Skip to main content
Log in

DEM simulations of the small strain stiffness of granular soils: effect of stress ratio

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DEM (discrete element method) simulations are carried out to evaluate the small strain stiffness (i.e. Young’s modulus and shear modulus) of a granular random packing with focus on the effect of stress ratio (SR). The results show that the Young’s modulus in a given direction generally depends on the stress component in that direction. The Young’s modulus normalized by the related stress component remains nearly constant when SR is less than a threshold value \(SR_\mathrm{th}\). When SR is larger than \(SR_\mathrm{th}\), the normalized Young’s modulus decreases, particularly in the minor principle stress direction. Moreover, the Young’s modulus during unloading is always smaller than the one during loading at the same stress state, which indicates that the microstructure of the specimen has been modified by the historical shearing process. The shear modulus mainly depends on the mean effective stress and shows similar evolution trend as the Young’s modulus. This study finds that the macroscopic stiffness of the specimen is closely related to the evolutions of particle contact number and contact force during shearing. When SR is less than \(SR_\mathrm{th}\), the specimen only adjusts the distribution of contact forces to resist the external load, without any apparent change of contact number. When SR is larger than \(SR_\mathrm{th}\), however, the specimen has to adjust both contact number and contact forces to resist the external load. The study also illustrates that there is a good relationship between the macroscopic stiffness anisotropy and fabric anisotropy, and therefore the stiffness anisotropy may be used as an indicator of fabric anisotropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DEM:

Discrete element method

SR:

Stress ratio

CN:

Coordination number

NCF:

Normal contact force

TC:

Triaxial compression

TE:

Triaxial extension

IC:

Isotropic compression

AC:

Axial compression

AE:

Axial extension

References

  1. Richart, F.E., Hall, J.R., Woods, R.D.: Vibrations of Soils and Foundations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrus, R.D., Stokoe, K.H.I.I.: Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126(1), 1015–1025 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, J., Yan, X.R.: Site response to multi-directional earthquake loading: a practical procedure. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29(4), 710–721 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardin, B.O., Richart, F.E.: Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89(SM1), 39–56 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardin, B.O., Black, W.L.: Sand stiffness under various triaxial stresses. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92(2), 27–42 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tatsuoka, F., Iwasaki, T., Fukushima, S., Sudo, H.: Stress conditions and stress histories affecting shear modulus and damping of sand under cyclic loading. Soils Found. 19(2), 29–43 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roesler, S.K.: Anisotropic shear modulus due to stress anisotropy. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105(7), 871–880 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knox, D.P., Stokoe, K.H.II., Kopperman, S.E.: Effect of state of stress on velocity of low-amplitude shear wave propagation along principle stress directions in dry sand. Geotechnical Engineering report GR-82-23, University of Texas at Austin, Texas (1982)

  9. Yu, P.-J., Richart Jr, F.E.: Stress ratio effects on the shear modulus of dry sands. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 110(3), 331–345 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y.-C., Ishibashi, I., Jenkins, J.T.: Dynamic shear modulus and fabric: part I, depositional and induced anisotropy. Géotechnique 38(1), 25–32 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ezaoui, A., Di Benedetto, H.: Experimental measurements of the global anisotropic elastic behavior of dry Hostun sand during triaxial tests, and the effect of sample preparation. Géotechnique 59(7), 621–635 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellotti, R., Jamiolkowski, M., Lo Presti, D.C.F., O’Neill, D.A.: Anisotropy of small strain stiffness in Ticino sand. Géotechnique 46(1), 115–131 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoque, E., Tatsuoka, F.: Anisotropy in elastic deformation of granular materials. Soils Found. 38(11), 163–179 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwano, R., Jardine, R.J.: On the applicability of cross-anisotropic elasticity to granular materials at very small strains. Géotechnique 52(10), 727–749 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoque, E., Tatsuoka, F.: Effects of stress ratio on small-strain stiffness during triaxial shearing. Géotechnique 54(7), 429–439 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.D.L.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29(1), 47–65 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cundall, P.A., Jenkins, J.T., Ishibashi, I.: Evolution of elastic moduli in a deforming granular assembly. In: Biarez, J., Gourves, R. (eds.) Powders and Grains, pp. 319–322. Balkema, Rotterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dobry, R., Ng, T.T.: Discrete modeling of stress-strain behavior of granular media at small and large strains. Eng. Comput. 9, 129–143 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng, T.T., Petrakis, E.: Small-strain response of random array of spheres using discrete element method. J. Eng. Mech. 122(10), 239–244 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magnanimo, V., La Ragione, L., Jenkins, J.T., Wang, P., Makse, H.A.: Characterizing the shear and bulk moduli of an idealized granular material. Europhys. Lett. 81(3), 34006 (2008)

  21. Wang, Y.H., Mok, C.M.B.: Mechanisms of small-strain shear-modulus anisotropy in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134(10), 1516–1530 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Itasca: Particle flow code (\(\text{ PFC }^{\rm 2D})\) manual, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minn. (2003)

  23. O’Sullivan, C., Bray, J.D., Riemer, M.F.: Influence of particle shape and surface friction variability on response of rod-shaped particulate media. J. Eng. Mech. 128(11), 1182–1192 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gu, X.Q.: Dynamic properties of granular materials at the macro and micro scales. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (2012)

  25. Kokusho, T.: Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found. 20(2), 45–60 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakagawa, K., Soga, K., Mitchell, J.K.: Observation of Biot compressional wave of the second kind in granular soils. Géotechnique 47(1), 133–147 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wichtmann, T., Triantafyllidis, T.: On the influence of the grain size distribution curve on P-wave velocity, constrained elastic modulus \(M_{\rm max}\) and Poisson’s ratio of quartz sands. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30, 757–766 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, J., Madhusudhan, B.N.: Effect of relative density and confining pressure on Poisson ratio from bender-extender element tests. Géotechnique 60(7), 561–567 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thornton, C.: Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 50(1), 43–53 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, G.-L., Tatsuoka, F., Flora, A., Koseki, J.: Inherent and stress-state-induced anisotropy in very small strain stiffness of a sandy gravel. Géotechnique 47(3), 509–521 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishibashi, I., Caper, O.F.: Anisotropy and its relation to liquefaction resistance of granular material. Soils Found. 43(5), 149–159 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rothenburg, L., Bathurst, R.J.: Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials. Géotechnique 39(4), 601–614 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, Y., Frost, J.D.: Three-dimensional DEM modeling of triaxial compression of sands. In: Meier, R., Abbo, A., Wang, L.B. (eds.) GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference, ASCE, pp. 220–226 (2010)

  34. Yan, W.M.: Particle elongation and deposition effect to macroscopic and microscopic responses of numerical direct shear tests. Geotech. Test. J. 34(3), 238–249 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barreto, D., O’Sullivan, C.: The influence of interparticle friction and the intermediate stress ratio on soil response under generalized stress conditions. Granul. Matter 14(4), 505–521 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yimsiri, S., Soga, K.: DEM analysis of soil fabric effects on behavior of sand. Géotechnique 60(6), 483–495 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper is supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2012CB719803) and the Seed Funding for Basic Research scheme (Grant No. 201011159098) from the University of Hong Kong. The authors are also very grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqiang Gu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, X., Yang, J. & Huang, M. DEM simulations of the small strain stiffness of granular soils: effect of stress ratio. Granular Matter 15, 287–298 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-013-0407-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-013-0407-y

Keywords

Navigation