salt load may affect the salinity of the root zone, inducing soil salinisation.
Soil salinisation is not currently recognised as a major concern because there is significant rainfall in the winter coupled with low evaporation rates, allowing for any salt accumulation during the summer to be flushed in the winter (Cooper et al. 2010). However, coastal inundation is identified as a risk of soil salinisation for low-lying areas such as the Anglian coastal Fens, particularly since flooding is the UK’s most serious natural hazard (Thorne 2014). The risk is especially high along the east coast that borders the North Sea characterised by extremely low-lying marshlands and wetlands (Daliakopoulos et al. 2016). The North Sea is well known for its storm surges, with 19 storm surge events of varying severity impacting the east coast of England between 1897 and 2007 along with a further devastating storm surge recorded in December 2013 (Spencer et al. 2015). These events have led to the inundation of agricultural land with seawater and thus resulted in the loss of crop yields. Flooding events on the east coast could have significant economic impacts and may affect up to 340,000 ha of cultivated crops at an estimated cost of around £5,000/ha, which could lead to longer-term yield penalties as saline soil recovers over multiple years (Gould et al. 2020).
Furthermore, under Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5), both mean sea level (MSL) rise and storm surge event frequencies are projected to increase more in the North Sea region than anywhere else across Europe’s coastlines, leading to 100-year flood events, potentially being observed as frequently as every 20 years by 2050 or every 2 years by 2100 (Vousdoukas et al. 2017). Consequently, soils may not have time to fully recover from salinisation (Cooper et al. 2010).
Historically, groundwater research in the UK (England predominantly) has focussed on deep confined aquifers which typically are used for domestic water use (Barker et al. 1998; Hiscock et al. 1996; Mackay et al. 2015; Tellam et al. 1986). It is also well established that sea level rise has negligible effects on the placement of the freshwater–saline interface (Werner et al. 2012), whereas the impact on unconfined shallow coastal aquifers is debated (Ataie-Ashtiani et al. 1999; Kuan et al. 2012; Mao et al. 2006; Werner and Lockington 2006). Furthermore, the exploitation of unconfined shallow coastal aquifers for fresh groundwater resources can result in the lowering of the water table, sea-water intrusion, and upwelling of deep saline groundwater into shallow groundwater systems (Alfarrah and Walraevens 2018; Ferguson and Gleeson 2012; Klassen and Allen 2017). Currently, the authors are aware of only one other study in the UK, in Northern Ireland, that has surveyed and mapped shallow coastal groundwater systems using geophysical techniques which will inform evidence-based policy ensuring sustainable groundwater abstraction Águila et al. (2022).
UK Fens Agriculture
The Fens of eastern England contributes 11% of the agri-food economy from just 4% of England’s agricultural land. Approximately, 50% of England’s grade 1 (i.e. most productive) soils are located in this area producing a third of England’s vegetables (NFU 2019). The high productivity of The Fens requires access to an abundant supply of water as 21.5% of all of England’s intensive crops are grown in the region with an approximate value of £750 m (NFU 2019).
Climate projections in the UK show hotter and drier summers and warmer and wetter winters for the region (Lowe et al. 2018). The region of East Anglia has observed the greatest annual average temperature rise seen across the UK, increasing by more than 1 °C relative to the 1961–1990 average (Kendon et al. 2021), resulting in an increase in agricultural irrigation and is likely to be a major factor in why the water demand for irrigated cropping in South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area is amongst the highest in England reaching over 15,000 m3 for every 2 km2 (Knox et al. 2013).
The agricultural drought in 2018 highlighted the severity of the water stress in this area with many growers exhausting their licenced volume of water (Knox et al. 2020), and restrictions on agricultural irrigation were implemented in some areas (NFU 2019). In addition, climate change is predicted to increase the frequency and severity of droughts in the east of England adding further pressures to water resources. The source of most irrigation that takes place in The Fens is mains water from the public water supply (Water Resources East 2021) and in eastern England alone an extra 284 million litres of water per day will be required for agriculture by 2050 (Environment Agency 2020a); thus, The Fens are recognised as a region of increasing irrigation intensity (Weatherhead et al. 2014). The importance for adaption to the future climate was recognised for the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area in the recent COP26 conference to ensure England does not become increasingly reliant on food imports (Water Resources East 2021).
Consequently, stakeholders in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area have started to gain interest in the possibility of abstracting fresh groundwater from the shallow aquifer beneath the coastal Fens as an alternative source of freshwater for agricultural irrigation; however, abstraction in 28% of groundwater bodies in the UK is currently unsustainable (Environment Agency 2018) and abstraction for irrigation is highest in eastern England (Knox et al. 2020). This may be detrimental to the quality of groundwater in low-lying coastal areas as unsustainable groundwater pumping has a greater and more rapid negative effect on groundwater salinisation than sea level rise (Ferguson and Gleeson 2012).
In the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area, one method of abstraction is via catch-pits to fill storage reservoirs. If freshwater abstracted from the catch-pits was used for irrigation directly, an increased risk of water-table drawdown would result in a risk of saline seepage (Environment Agency 2020b). A further source of irrigation water is from surface-water abstraction; however, regarding farm water, testing finds these to be increasingly saline, with the likely saline source from subsurface waters. Landowners are permitted to abstract up to 20 m3 of water per day without a licence; however, the amount of low-level abstraction that takes place is unknown. This is of particular concern as the groundwater system is unquantified in this area of The Fens as it has not been thoroughly assessed (Environment Agency 2020b; Rey et al. 2016).
Consequently, there is uncertainty about the threat of groundwater salinisation, and the sustainable management of groundwater systems cannot be achieved without the understanding of the stratigraphy or the geometry of the groundwater system. Therefore, given the importance of this area to the UK’s agricultural productivity, it is of utmost importance to investigate the spatio-temporal distribution of the groundwater in the coastal shallow aquifer of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area.
This study aims to develop the first spatial interpretation of the risk of salinisation from groundwater in this region. The output will be the first maps of (1) the stratigraphy; (2) the water table; (3) freshwater–saline interface, and (4) the freshwater lens thickness of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh coastal shallow groundwater system.
Methodology
Topography, Geology, and Hydrology of Study Site
The study area is the coastal region of South Holland-Holbeach Marsh. Fenland soils comprise drained peatlands in Cambridgeshire, West Norfolk and parts of Lincolnshire, alongside Alluvial silt topsoils of South Lincolnshire. The location of the study is in the silty Anglian coastal Fens in the east of England bordering the North Sea and confined by the River Welland and the River Nene. In total it covers an area of around 35,000 ha which is predominantly used for agriculture with the main crop types being vegetables, potatoes, cereals and sugar beet (NFU 2008).
The Ordnance Survey’s OS Terrain® 50 digital terrain model with a resolution of 50 m reveals that the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh topography is typically flat with a mean elevation of 2.25 m msl (Fig. 1). The highest point lies 7 m msl and is located in the centre of the study area northeast, whilst the lowest lying land is located in the south of the study area lying up to −2.10 m msl (Ordnance Survey 2021).
