Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of particle morphology simplification on the simulation of granular material behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphology is an important grain scale property that substantially influences the macroscopic behavior of granular materials. Particle-based methods such as discrete element method are suitable to study the morphology effect because the particle geometry can be systematically controlled. However, coupling realistic particle morphology with simulation involves significant computational costs. Therefore, considerably simplified particle morphology has been typically adopted in the particle-based simulations to keep the computational costs manageable. This paper aims to systematically address how modeling error results from the morphology simplification and investigates how the modeled fidelity of particle morphology influences the simulated granular material behavior. To this end, a spectrum of particle morphology is developed by gradually simplifying a polyhedral particle model that represents a realistic particle morphology. The modeled fidelity is then quantified in term of Shape Factor and Angularity Factor to characterize the global form and the local angularity of the particle morphology. A set of 3D printed particles is developed from the numerical particle models and used in laboratory testing for systematic parametric study. A series of triaxial compression tests is performed on the synthetic specimens with the 3D printed particles. The result indicates the relative importance of high-fidelity modeling of (1) local angularity under low-confining pressure and (2) global form under high-confining pressure. This study also demonstrates the potential of leveraging 3D printed synthetic particles to study the morphology-dependent mechanical behavior of granular materials.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho, G.-C., Dodds, J., Santamarina, J.C.: Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132, 591–602 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Payan, M., Senetakis, K., Khoshghalb, A., Khalili, N.: Effect of gradation and particle shape on small-strain Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of sands. Int. J. Geomech. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, C., Suh, H.S., Yoon, B., Yun, T.S.: Particle shape effect on thermal conductivity and shear wave velocity in sands. Acta Geotech. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0524-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, C.S., Tanyu, B.F., Yavuz, A.B.: Effect of particle shape on durability and performance of unbound aggregate base. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29, 04016221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin, H., Santamarina, J.C.: Role of particle angularity on the mechanical behavior of granular mixtures. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139, 353–355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000768

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stark, N., Hay, A.E., Cheel, R., Lake, C.B.: The impact of particle shape on the angle of internal friction and the implications for sediment dynamics at a steep, mixed sand–gravel beach. Earth Surf. Dyn. 2, 469–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-469-2014

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ericson, C.: Real-Time Collision Detection. CRC Press (2005). ISBN: 9781558607323. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781558607323/real-timecollision-detection

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nezami, E.G., Hashash Y, M.A., Zhao, D., Ghaboussi, J.: Shortest link method for contact detection in discrete element method. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 30, 783–801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.500

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, S.J., Hashash, Y.M.A., Nezami, E.G.: Simulation of triaxial compression tests with polyhedral discrete elements. Comput. Geotech. 43, 92–100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smeets, B., Odenthal, T., Vanmaercke, S., Ramon, H.: Polygon-based contact description for modeling arbitrary polyhedra in the Discrete Element Method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 290, 277–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.004

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert, E.G., Johnson, D.W., Keerthi, S.S.: Fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4, 193–203 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/56.2083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferellec, J.-F., McDowell, G.R.: A simple method to create complex particle shapes for DEM. Geomech. Geoengin. 3, 211–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020802253992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Sullivan, C.: Particle-based discrete element modeling: geomechanics perspective. Int. J. Geomech. 11, 449–464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mollon, G., Zhao, J.: 3D generation of realistic granular samples based on random fields theory and Fourier shape descriptors. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 279, 46–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.06.022

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng, T.: Discrete element method simulations of the critical state of a granular material. Int. J. Geomech. 9, 209–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:5(209)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, S., Zhou, X., Liu, W.: Discrete element simulations of direct shear tests with particle angularity effect. Granul. Matter 17, 793–806 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-015-0593-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azéma, E., Estrada, N., Radjaï, F.: Nonlinear effects of particle shape angularity in sheared granular media. Phys. Rev. E 86, 1–15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Azema, E., Preechawuttipong, I., Radjai, F.: Binary mixtures of disks and elongated particles: texture and mechanical properties. Phys. Rev. E 94, 042901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042901

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Höhner, D., Wirtz, S., Scherer, V.: A study on the influence of particle shape on the mechanical interactions of granular media in a hopper using the Discrete Element Method. Powder Technol. 278, 286–305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Latham, J.-P., Munjiza, A., Garcia, X., Xiang, J., Guises, R.: Three-dimensional particle shape acquisition and use of shape library for DEM and FEM/DEM simulation. Miner. Eng. 21, 797–805 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, B., Regueiro, R., Druckrey, A., Alshibli, K.: Construction of poly-ellipsoidal grain shapes from SMT imaging on sand, and the development of a new DEM contact detection algorithm. Eng. Comput. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/ec-01-2017-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim, K.: Discrete modeling of granular media: a NURBS-based approach (2015). https://thesis.library.caltech.edu/8734/. Accessed 2 Dec 2019

