Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical failure of a lightweight polypropylene mesh

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the case of a 41-year-old male who underwent repair of a recurrent midline abdominal incisional hernia with components separation. The hernia defect was repaired with a 30 cm × 30 cm underlay biological (Strattice) mesh used to partially bridge a small residual gap between the rectus muscles and reinforced with a 30 cm × 30 cm lightweight polypropylene onlay mesh (BARD™ soft mesh). The patient later developed a large persistent seroma that was excised 18 weeks later. On exploration of the previous hernia repair, it was noted that the onlay polypropylene mesh had fractured leaving a 3 cm by 2 cm defect, but the underlying biological mesh was intact preventing a recurrence of the hernia (see Fig. 1). The fractured mesh was repaired with an additional onlay 10 cm × 10 cm polypropylene mesh, the seroma was de-roofed, and the patient was later discharged. This case highlights the early mechanical failure of a lightweight polypropylene mesh; the precise mechanism of failure in this case is unclear and, however, may be related to high intra-abdominal pressures postoperatively.

Photograph showing onlay polypropylene (BARD™ soft mesh) mesh superficial to a biological (Strattice) sublay mesh bridging the recti (on the left and right wound edges). Arrow indicates the 2 cm by 3 cm fracture

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 2

References

  1. Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92(2):166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Norton H, Heniford BT (2005) Normal intra abdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res 129:231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerdsirisopon S, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of potential damage to hernia repair materials due to fixation with helical titanium tacks. Surg Endosc 25:3890–3897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, Walsh MD (2005) Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair. Surg Endosc 19(12):1556–1560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. A. D. Lintin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lintin, L.A.D., Kingsnorth, A.N. Mechanical failure of a lightweight polypropylene mesh. Hernia 18, 131–133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0959-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0959-5

Keywords

Navigation