Topography of the study area (box) in South Holland-Holbeach Marsh in south Lincolnshire (outlined) in The Fens of eastern England, United Kingdom (UK). The neighbouring region of East Anglia is shown in light blue on the map of UK. Topographic data provided by Ordnance Survey (2021). UK boundary data from UK Data Service (2022a, b) as open data under an OGL licence and the Republic of Ireland and Isle of Man boundary data from DIVA-GIS (DIVA-GIS 2022a, b)
The soils are mostly calcareous, silty alluvial gleysols as classified by the World Reference Base system. Gleysols are derived from a range of unconsolidated parent materials including Holocene age marine sediments and can be found in temperate lowlands with shallow groundwater (IUSS Working Group WRB 2015). Once drained, gleysols can be cultivated for agriculture due to their fine soil texture and low rate of organic matter decomposition. As such, grade 1 soil, as classified by the then Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF 1988), lies over the majority of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area (i.e. most productive). These soils allow for a range of crops to be grown with very little limitation to agriculture, with high yields typically of low variability in comparison to lesser quality soil (MAFF 1988), which is reflected in the higher value nature of cropping in the region (e.g. potatoes, salads, brassicas).
The superficial geology of The Fens is of Quaternary-age and mostly Holocene epoch marine alluvium (i.e. tidal flat deposits). These were formed through changes in sea level leading to multiple advances and retreats causing over 26 m of marine and estuarine clays, silts, and sands, now known as the Silt Fens, to be deposited (Natural England 2013; Sturt 2006). Based on typical hydraulic conductivities of unconsolidated sedimentary materials (Domenico and Schwartz 1997), this study considers the sand to be the shallow aquifer, the clay to be an aquitard and the silt to have low porosity.
The superficial deposits overlay the Jurassic-age bedrock geology of West Walton formation composed of Ampthill Clay and Kimmeridge Clay (undifferentiated), which are underlain by the (unproductive) Oxford Clay Formation which has negligible significance for water supply due to its low permeability, much lower than the aforementioned formations (Allen et al. 1997; Gallois and Cox 1976).
The South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area is located between the rivers Welland and Nene, which together drain an area of 395,000 ha. Weather data is collected and reported by the Met Office Hadley Centre (Parker et al. 1992; Alexander and Jones 2000). The mean annual temperature (1991–2020) for this region is 10.41 °C with a mean annual rainfall of 623.12 mm (Met Office 2021). In 2021, central England (which includes the east of England) had an annual rainfall of 660.8 mm with 248.90 mm falling in the winter (December, January, and February) and 146.50 mm falling in the summer (June, July, August) (Met Office 2021). The mean temperature for 2021 was 10.26 °C, with a mean temperature of 4.40 °C in the winter and 16.3 °C in the summer (Met Office 2021).
During the study, the region underwent periods of extreme weather. The combined total rainfall of December 2020 and January 2021 in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area was the wettest period on record. The Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire region had 246 and 223% increase in average rainfall for December 2020 and January 2021, respectively (Environment Agency 2021b, d), which was compounded by low evaporation rates due to an average temperature of 3.1 °C in January (Met Office 2021). By comparison, the rainfall observed during July and August in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area had less deviation from the long-term average, 105 and 43%, respectively (Environment Agency 2021a, e); furthermore, July was the hottest month of the year with an average temperature of 17.7 °C (Met Office 2021).
The British Oceanographic Data Centre does not have a tidal gauging station for The Wash (the 62,046-ha rectangular bay consisting of multiple estuaries which forms the coast of The Fens, see Fig. 1). Therefore, to understand the tidal fluctuations in The Wash tide heights at the two nearest tidal gauges, at the towns of Cromer and Immingham, were used. Cromer is located around 70 km east of The Wash and Immingham is located around 85 km north of The Wash at the River Humber estuary. At Cromer the tide height ranged from –0.76–5.34 m in the winter with a mean of 2.75 ± 1.29 m, whilst in the summer the tide height ranged from 0.52–5.28 m with a mean of 2.94 ± 1.18 m. At Immingham the tide height ranged from 0.45–7.58 m in the winter with a mean of 4.25 ± 1.71 m, whilst in the summer the tide height ranged from 0.72–7.49 m with a mean of 4.27 ± 1.68 m (British Oceanographic Data Centre 2021).
Mapping Aquifer Stratigraphy
To map the aquifer’s stratigraphy, a reconstruction process was completed by compiling 122 previously logged British Geological Survey (BGS) stratigraphic core records (BGS 2020)—see section A of the electronic supplementary material ESM1—for the compiled record. The oldest stratigraphic core was taken 136 years ago in 1885, whilst the latest stratigraphic core was taken 9 years prior to the study in 2012 and 95% of the cores were collected and logged between 1938 and 2002. The historical stratigraphic cores were also used to help infer the ERT results later in this study and, as a result, the stratigraphic cores that were not of a length to make contact with the water level were removed from this study. After an initial review of all stratigraphic cores, the substrata were divided into three sedimentary categories—clay, silt, or sand. Out of the 122 stratigraphic cores, 78 also included the depth at which the water level (m bgl) was met. The stratigraphy was modelled using BGS Groundhog 2.5 software (BGS 2021) with a 50 m × 50 m digital elevation model supplied from the Ordnance Survey (Ordnance Survey 2021). The Nearest Neighbour interpretation method, built into Groundhog 2.5, was used to create the prediction surfaces for each layer of the stratigraphy. These prediction surfaces were then exported as raster layers. Finally, using ArcGIS 10.8, the prediction surfaces were clipped to fit the study area with the National Characters Area shapefile published by Natural England (Natural England 2021) and layered on top of each other to create the geological map (Fig. 3).
Geophysical Techniques to Map Shallow Groundwater Systems
One-dimensional (1D) geophysical techniques such as vertical electrical sounding and the profiling method have been used in the past to provide resistivity surveys of the subsurface century (Dahlin 2001; Gish and Rooney 1925; Koefoed 1979). However, these 1D electrical survey techniques produce inferred results with limited accuracy as they assume that the stratigraphy of the subsurface is homogenous in either the vertical or horizontal plane (Loke 1999).
More recently, two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has become an increasingly popular method of surveying the groundwater in shallow coastal aquifers around the world (Aladejana et al. 2020; Águila et al. 2022; Hermans and Paepen 2020). Due to the difference in typical resistivity that characterises fresh groundwater (10–100 Ω) and seawater (0.2 Ω), the water level and freshwater–saline interfaces in shallow aquifers in coastal areas can be accurately mapped (Loke 1999). Furthermore, this method is noninvasive and thus is suitable for all soil types and is relatively cost-effective in comparison to other population techniques such as cone penetration tests (e.g. Pauw et al. 2017).
The resistivity results of 2D ERT are dependent upon both the geological properties of the coastal shallow aquifer and the salinity of the groundwater. As a result, it is frequently found that geophysical data cannot clearly distinguish between the interval changes in saturation and salinity in the groundwater (i.e the water level and freshwater–saline interface) from geological features, especially in low resistivity superficial geology (Szalai et al. 2009). Therefore, calibration of inferred water levels and freshwater–saline interfaces is required through corroborating information from hydrogeological data; one of the favoured methods of calibration is through stratigraphic core (lithological log) records (Galazoulas et al. 2015). Therefore, using an integrated approach with geophysical results and geotechnical information used in tandem the certainty and robustness of the inferred groundwater level is higher.
Site Selection and Geophysical Analysis
The first fieldwork campaign took place between the 1st and 12th of February 2021 and the second fieldwork campaign was carried out between the 24th and 29th of August 2021 to allow for maximum seasonal change to occur. Historically (1991–2020) in Holbeach February is the coldest and second driest month of the year with an average minimum temperature of 1.70 °C and an average rainfall of 38.53 mm and August is the warmest and wettest month in Holbeach with an average maximum temperature of 21.78 °C and an average rainfall of 64.18 mm (Met Office 2021). Two-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was used to survey the water level and freshwater–saline interface in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh shallow aquifer. ERT is a well-established method that measures the resistivity distribution in ohm-metres (Ωm) across predetermined survey lines allowing for an indirect measure (proxy) of subsurface hydrogeological heterogeneities such as changes in stratigraphy or groundwater and is also a well-established method to assess freshwater–saline interfaces in coastal aquifers (Loke 1999).
The Allied Tigre earth resistance metre was used with a 32-electrode cable to survey the groundwater in the subsurface, whereby 27 sites were selected (Fig. 2) mostly adjacent to existing BGS cores, which allowed for single borehole-to-surface ERT measurements, whilst maintaining a good spatial spread covering the study area as best as possible. A cross-hole configuration was not used as the stratigraphic core separation/depth ratio was greater than 1, which would have produced inaccurate results (Tsourlos et al. 2011). The electrodes were spaced 2.5 m apart, allowing for good resolution and a satisfactory investigatory depth of 12 m. The total length of the survey line was 77.5 m. Each electrode was secured to the soil beneath with a steel peg, and resistance checks were carried out with software RES2DINV to ensure contact resistances were not inordinate. The processing software used in this study, RES2DINV, allows for changes in topography across long survey lines to be accounted for in the data processing, and due to the extremely flat nature of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area, it was determined that the slight changes in elevation between each electrode would be negligible in regard to survey quality. The survey lines were, where possible, orientated perpendicular relative to the local coastline (NE–SW). The surveys obtained subsurface resistivity measurements using the Wenner (α) array. This array was selected over other commonly used electrode arrays in environmental geophysics (Wenner-Schlumberger and Dipole-Dipole) due to its sensitivity to vertical changes in the subsurface whilst maintaining a good investigatory depth (Barker 1979; Loke 1999; Reynolds 2011).
The raw resistivity results, processed in RES2DINV, showed the subsurface strata resistivity variations for each survey site. These were checked with information from the historical stratigraphic core records previously collated in this study to cross-check and identify possible changes in geology or ground condition which may have needed to have been accounted for. The field area was selected specifically to ensure that geological, geomorphological, and hydrological factors were likely to be as consistent as possible. Then each ERT profile was processed and analysed individually on its own merits and then these profiles were brought together and assessed collectively to establish both local/regional links and patterns as well as to identify outliers in the observed data.
To determine the unsaturated, semisaturated, saturated (freshwater), and saline interface, distinctive rates of change in resistivity were required that were broadly observed and reproducible across the area. Upon analysis of all the ERT survey data, these values were determined to be of the following characteristic trend: ×1.25–1.75 apparent resistivity decrease inferred the change between unsaturated zone (near surface soils) and the semisaturated and saturated (freshwater) zone, and a ×4–×5 decrease inferred the depth of the interface between fresh and saline water.
Apparent resistivity is reported as it is a weighted average of resistivity across the survey lines, which helps smooth out localised variations that are poorly understood given the poorly studied nature of the region.
Interpolating Electrical Resistivity Tomography Results using Geostatistics
The water level and freshwater–saline interface was inferred from the processed ERT data (see section ‘Mapping aquifer stratigraphy’). To create a prediction layer for the study area, R studio was used, which utilises different packages for geospatial analysis. To spatially interpolate the point data, the “autoKrige” function (part of the automap package (Hiemstra 2015), which executes automatic kriging on the data points collected at each ERT survey site, was also used. The autokrige function automatically generates an omnidirectional variogram and fits it to 1 of 3 models (spherical, exponential or gaussian), after which a prediction surface is outputted at a 50 m × 50 m resolution. This process was repeated for the winter water level and freshwater–saline interface and summer water level and freshwater–saline interface. Cross-validation was also carried out during the geostatistical analysis using the ‘autokrige.cv’ function in the ‘automap’ library to ensure as little error as possible. Each prediction surface was then exported as a raster layer and imported into ArcGIS. The raster layers were clipped to fit the study area and the final figures were produced. A freshwater lens thickness map for both seasons was also produced by calculating the difference between the water level depth and freshwater–saline interface depth at each survey site (freshwater lens thickness = freshwater–saline interface – water level).
Electrical Resistivity Tomography Validation
To validate the ERT results, the water level depth inferred from the ERT surveys was compared to measured water level depths documented on past stratigraphic cores located next to the ERT survey sites. Of the 27 ERT survey sites, 10 had adjacent stratigraphic cores with documented water levels and ages ranging from 1963 to 2012 with a mean of 1,976 ± 4.71 years. During this time the water level in The Fens remained relatively stable (Dawson et al. 2010) which allowed this data to be sufficient to validate this study’s ERT results against.
A lack of fit test (Whitmore 1991), Pearson’s correlation, and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) were analysed. All analysis was performed in R using the basic functions along with the alr4, and Metrics package for Pearson’s correlation, lack of fit test, and RMSE, respectively.
Results
Stratigraphy
The South Holland-Holbeach Marsh stratigraphy follows a layer cake formation with three facies; on top is a clay cap, followed by a middle layer of silt and a bottom layer of sand (Fig. 3). The clay cap is mostly present in the north of the region and extends southwest inland adjacent to the River Welland. The silt facies outcrops across the central area of the study area extending to the River Nene in the southeast. Within the silt outcrop relatively small clay caps are found such as the one that the Market Town of Holbeach is situated on. The sand facies outcrops at the coast in the northeast of the study area and broadens into Long Sutton adjacent to the River Nene. The sand is observed to outcrop again around 18 km inland southwest from the coast.