  23. Jerves, A.X., Kawamoto, R.Y., Andrade, J.E.: Effects of grain morphology on critical state: a computational analysis. Acta Geotech. 11, 493–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0422-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, J., Hryciw, R.D.: Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry. Géotechnique 65, 494–506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alshibli, K.A., Druckrey, A.M., Al-Raoush, R.I., Weiskittel, T., Lavrik, N.V.: Quantifying morphology of sands using 3D imaging. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27, 04014275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., Mesri, G.: Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Wiley, Hoboken (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sukumaran, B., Ashmawy, A.K.: Quantitative characterisation of the geometry of discrete particles. Géotechnique 51, 619–627 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.7.619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wadell, H.: Sphericity and roundness of rock particles. J. Geol. 41, 310–331 (1933)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tutumluer, E., Rao, C., Stefanski, J.A.: Video Image Analysis of Aggregates. Urbana, Illinois (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Rousan, T., Masad, E., Myers, L., Speigelman, C.: New methodology for shape classification of aggregates. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1913, 11–23 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1913-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hryciw, R.D., Zheng, J., Ohm, H.-S., Li, J.: Innovations in optical geocharacterization. In: Geo-congress 2014 Keynote Lectures: Geo-characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, pp. 97–116 (2014)

  32. Wang, L., Sun, W., Tutumluer, E., Druta, C.: Evaluation of aggregate imaging techniques for quantification of morphological characteristics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2335, 39–49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3141/2335-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, S., Landis, E.N., Keane, D.T.: X-ray microtomographic studies of pore structure and permeability in Portland cement concrete. Mater. Struct. 39, 611–620 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9099-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 3D Hubs: Additive manufacturing technologies infographic. https://www.3dhubs.com/what-is-3dprinting#technologies/sites/all/themes/hubs3d/images/landingpage/3d-101/technologies/additive-manufacturing-infographic. Accessed 2 Dec 2019

  35. Hull, C.W.: US4575330 A: apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography (1984). https://www.google.com/patents/US4575330. Accessed 2 Dec 2019

  36. Redwood, B., Schöffer, F., Garret, B.: The 3D Printing Handbook: Technologies, Design and Applications (2017). ISBN: 9789082748505. Available at: https://www.3dhubs.com/3d-printing-handbook/

  37. Formlabs: Formlabs Design Guide (2016) Available at: https://archive-media.formlabs.com/upload/formlabs-design-guide.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2017

  38. Formlabs: Clear—photopolymer resin for form 1+ (2014). http://formlabs.com/media/upload/Clear-DataSheet.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2019

  39. Zguris, Z.: How Mechanical Properties of Stereolithography 3D Prints are Affected by UV Curing. Formlabs White Paper (2016). Available at: https://formlabs.com/media/upload/How-Mechanical-Properties-of-SLA-3D-Prints-Are-Affected-by-UV-Curing.pdf

  40. ASTM: ASTM D638—standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International 08.01 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1520/d0638-14

  41. Watters, M.P., Bernhardt, M.L.: Curing parameters to improve the mechanical properties of stereolithographic printed specimens. Rapid Prototyp. J. 24, 46–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2016-0180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM: ASTM D695—standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. ASTM International 08.01 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1520/d0695-15

  43. Jacobs, S.A.: Insitu measurement of Florida limestone modulus and strength properties. Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville. Thesis (2003)

  44. Zhang, B., Lee, S.J., Qian, Y., Tutumluer, E., Bhattacharya, S.: A smartphone-based image analysis technique for ballast aggregates. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2016, pp. 623–630. American Society of Civil Engineers (2016)

  45. The Blender Foundation: Blender (2019). Available at: www.blender.org. Accessed 2 Dec 2019

  46. Bian, X., Li, W., Qian, Y., Tutumluer, E.: Micromechanical particle interactions in railway ballast through DEM simulations of direct shear tests. Int. J. Geomech. 19, 04019031 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alshibli, K.A., Jarrar, M.F., Druckrey, A.M., Al-Raoush, R.I.: Influence of particle morphology on 3D kinematic behavior and strain localization of sheared sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Alshibli, K.A., Cil, M.B.: Influence of particle morphology on the friction and dilatancy of sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144, 04017118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhao, S., Zhou, X., Liu, W.: Discrete element simulations of direct shear tests with particle angularity effect. Granul. Matter 17, 793–806 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-015-0593-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. ASTM: ASTM D2850-15 standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils. ASTM International (2015)

  51. ASTM: ASTM D7181-11 standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM International (2011). https://doi.org/10.1520/d7181-11

  52. Thornton, C.: Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 50, 43–53 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Matsumura, S., Kobayashi, T., Mizutani, T.: Manufacture of bonded granular soil using X-ray CT scanning and 3D printing. Geotech. Test. J. 40, 20160237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gupta, R., Salager, S., Wang, K., Sun, W.: Open-source support toward validating and falsifying discrete mechanics models using synthetic granular materials—part I: experimental tests with particles manufactured by a 3D printer. Acta Geotech. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0703-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hanaor, D.A.H., Gan, Y., Revay, M., Airey, D.W., Einav, I.: 3D printable geomaterials. Géotechnique 66, 323–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mitchell, J.K., Soga, K.: Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Formlabs: Form 1+ (2014). Available at: http://formlabs.com/. Accessed 29 Aug 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is sponsored in part by Florida International University (FIU) with the new faculty start-up fund provided to the corresponding author. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not represent the opinions of FIU. The authors would like to thank Mr. Edgar Polo for his help with the laboratory triaxial compression tests and Dr. Benjamin Boesl for his help on the tensile test on the 3D printed specimen. The authors would like to extend the appreciation to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments that helped enhance the final quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33174, USA

    Yu Feng Su & Seung Jae Lee

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA

    Beena Sukumaran

Authors
  1. Yu Feng Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seung Jae Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beena Sukumaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Jae Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Y., Lee, S. & Sukumaran, B. Influence of particle morphology simplification on the simulation of granular material behavior. Granular Matter 22, 19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0987-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0987-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation