Skip to main content
Log in

Sand suspension deposition in horizontal low-concentration slurry pipe flows

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detailed observations in a slurry transparent horizontal loop of the sand transport deposition regime, ranging from fully suspended particles to bed motion as a train of dunes, are reported. Deposition, or scouring, is known as a deleterious sand transport regime in view of pipeline erosion. The two velocity thresholds limiting the deposition regime: the critical sand-carrying velocity threshold or deposition threshold below which particles begin to deposit, and the minimum conveying velocity threshold, below which particles cannot be suspended anymore and self-organize into dunes, span about 20 % of the bulk velocity such that detection of the beginning of the deposition provides a margin of safety before accumulation risks. Observed moving, snaking structures are likely to be the actors of the reckoned erosion on pipelines bottom in this scouring regime. From a digital treatment of the videos of the deposited particles, the deposition regime presents a salient characteristic: a consistent increase in the number of detected entities as the bulk velocity decreases down to a brutal trend inversion once all particles are eventually deposited and self-organise and hide into dunes. The findings are, in a first approximation, independent of the sand size and concentration, for the cases considered, and provide a basis for the design of monitoring methods for systematic detection of the deposition regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-lababidi, S., Yan, W., Yeung, H., Sugarman, P., Fairhurst, C.P.: Sand transport characteristics in water and two-phase air/water flows in pipelines. In: North American Conference on Multiphase Technology, Banff, Canada (2008)

  2. Avent, M. and Leggoe, J.: Investigation into sand deposition and transportation in multiphase pipelines—phase 2. In: Cooperative Education for Enterprise Development Seminar Proceeedings, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, pp. 25–30 (2012)

  3. Capecelatro, J., Desjardins, O.: Eulerian–Lagrangian modeling of turbulent liquid–solid slurries in horizontal pipes. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 55, 64–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camenen, B.: Simple and general formula for the settling velocity of particles. J. Hydraul. Eng. 133(2), 229–233 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Danielson, T.J.: Sand transport modeling in multiphase pipelines. In: Offshore Technology Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, USA, p. 11 (2007)

  6. Davies, J.T.: Calculation of critical velocities to maintain solids in suspension in horizontal pipes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 42(7), 1667–1670 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doron, P., Barnea, D.: Pressure drop and limit deposit velocity for solid–liquid flow in pipes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 50(10), 1595–1604 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doron, P., Granica, D., Barnea, D.: Slurry flow in horizontal pipes—experimental and modeling. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 13(4), 535–547 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillies, R.G., Shook, C.A.: Concentration distributions of sand slurries in horizontal pipe flow. Part. Sci. Technol. 12(1), 45–69 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillies, R.G., Shook, C.A.: Modelling high concentration settling slurry flows. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 78(4), 709–716 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillies, R.G., McKibben, M.J., Shook, C.A.: Pipeline flow of gas, liquid and sand mixtures at low velocities. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 36(9), 36–42 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, vol. 3. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E., Eddins, S.L.: Digital Image Processing Using Matlab. Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matousek, V.: Pressure drops and flow patterns in sand-mixture pipes. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26(6/7), 693–702 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Norris, J.A.: Critical deposit velocity correlations for a turbulent heterogeneous slurry. Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1980)

  16. Oroskar, A.R., Turian, R.M.: The critical velocity in pipeline flow slurries. AIChe J. 26(4), 550–558 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oudeman, P.: Sand transport and deposition in horizontal multiphase trunklines of subsea satellite developments. SPE Prod. Facil. 8(4), 237–241 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pechenkin, M.V.: Experimental studies of flows with high solid particle concentrations. In: Thirteenth Congress International on Association Hydraulic Research, Kyoto, p. 8 (1969)

  19. Pullum, L. and Graham, L.J.W.: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to probe complex hybrid suspension flows. In: Tenth International Conference on Transport Sedimentation Solid Part, Wroclaw, pp. 421–433 (2000)

  20. Robinson, M.P. and Graf, W.H.: Critical deposit velocities for low-concentration sand–water mixtures. In: ASCE Natural Water Research Engineering Meeting, American Society of Civil Engineers, Atlanta, p. 30 (1972)

  21. Salama, M.M.: Sand production management. In: Offshore Technology Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, USA, pp. 743–751 (1998)

  22. Shook, C.A., Gillies, R.G., Kristoff, B.J. and Small, M.H.: Sand transport mechanism in horizontal wells. In: Technical Meeting/Petroleum Conference on South Saskatchewan Section, Petroleum Society of CIM and CANMET, Regina, Canada, p. 9 (1992)

  23. Sommerfeld, M.: Private communication, vol. 9. In: International Conference on CFD Minerals Process Industries, 10–12 December 2012, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (2012)

  24. Spillane, C. and Leggoe, J.: Investigation into sand deposition and transportation in multiphase pipelines. In: Co-operative Education of Enterprise Development, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, pp. 13–18 (2011)

  25. Thomas, A.D.: Predicting the deposit velocity for horizontal turbulent pipe flow of slurries. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 5(2), 113–129 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to the CSIRO technical staff for their assistance in conducting the experiments. The contribution of Dr. Robert Stewart in performing initial image analysis is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by CSIRO appropriation funding from the Minerals Down Under Flagship. Journal editorial reviewers as well as internal CSIRO reviewers are acknowledged for their contribution to the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. R. Boulanger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (divx 19764 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (divx 38822 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

The acquisition was facilitated by an optical set-up designed such that the deposited particles were enhanced in the picture, compared to the suspended ones, by putting the focal plane of the camera at the pipe floor level (Sect. 4). The pictures were then digitally sharpened. The particles boundaries were identified from morphological processing followed by segmentation typical of blob detection. Particles were directly counted from the blobs found. It must be remarked that the images were obtained as frames of videos of standard quality and the definition of the particles border was under-resolved such that incomplete blob frontiers or clumps were identified. The counting of blobs therefore did not follow exactly quantitatively the number of deposited particles captured within the camera window but this did not damage the identification of the robust trends associated with the types of transport regimes. Frame extraction from the videos was performed at a specific constant rate. It was checked that this rate was high enough to correctly follow the evolution in the number of deposited particles sweeping the camera window. Processing of a frame took 190-200 ms for the resolution used (640x480) on a standard desktop I7 CPU, 4GB RAM workstation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boulanger, J.A.R., Wong, C.Y. Sand suspension deposition in horizontal low-concentration slurry pipe flows. Granular Matter 18, 15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0616-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0616-2

Keywords

Navigation