Electrical Resistivity Tomography
The following section describes the general pattern of the raw ERT data for all 27 ERT surveyed sites. Please see the supplementary information for the raw ERT survey files in ESM2, and see ESM1 for each individual ERT survey output.
Winter Survey raw ERT Results
For the winter survey, the apparent resistivity of the upper layers (1.5–2.5 m bgl) was mostly characterised by a relatively high apparent resistivity between 50 and 175 Ωm (typically >75 Ωm), which indicates that soils are restricted to depth of no more than 1.5–2.5 m bgl (upper horizon) and was inferred as the unsaturated zone within the stratum. Below this, typically between 1.5 and 3.0 m bgl, the apparent resistivity was lower, mostly between 8 and 50 Ωm (typically <45 Ωm), but gradually decreasing with depth. This was interpreted as the partially saturated and upper-saturated zone of the water level between depths of 1.5 and 3.0 m bgl. Further down the apparent resistivity decreased exponentially with depth below ~2.5 and 3.5 m bgl with the characteristic electrical resistance being 4–5 times smaller in the lower saturated zone than the upper saturated zone.
The apparent resistivities of a representative coastal survey site (MM02) and a representative inland site (MM23) are shown in Fig. 4a,b respectively. The coastal MM02 has apparent resistivity values of 16–18 Ωm, 3.75–5 Ωm, and 1.85–2.4 Ωm at depths of 4, 8, and 12m bgl, respectively, whilst the inland MM23 has apparent resistivity values of 34–36 Ωm, 13.5–14.5 Ωm, 4.5–6 Ωm, respectively.
Summer Survey raw ERT Results
In the summer, the apparent resistivity indicated that the soils at depths between 0.5–1.5 m were characterised by relatively high apparent resistivity (typically >75 Ωm). The soils between 0.5–1.5 m bgl were therefore inferred as the unsaturated zone within the stratum. Below this, between 1.5–3.0 m bgl, the typical apparent resistivity was lower between 18 and 65 Ωm (typically <45 Ωm) and gradually decreasing with depth. The soil between 1.5–3.0 m bgl was interpreted as the partially saturated and upper-saturated zone of the water level. Further down, the apparent resistivity decreased exponentially below depths of around 2.5–3.75 m bgl with the characteristic electrical resistance being 4–5× smaller in the lower saturated zone than the upper saturated zone.
The apparent resistivities of a representative coastal survey site (MM02) and a representative inland site (MM23) are shown in Fig. 4c,d respectively. The coastal MM02 has apparent resistivity values of 18–22 Ωm, 5.4–6.5 Ωm, and 2.8–4 Ωm at depths of 4, 8, and 12 m bgl, respectively, whilst the inland MM23 indicated apparent resistivity values of 22–25 Ωm, 6.25–8.5 Ωm, 3.5–5.25 Ωm, respectively.
ERT inferred winter groundwater
The inferred water level ranged from –1.65–2.10 m msl. The deepest water level was found around 18 km inland at MM23, whilst the shallowest value was observed around 7 km inland adjacent to the River Nene at MM13. The mean depth of the winter water level was 0.52 ± 0.91 m msl.
The inferred freshwater–saline interface ranged from –3.65–0.73 m msl. The deepest freshwater–saline interface was found at MM23, whilst the shallowest value was located around 1 km inland at the coastal site MM01. The mean depth of the winter freshwater–saline interface was–1.44 ± 1.12 m msl.
The freshwater lens thickness ranged from 0.63–3.25 m. The deepest value of freshwater was found around 14.5 km inland adjacent to the River Nene at MM19a, whilst the lowest value was found at MM01. The mean freshwater lens thickness in the winter was 1.95 ± 0.67 m.
ERT Inferred Summer Groundwater
The water level ranged from –2.65–1.98 m msl. The deepest water level was found around 11.3 km inland at MM29, whilst the shallowest value was found towards the coast around 2.5 km inland at MM03. The mean depth of the summer water level was 0.25 ± 1.17 m msl.
The freshwater–saline interface ranged from –4.65–0.78 m msl. The deepest freshwater–saline interface was located around 18 km inland adjacent the River Wellend at MM25, whilst the shallowest value was found towards the coast at MM03. The mean depth of the summer freshwater–saline interface was –1.55 ± 1.40 m msl.
The freshwater lens thickness ranged from 0.75–3.13 m. The deepest value of freshwater was found at MM23, whilst the shallowest value was located at MM29. The mean freshwater lens thickness in the summer was 1.80 ± 0.59 m.
Winter Groundwater Geostatistical Results
The variograms and a description of the variance are provided in section D of ESM1; however, for the winter, the water level spherical model was fitted with a nugget of 0.04, a sill of 0.86, and a range of 4,070. The freshwater–saline interface fitted the Gaussian model with a nugget of 0.45, a sill of 1.71, and a range of 8,040, whereas the variogram for the winter freshwater lens thickness fitted the Gaussian model with a nugget of 0.00, a sill of 0.31, and a range of 2,790.
The water level ranged from –1.52–2.02 m msl (Fig. 5a). The deepest water level was found at MM23, whilst the shallowest was located at MM13. The mean winter water level was 0.58 ± 0.37 m msl. The error variance ranged from 0.09–0.95 m and had a mean of 0.79 ± 0.29 (see section E of ESM1 for variance error maps).
Inferred water level (m msl) for the a winter and d summer season. Inferred freshwater saline interface (m msl) in b February 2021 and e August 2021. Freshwater lens thickness (m) in c February 2021 and f August 2021. The white-shaded area represents an area containing no data points. Variance maps are provided in ESM1
The freshwater–saline interface ranged from –3.12–0.64 m msl (Fig. 5b). The deepest freshwater–saline interface was located around 3 km south of MM23, whilst the shallowest value was found at the coastline around 2 km northeast of MM02. The mean winter freshwater–saline interface depth was –1.70 ± 0.82 m msl and follows a relatively consistent spatial distribution becoming deeper the further southwest (inland) the groundwater is located. The error variance ranged from 0.54–2.55 m and had a mean of 1.01 ± 0.54 m.
The freshwater lens thickness ranged from 1.04–2.92 m (Fig. 5c). The freshwater lens was located 0.1 km east of MM19a, whilst the thinnest freshwater lens was located at the coast 0.5 km northwest of MM01. The mean freshwater lens thickness in the winter was 1.95 ± 0.27 m.
Summer Groundwater Geostatistical Results
The variogram for the summer water level was fitted with the exponential model with a nugget of 0.48, a sill of 3.87, and a range of 35,400. The summer freshwater–saline interface fitted the exponential model with a nugget of 0.73, a sill of 5.86, and a range of 61,700. The freshwater lens thickness was fitted with a Gaussian model with a nugget of 0.14, a sill of 0.26, and a range of 2,820.
