Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anterior Kugel herniorrhaphy approach when the onlay patch is omitted.
Methods
The study population comprised patients who underwent anterior Kugel herniorrhaphy without the onlay patch from 1 May 2009, to 31 June 2012. The onlay patch was omitted if the posterior wall defect did not exceed the inner Posiflex® ring diameter. After reviewing the clinical follow-up records and conducting telephone interviews, the postoperative results were recorded and analyzed.
Results
A total of 163 patients underwent 175 hernia repairs. One patient developed recurrence after undergoing our herniorrhaphy method. The most common postoperative complaints were mild soreness, indescribable discomfort, and foreign body sensations (11 patients). The mean operative time and hospital stay were 67 min and 2 days, respectively. More serious complications included one scrotal hematoma, one hydrocele, and one wound infection that resulted in epididymitis.
Conclusions
The onlay patch can be omitted with low recurrence and complication rates if the posterior wall defects do not exceed the inner Posiflex® ring diameter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Read RC (2009) Herniology: past, present, and future. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 13(6):577–580. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0582-2
Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 7(1):13–16. doi:10.1007/s10029-002-0088-7
Kugel RD (1999) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178(4):298–302
Zhou X (2013) Comparison of the posterior approach and anterior approach for a Kugel repair of treatment of inguinal hernias. Surg Today 43(4):403–407. doi:10.1007/s00595-012-0258-x
Reddy KM, Humphreys W, Chew A, Toouli J (2005) Inguinal hernia repair with the Kugel patch. ANZ J Surg 75(1–2):43–47. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03290.x
Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Wesen CA (2004) Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg 70(2):132–136 discussion 136
Li J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Tang W (2008) Early experience of performing a modified Kugel hernia repair with local anesthesia. Surg Today 38(7):603–608. doi:10.1007/s00595-007-3681-7
Usher FC, Wallace SA (1958) Tissue reaction to plastics; a comparison of nylon, orlon, dacron, teflon, and marlex. AMA Arch Surg 76(6):997–999
Uzzo RG, Lemack GE, Morrissey KP, Goldstein M (1999) The effects of mesh bioprosthesis on the spermatic cord structures: a preliminary report in a canine model. J Urol 161(4):1344–1349
Shin D, Lipshultz LI, Goldstein M, Barme GA, Fuchs EF, Nagler HM, McCallum SW, Niederberger CS, Schoor RA, Brugh VM 3rd, Honig SC (2005) Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg 241(4):553–558
Kugel RD (2003) The Kugel repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1119–1139. doi:10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00123-3
Van Nieuwenhove Y, Vansteenkiste F, Vierendeels T, Coenye K (2007) Open, preperitoneal hernia repair with the Kugel patch: a prospective, multicentre study of 450 repairs. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 11(1):9–13. doi:10.1007/s10029-006-0137-8
Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A (2003) The Millikan modified mesh-plug hernioplasty. Arch Surg 138(5):525–529. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.5.525 discussion 529–530
Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2002) Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16(12):1724–1728. doi:10.1007/s00464-001-8298-0
Inaba T, Okinaga K, Fukushima R, Ikeda Y, Yamazaki E, Koide T, Horikawa M, Inoue T, Ogawa E (2012) Chronic pain and discomfort after inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today 42(9):825–829. doi:10.1007/s00595-012-0153-5
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1988) Cause and prevention of postherniorrhaphy neuralgia: a proposed protocol for treatment. Am J Surg 155(6):786–790
Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89(11):1476–1479. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x
Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224(5):598–602
Hompes R, Vansteenkiste F, Pottel H, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F (2008) Chronic pain after Kugel inguinal hernia repair. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 12(2):127–132. doi:10.1007/s10029-007-0295-3
Maillart JF, Vantournhoudt P, Piret-Gerard G, Farghadani H, Mauel E (2011) Transinguinal preperitoneal groin hernia repair using a preperitoneal mesh preformed with a permanent memory ring: a good alternative to Lichtenstein’s technique. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 15(3):289–295. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0778-5
Koning GG, Koole D, de Jongh MA, de Schipper JP, Verhofstad MH, Oostvogel HJ, Vriens PW (2011) The transinguinal preperitoneal hernia correction vs Lichtenstein’s technique; is TIPP top? Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 15(1):19–22. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0744-2
Kehlet H, Roumen RM, Reinpold W, Miserez M (2013) Invited commentary: persistent pain after inguinal hernia repair: what do we know and what do we need to know? Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 17(3):293–297. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1109-4
LeBlanc KE, LeBlanc LL, LeBlanc KA (2013) Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 87(12):844–848
Conflict of interest
HCC, PHC, YLC, MYY, CCC, JL, PFW, and HJS declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
H.-C. Chiang and P.-H. Chen contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiang, HC., Chen, PH., Chen, YL. et al. Inguinal hernia repair outcomes that utilized the modified Kugel patch without the optional onlay patch: a case series of 163 consecutive patients. Hernia 19, 437–442 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1297-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1297-6