Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial economic self-organization with periodic and quasiperiodic dynamics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of regions through spatial self-organization is a key issue in spatial economics. The standard approach to the modelling of space in regional science has been to assume that space can be modelled as a one-dimensional system, often locations arrayed on a circle. This paper studies spatial self-organization in an economic geography model defined on a two-dimensional surface, assuming periodic or quasiperiodic dynamics. A discrete time model with discretized locations is applied, motivating a cellular automata approach. Numerical simulations suggest that the number of regions emerging on a two-dimensional model is different than that on a one-dimensional model, keeping other parameters the same. The spatial distribution of economic activity on a two-dimensional space (torus) appears less stable than one on a circle. A two-dimensional economic model can be extended to capture nonuniformity in the landscape by using a quasiperiodic dynamical system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dean R, Leahy W, McKee D (eds) (1970) Spatial economic theory. The Free Press, MacMillan, New York

  2. Frankenhauser P, Peters D, Caruso G, Cavailhes J, Thomas I, Vuidel G (2008) Surprising similarities between DBM Models and an economic geography model of city growth. Presentation at ERSA 2008, Liverpool

  3. Hale J, Kocak H (1991) Dynamics and bifurcations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heikkinen T (2008) Spatial self-organization on a two-dimensional surface. In Proc. ERSA 2008, Liverpool, UK

  5. Hotelling H (1929) The stability of competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krugman P (1996) The self-organizing economy. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krugman P, Venables A (1995) The seamless world: a spatial model of international specialization. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 5220

  8. Marlow W (1978) Mathematics for operations research. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miyata Y, Nonaka H (2008) Urban economic model over two-dimensional continuous space – Numerical experiment. Presentation at ERSA 2008, Liverpool, UK (USB-proceedings)

  10. Muench T (1988) Quantum agglomeration formation during growth in a combined economic/gravity model. J Urban Econ 23:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolis G, Prigonine I (1998) Exporing complexity: an introduction. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

  12. Pinto N, Antunes A (2007) Modeling and urban studies: An introduction. Archit City Environ 2(4):471–485

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson J, Stewart H (1994) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Varian H (1984) Microeconomic analysis. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolfram S (1994) Cellular automata and complexity. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiina Heikkinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heikkinen, T. Spatial economic self-organization with periodic and quasiperiodic dynamics . Jahrb Regionalwiss 29, 161–183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-009-0035-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-009-0035-5

Keywords

Navigation