The water level ranged from –1.44–1.30 m msl (Fig. 5d). The deepest water level was found at MM29, whilst the shallowest was located at the coast around 1 km north of MM01. The mean summer water level was 0.01 ± 0.72 m msl. The error variance had a range of 0.65–2.15 m and a mean of 1.03 ± 0.29 m.
The freshwater–saline interface ranged from –3.75–0.14 m msl (Fig. 5e). The deepest freshwater–saline interface was located at MM25, whilst the shallowest was found at the coast around 2.5 km north-east of MM02. The mean summer freshwater–saline interface depth was –2.00 ± 1.02 m msl. Similar to the winter study, the freshwater–saline interface follows a relatively consistent spatial distribution becoming deeper the further inland the groundwater in located. The error variance ranged from 0.94–2.38 and had a mean of 1.29 ± 0.28.
The freshwater lens thickness ranged from 0.69–3.13 m (Fig. 5f). The thickest freshwater lens was located at MM23, whilst the thinnest values were found around 0.6 km south of MM29. The mean freshwater lens thickness in the summer was 1.87 ± 0.42 m.
Seasonal changes
Overall, across the whole study area there was no statistical difference between either the winter and summer water level (p = 0.68, n = 25) or freshwater–saline interface (p = 0.80, n = 25). Of the 25 sites measured in both the summer and winter, 12 sites had higher water levels and 11 had lower levels, whilst 12 sites had a higher saline interface and 12 had a lower saline interface. However, there is a significant positive correlation between the change in water level between summer and winter and the change in saline boundary between summer and winter (Fig. 6a, r = 0.78, p < 0.01, n = 25). Two outliers for this were MM19 and M23 both of which are two of the most inland sites.
It was only amongst the near coastal sites from MM01 to MM11 which are mostly <10 km from the shore that there was a significant rising in the saline interface from winter to summer. This was an average decrease of 30 cm between the seasons (p = 0.04, n = 11) no corresponding change was observed in the water level (p = 0.20, n = 11).
ERT Validation
The statistical analysis suggests that the inferred ERT provide a reliable representation of the groundwater level in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area (Fig. 6). The lack of a fit test shows a high relationship between the inferred and measured water levels (p < 0.001). Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the inferred and measured water level was significant (r = 0.96, p < 0.001, n = 10, Fig. 5b), while the RMSE between the inferred and measured water level was 0.69 (n = 10).
Cross validation was used to ensure error in the kriging data was as small as possible. The most robust prediction (kriging) models have mean errors (ME) that should be 0, the RMSE should be as small as possible (the autokrige function provided this, fitting each variogram to the best fitting model) and the root mean square standardized (RMSS) should be close to 1 (Adhikary et al. 2014). Results from the cross validation (Table 1) show that the ME is extremely low making it almost negligible, the RMSE ranged from 0.60 to 1.42 across all kriging predictions, and all RMSS values are close to 1, suggesting satisfactory robustness of the kriging predictions reported in this study.
Discussion
Potential Influence of Stratigraphy on Salinisation
The stratigraphic survey undertaken by this study (Fig. 2) of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area suggests that direct groundwater recharge is most likely to be restricted to the coastal system and extends southwards adjacent to the River Nene towards Long Sutton. This is due to a sand outcrop in this region which is characteristic of an unconfined aquifer (Domenico and Schwartz 1997). The central region of the study area consisting of a silt outcrop may act as a semiconfining layer. A confining clay cap is located in the north-westerly region and extends along the length of the River Wellend. Theoretically, this should provide an impermeable confining layer (aquitard) which typically has a lower hydraulic conductivity than the silt and sand outcrops (Domenico and Schwartz 1997).
In the coastal areas of The North Sea region the flushing of salts from soil is primarily driven by rainfall, and the rate of salt flushing is higher in more permeable soils (Christensen 2022). Therefore, depending on the length of seawater inundation the well-drained sandy soils in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area may also be able to recover back to preinundation conditions in 2 years significantly reducing the crop yield loss and the financial cost of seawater inundation (Gould et al. 2020).
However, in a soil with low permeability such as the clay cap present in this study area, the vertical movement of saline water after a flood event can be significantly slower. It may take up to 7 years for potentially poorly drained soils located in the region of the confined clay cap to recover from a seawater flood event significantly increasing the financial loss to growers in this region (Gould et al. 2020). In a comparable aquifer in the Netherlands remediation of sodium polluted water through flushing is considered to take up to 40 years (Appelo and Postma 2005).
The flat topography of the South Holland-Holbeach marsh area coupled with the low infiltration rate of the clay cap and the agricultural land use type also makes this area high risk to sodification (Tomaz et al. 2020). This may lead to the structural decline of soil and thus force a change in land management or permanent abandonment of agricultural practice in this region (Gould et al. 2020). Therefore, if seawater inundation was to occur beneath a clay cap in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area, both groundwater abstraction and agricultural practice in this region may be unsuitable for multiple years due to salt contamination.
Unconfined coastal regions are the most at risk from groundwater flooding (Upton and Jackson 2011), which may lead to seepage salinisation. Although sandy soils allow good direct recharge, eastern England (shown in Fig. 1), in which the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area is located, receives the lowest amount of rainfall in the UK (Mayes and Wheeler 2013), and it is projected for summers to become drier (Lowe et al. 2018). In a comparable coastal aquifer in the Netherlands, saline seepage has been predicted to occur by the end of the century as a result of the freshwater–saline interface rising towards the surface (Oude Essink et al. 2010). Furthermore, the rate at which the salinisation takes place is accelerated in low-lying drained land due to land subsidence (Pauw et al. 2012). Therefore, the coastal system of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh, which is mainly drained land, may likely be vulnerable to saline seepage when considering the permeably sand outcrop at the surface.
There are, however, caveats to these findings, particularly in the northern area where the clay cap and silt outcrop boundary is present. Here there is a lack of stratigraphic cores and geological data is scarce and, as such, the boundary is poorly constrained.
Fluctuations in Water Level and Freshwater–Saline Interface
The data indicates that for this shallow, low-lying Holocene coastal UK aquifer, there is no statistically significant fluctuation in the groundwater level. In commonly monitored hard rock UK aquifers, this is unusual since summer groundwater typically has lower levels than winter due to the high winter precipitation (Mackay et al. 2015). The high-water level might be sustained by connectivity to the seawater which fluctuates little for the site (British Oceanographic Data Centre 2021). Thus, the relatively constant sea level has the effect of maintaining a constant pressure head in the groundwater (Kuan et al. 2012), particularly since groundwater dynamics at this site are not topographically driven (Werner et al. 2012).
There are, however, significant fluctuations in the saline-boundary: this is probably primarily driven by surface hydrology. The saline boundary lowers from a summer high to a winter low within ca. 10 km of the coast. During the winter months, when the saline boundary was low, other systems including the neighbouring Welland and Nene rivers had water levels classified as ‘extremely high’; however, by the summer, when the saline boundary was high, these systems were classified as ‘below normal’ (Environment Agency 2021c). Therefore, it is likely that winter freshwater is pushing the saline front downwards during these months (Fig. 7); however, to test this hypothesis further, intensive year-round monitoring of the groundwater system would need to be undertaken.
Nevertheless, should the surface water be controlling the saline front within the groundwater system, there would be consequences for this site and other similar systems. This is because, firstly, climate change is projected to induce increasingly unpredictable variations in rainfall (Taylor et al. 2013), and where this increases droughts, then aquifers like this will have a higher saline front than they currently do. Secondly, humans are projected to increase the use of water resources of both ground and surface waters—e.g. damming irrigation, etc. (Haddeland et al. 2014; Vörösmarty et al. 2010)—including at the locality where large reservoirs are planned (Anglian Water 2022). Where this reduces the availability of surface water, this may also lead to a higher saline front by reducing the downward flux of freshwater. For this to be confirmed, further intensive data is required from this site and other similar sites; however, in the UK, most shallow, low-lying alluvial coastal aquifers are not routinely monitored.
Potential for Freshwater Abstraction
Changes in weather patterns and rising sea levels are putting pressures on global water supplies for agriculture and irrigation, and eastern England is no different. Shallow unconfined groundwater systems have historically not been considered suitable for such irrigation due to an insufficient volume of freshwater availability to support groundwater abstractions. Anecdotally, growers in the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area have typically viewed the groundwater salinity levels as being too high for effective agricultural irrigation. However, there has been increased interest in alternative freshwater sources not least because of the extra 284 million litres of water per day that will be required for agriculture by 2050 (Environment Agency 2020a). As a result, a Holbeach Marsh Abstraction Licensing Strategy has been produced with the possibility for groundwater abstraction through the installation of shallow catch-pits (Environment Agency 2020b).
The results show that up to 3.25 m of freshwater may exist in some, particularly inland, locations where the aquifer is confined. Combined with recent developments in saline farming (Gould et al. 2022), this indicates that this shallow system, and others of similar characteristics around the world, could potentially be utilised as and when a groundwater resource is required. This should be investigated further as a partial solution to the area’s water needs; however, before widespread exploration and extraction takes place, a greater understanding of both the chemistry and hydrogeological dynamics must be gained. Understanding the hydrogeological dynamics is particularly important to understand the affect that pumping could have on the salinisation pathway from the sea.
The unconfined coastal aquifer (Fig. 2) is likely to have most vulnerability to saline upwelling through the permeable sand. In the future there may be increased influence from tidal forcing in The Wash that may potentially increase the amount of seawater intrusion, increasing the vulnerability to saline upwelling in coastal areas if groundwater abstraction was to take place here (Ataie-Ashtiani et al. 1999; Pauw et al. 2012).
Conclusion
This study has produced the first inferred assessment of freshwater–saline interface and groundwater level of the shallow coastal aquifer of the Anglian Fens, UK, and it is coupled to an interpretation of the historical BGS stratigraphic core records enabling the construction of a stratigraphic map of the South Holland-Holbeach Marsh area. This reveals that the aquifer is unconfined at the coast as a result of the sand outcrop but in the north of the study area and adjacent to the River Wellend, a clay cap is present resulting in the aquifer being confined. In the central region, the shallow aquifer is likely to be semiconfined due to the silt outcrop present. The ERT results from this study indicate the depth of the water level and freshwater–saline interface are very shallow. During both winter and summer seasons, the inferred freshwater–saline interface was closest to the surface near the coast and became deeper the further inland. Only in the coastal region, <10 km from the shore, do the tides appear to influence seasonal fluctuations in the depth of the saline water and such fluctuations appear to be in lockstep with the water level. Nevertheless, the work shows that in some locations up to 3.25 m of freshwater may exist beneath the surface, but more investigation of the chemistry and hydrogeology must be done to assess suitability for extraction.
References
Adhikary S, Sharif AA, Saha G, Das S (2014) Geostatistical analysis of groundwater level fluctuations in the shallow aquifer of northwestern Bangladesh. In: ICCESD-2014, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development, Khulna, Bangladesh, February 2014
Águila JF, McDonnell MC, Flynn R, Hamill GA, Ruffell A, Benner EM, Etsias G, Donohue S (2022) Characterizing groundwater salinity patterns in a coastal sand aquifer at Magilligan Northern Ireland using geophysical and geotechnical methods. Environ Earth Sci 81(8):231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10357-1
Aladejana JA, Kalin RM, Sentenac P, Hassan I (2020) Hydrostratigraphic characterisation of shallow coastal aquifers of eastern Dahomey Basin S/W Nigeria using integrated hydrogeophysical approach; implication for saltwater intrusion. Geosciences 10(2):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020065
Alexander L, Jones PD (2000) Updated precipitation series for the U.K. and discussion of recent extremes. Atmos Sci Lett 1(2):142–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/asle.2001.0025
Alfarrah N, Walraevens K (2018) Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020143
Allen DJ, Brewerton LJ, Coleby LM, Gibbs BR, Lewis MA, Macdonald AM, Wagstaff SJ, Williams AT (1997). The physical properties of major aquifers in England and Wales. British Geological Survey technical report WD/97/34. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/13137/1/WD97034.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2022
Anglian Water (2022) Investing in two new reservoirs. Https://www.Anglianwater.Co.Uk/Environment/Investing-in-the-Future-of-Water/Two-New-Reservoirs/. Accessed 2 Oct 2022
Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. Balkema, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Volker RE, Lockington DA (1999) Tidal effects on sea water intrusion in unconfined aquifers. J Hydrol 216(1–2):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00275-3
Barker RD (1979) Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies. Geophys J Int 59(1):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1979.tb02555.x
Barker AP, Newton RJ, Bottrell SH, Tellam JH (1998) Processes affecting groundwater chemistry in a zone of saline intrusion into an urban sandstone aquifer. Appl Geochem 13(6):735–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(98)00006-7
BGS (2020) Borehole records. https://Www.Bgs.Ac.Uk/Information-Hub/Borehole-Records/. Accessed 10 Dec 2020
BGS (2021) Groundhog desktop. https://Www.Bgs.Ac.Uk/Technologies/Software/Groundhog/. Accessed 15 Dec 2021
British Oceanographic Data Centre (2021) UK tide gauge network. https://Www.Bodc.Ac.Uk/Data/Hosted_data_systems/Sea_level/Uk_tide_gauge_network/. Accessed 21 Jan 2022
Christensen LS (2022) Dynamics of soil salinity in Denmark. In: Negacz K, Vellinga P, Barrett-Lennard E, Choukr-Allah R, Elzenga T (eds) Future of sustainable agriculture in saline environments, 1st edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003112327
Cooper D, Foster C, Gooday R, Hallett P, Hobbs P, Irvine B, Kirkby M, Morrow K, Ragab R, Rawlins B, Richards M, Smith P, Spurgeon D, Tye A (2010) Modelling the impact of climate change on soils using UK climate projections. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=SP0571_9946_FRP.pdf. Accessed Dec 2022
Dahlin T (2001) The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Comput Geosci 27(9):1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00160-6
Daliakopoulos IN, Tsanis IK, Koutroulis A, Kourgialas NN, Varouchakis AE, Karatzas GP, Ritsema CJ (2016) The threat of soil salinity: a European scale review. Sci Total Environ 573:727–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.08.177
Dawson Q, Kechavarzi C, Leeds-Harrison PB, Burton RGO (2010) Subsidence and degradation of agricultural peatlands in the fenlands of Norfolk, UK. Geoderma 154(3–4):181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2009.09.017
DIVA-GIS (2022a) Ireland: administrative areas. http://www.diva-gis.org/gdata. Accessed 20 Dec 2022
DIVA-GIS (2022b) Isle of Man: administrative areas. http://www.diva-gis.org/gdata. Accessed 20 Dec 2022
Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1997) The origin of porosity and permeability. In: Physical and chemical hydrogeology, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, pp 13–32
Environment Agency (2018) The state of the environment: water resources. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1005590/State_of_the_environment_water_resources_report.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Environment Agency (2020a) Meeting our future water needs: a national framework for water resources. Environment Agency, London
Environment Agency (2020b) Holbeach Marsh abstraction licensing strategy: a strategy to manage water resources sustainably. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/874251/Holbeach-Marsh-abstraction-licensing-strategy.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2021
Environment Agency (2021a) Monthly water situation report: Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire area August 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/water-situation-local-area-reports. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Environment Agency (2021b) Monthly water situation report: Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire area December 2020. Https://Webarchive.Nationalarchives.Gov.Uk/Ukgwa/20210202212012/Https://Www.Gov.Uk/Government/Publications/Water-Situation-Local-Area-Reports. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Environment Agency (2021c) Monthly water situation report: Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire area February 2021. Https://Webarchive.Nationalarchives.Gov.Uk/Ukgwa/20210403042201/Https://Www.Gov.Uk/Government/Publications/Water-Situation-Local-Area-Reports. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Environment Agency (2021d) Monthly water situation report: Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire area January 2021. Https://Webarchive.Nationalarchives.Gov.Uk/Ukgwa/20210301202533/Https://Www.Gov.Uk/Government/Publications/Water-Situation-Local-Area-Reports. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Environment Agency (2021e) Monthly water situation report: Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire area July 2021. Https://Webarchive.Nationalarchives.Gov.Uk/Ukgwa/20210901171604/Https://Www.Gov.Uk/Government/Publications/Water-Situation-Local-Area-Reports. Accessed 5 Jan 2022
Ferguson G, Gleeson T (2012) Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nature Climate Change 2012 2(5):342–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1413
Galazoulas EC, Mertzanides YC, Petalas CP, Evangelos Kargiotis K (2015) Large scale electrical resistivity tomography survey correlated to hydrogeological data for mapping groundwater salinization: a case study from a multilayered coastal aquifer in Rhodope northeastern Greece. Environ Process 2(1):19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0061-y
Gallois RW, Cox BM (1976) The stratigraphy of the lower Kimmeridge clay of eastern England. Proceed Yorkshire Geol 41(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.41.1.13
Gish OH, Rooney WJ (1925) Measurement of resistivity of large masses of undisturbed earth. J Geophys Res 30(4):161–188. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE030i004p00161
Gould I, Wright I, Collison M, Ruto E, Bosworth G, Pearson S (2020) The impact of coastal flooding on agriculture: a case-study of Lincolnshire, United Kingdom. Land Degrad Dev 31(12):1545–1559. https://doi.org/10.1002/LDR.3551
Gould I, de Waegemaeker J, Tzemi D, Wright I, Pearson S, Ruto E, Karrasch L, Chritsensen LS, Aronsson H, Eich-Greatorex S, Bosworth G, Vellinga P (2022) Salinisation threats to agriculture across the North Sea region. In: Negacz K, Vellinga P, Barrett-Lennard E, Choukr-Allah R, Elzenga T (eds) Future of sustainable agriculture in saline environments, 1st edn. CRC, pp 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003112327
Haddeland I, Heinke J, Biemans H, Eisner S, Flörke M, Hanasaki N, Konzmann M, Ludwig F, Masaki Y, Schewe J, Stacke T, Tessler ZD, Wada Y, Wisser D (2014) Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(9):3251–3256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110
Hermans T, Paepen M (2020) Combined inversion of land and marine electrical resistivity tomography for submarine groundwater discharge and saltwater intrusion characterization. Geophys Res Lett 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085877
Hiemstra P (2015) Package ‘automap’. Automatic interpolation package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/automap/automap.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Hiscock KM, Dennis PF, Saynor PR, Thomas MO (1996) Hydrochemical and stable isotope evidence for the extent and nature of the effective chalk aquifer of North Norfolk, UK. J Hydrol 180(1–4):79–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02895-1
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015: international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. https://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Kendon M, McCarthy M, Jevrejeva S, Matthews A, Sparks T, Garforth J (2021) State of the UK climate 2020. Int J Climatol 41(S2):1–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7285
Klassen J, Allen DM (2017) Assessing the risk of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 551:730–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.044
Knox J, Daccache A, Weatherhead K (2013) Assessment of the impacts of climate change and changes in land use on future water requirement and availability for farming, and opportunities for adaptation. Phase I final report, FFG1129. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=11705_DefraFFG1129_Cranfield_PhaseIFinal_05.12.13.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021
Knox J, Kay M, Holman I, Hess T (2020) Irrigation water strategy for UK agriculture and horticulture. https://www.nfuonline.com/archive?treeid=141830. Accessed 12 July 2021
Koefoed O (1979) Resistivity sounding on an earth model containing transition layers with linear change of resistivity with depth*. Geophys Prospect 27(4):862–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb01003.x
Kuan WK, Jin G, Xin P, Robinson C, Gibbes B, Li L (2012) Tidal influence on seawater intrusion in unconfined coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010678
Loke, M. H. (1999). Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys. https://pages.mtu.edu/~ctyoung/LOKENOTE.PDF. Accessed Dec 2022
Lowe JA, Bernie D, Bett P, Bricheno L, Brown S, et al (2018) UKCP18 Science Overview report. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Overview-report.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2021
Mackay JD, Jackson CR, Brookshaw A, Scaife AA, Cook J, Ward RS (2015) Seasonal forecasting of groundwater levels in principal aquifers of the United Kingdom. J Hydrol 530:815–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2015.10.018
MAFF (1988) Agricultural land classification of England and Wales: revised guidelines and criteria for grading the quality of agricultural land. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20130402151656/http:/archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/landmanage/land-use/documents/alc-guidelines-1988.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Mao X, Enot P, Barry DA, Li L, Binley A, Jeng D-S (2006) Tidal influence on behaviour of a coastal aquifer adjacent to a low-relief estuary. J Hydrol 327(1–2):110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.030
Mayes J, Wheeler D (2013) Regional weather and climates of the British Isles, part 1: introduction. Weather 68(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2041
Met Office (2021) UK climate averages. Https://Www.Metoffice.Gov.Uk/Research/Climate/Maps-and-Data/Uk-Climate-Averages/U12hg1nxt. Accessed 29 Nov 2021
Natural England (2013) NCA profile: 46. The Fens (NE424). http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6229624?category=587130. Accessed 20 Feb 2021
Natural England (2021) National character areas (England). Https://Data.Gov.Uk/Dataset/21104eeb-4a53-4e41-8ada-D2d442e416e0/National-Character-Areas-England. Accessed 2 Apr 2021
NFU (2008) Why farming matters in The Fens. https://www.nfuonline.com/archive?treeid=23991#:~:text=Overall%2089%25%20of%20farmland%20in,ornamental%20plants%20such%20as%20daffodils. Accessed 20 Feb 2021
NFU (2019) Delivering for Britain: food and farming in The Fens. https://www.nfuonline.com/archive?treeid=117727. Accessed 20 Feb 2021
Ordnance Survey (2021) OS Terrain® 50. Https://Osdatahub.Os.Uk/Downloads/Open/Terrain50. Accessed 7 Dec 2021
Oude Essink GHP, van Baaren ES, de Louw PGB (2010) Effects of climate change on coastal groundwater systems: a modeling study in the Netherlands. Water Resour Res 46(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008719
Parker DE, Legg TP, Folland CK (1992) A new daily Central England temperature series 1772–1991. Int J Climatol 12(4):317–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370120402
Pauw P, de Louw PGB, Essink GHPO (2012) Groundwater salinisation in the Wadden Sea area of the Netherlands: quantifying the effects of climate change, sea-level rise and anthropogenic interferences, Netherlands. J Geosci - Geol Mijnbouw 91(3):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600000500
Pauw PS, Groen J, MMA G, van der Made KJ, Stuyfzand PJ, VEA P (2017) Groundwater salinity patterns along the coast of the Western Netherlands and the application of cone penetration tests. J Hydrol:551756–551767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.021
Rey D, Holman IP, Daccache A, Morris J, Weatherhead EK, Knox JW (2016) Modelling and mapping the economic value of supplemental irrigation in a humid climate. Agric Water Manag 17313–17322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.017
Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, London
Ruto E, Domna T, Gould I, Bosworth G (2022) Economic impact of soil salinization and the potential for saline agriculture. In: Negacz K, Vellinga P, Barrett-Lennard E, Choukr-Allah R, Elzenga T (eds) Future of sustainable agriculture in saline environments, 1st edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003112327
Spencer T, Brooks SM, Evans BR, Tempest JA, Möller I (2015) Southern north sea storm surge event of 5 December 2013: water levels, waves and coastal impacts. Earth Sci Rev 146:120–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2015.04.002
Sturt F (2006) Local knowledge is required: a rhythm analytical approach to the late Mesolithic and early Neolithic of the east Anglian Fenland, UK. J Maritime Archaeol 1(2):119–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-006-9006-y
Szalai S, Novák A, Szarka L (2009) Depth of investigation and vertical resolution of surface geoelectric arrays. J Environ Eng Geophys 14(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG14.1.15
Taylor RG, Scanlon B, Döll P, Rodell M, van Beek R, Wada Y, Longuevergne L, Leblanc M, Famiglietti JS, Edmunds M, Konikow L, Green TR, Chen J, Taniguchi M, Bierkens MFP, MacDonald A, Fan Y, Maxwell RM, Yechieli Y, et al (2013) Ground water and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):322–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744
Tellam JH, Lloyd JW, Walters M (1986) The morphology of a saline groundwater body: its investigation, description and possible explanation. J Hydrol 83(1–2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90179-4
Thorne C (2014) Geographies of UK flooding in 2013/4. Geogr J 180(4):297–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/GEOJ.12122
Tomaz A, Palma P, Fialho S, Lima A, Alvarenga P, Potes M, Costa MJ, Salgado R (2020) Risk assessment of irrigation-related soil salinization and sodification in Mediterranean areas. Water 12(12):3569. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123569
Tsourlos P, Ogilvy R, Papazachos C, Meldrum P (2011) Measurement and inversion schemes for single borehole-to-surface electrical resistivity tomography surveys. J Geophys Eng 8(4):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/8/4/001
UK Data Service (2022a) Boundary data: Gb_dt_2010_05. https://borders.ukdataservice.ac.uk/bds.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2022
UK Data Service (2022b) Boundary data: infuse_cnty_lyr_2011. https://borders.ukdataservice.ac.uk/bds.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2022
Upton KA, Jackson CR (2011) Simulation of the spatio-temporal extent of groundwater flooding using statistical methods of hydrograph classification and lumped parameter models. Hydrol Process 25(12):1949–1963. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7951
Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440
Vousdoukas MI, Mentaschi L, Voukouvalas E, Verlaan M, Feyen L (2017) Extreme sea levels on the rise along Europe’s coasts. Earth’s Future 5(3):304–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000505
Water Resources East. (2021). Future fens: integrated adaption. https://wre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Future-Fens-Integrated-Adaptation-manifesto_November-2021.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2021
Weatherhead K, Knox J, Daccache A, Morris J, Kay M, Groves S, Hulin A (2014) Water for agriculture: collaborative approaches and on-farm storage. Final report FFG1112. https://www.fensforthefuture.org.uk/admin/resources/water-for-agriculture-final-report-march-2014.pdf. Accessed Dec 2022
Werner AD, Lockington DA (2006) Tidal impacts on riparian salinities near estuaries. J Hydrol 328(3–4):511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.011
Werner AD, Ward JD, Morgan LK, Simmons CT, Robinson NI, Teubner MD (2012) Vulnerability indicators of sea water intrusion. Ground Water 50(1):48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00817.x
Whitmore AP (1991) A method for assessing the goodness of computer simulation of soil processes. J Soil Sci 42(2):289–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00410.x
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to the landowners in the Holbeach Marsh Fens for their permissions to conduct our survey on their land. We thank Gertruda Zieniute, Harry Roberts, Michaela Loria, and Shannon Kelly (all University of Lincoln) for their assistance with the ERT Fieldwork campaigns. We thank Professor Gary Bosworth (now at Northumbria University, UK) for initial conversations on the study.
Funding
This work was supported with funding from the EU Interreg (North Sea) Project SalFar: Saline Farming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moulds, M., Gould, I., Wright, I. et al. Use of electrical resistivity tomography to reveal the shallow freshwater–saline interface in The Fens coastal groundwater, eastern England (UK). Hydrogeol J 31, 335–349 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02586-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02586-2