Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A two-centre blinded randomised control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix® plug and ProLoop® plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Mesh plug is an established and effective method for repair of inguinal hernia. The ProLoop plug® (Atrium) is a recently developed mesh plug with a novel configuration, which may offer advantages over the standard Prefix plug® (Bard) or the Lichtenstein repair. This two-centre double-blinded randomised control trial assessed the short- and medium-term outcomes, comparing the above three methods.

Patients and methods

Consecutive patients over the age of 18 years with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomised to receive a Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair (LTFM), Perfix® plug (Bard) (PF) or ProLoop® plug (Atrium) (PL) repair. Follow-up was at 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Endpoints were operative time, hospital stay, bodily pain scores, return to daily activity and complications.

Results

A total of 295 consecutive patients were recruited to the study. Ninety-three patients were randomised to receive PL plug repairs, 101 PF plug repairs and 101 LTFM repairs. There was no significant difference among the three groups in terms of age, sex or BMI. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of operative time (PL vs PF P = 0.92; PL vs LTFM P = 0.52), hospital stay (PL vs PF P = 0.74; PL vs LTFM P = 0.44), bodily pain scores (at 12 months PL vs PF P = 0.84, PL vs LTFM P = 0.85, PF vs LTFM P = 0.16), complication rates or return to daily activity.

Conclusions

The ProLoop® plug (Atrium) is a safe and effective method of repairing primary inguinal hernias. Its novel lightweight configuration does not increase the risk of recurrence when compared to thicker mesh plugs, and it may offer benefit in terms of long-term patient comfort. The ProLoop® plug (Atrium) represents a new effective alternative to the established mesh repairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Usher FC, Gannon JP (1959) Marlex mesh, a new plastic mesh for replacing tissue defects. I. Experimental studies. AMA Arch Surg 78:131–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE (2003) The Lichtenstein repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83:1099–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert AI (1989) An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 157:331–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM (1993) The mesh-plug hernioplasty. Surg Clin North Am 73:501–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1998) The Marlex mesh PerFix plug groin hernioplasty. Eur J Surg 164:549–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frey DM, Wildisen A, Hamel CT, Zuber M, Oertli D, Metzger J (2007) Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein’s operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 94:36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kingsnorth AN, Porter CS, Bennett DH, Walker AJ, Hyland ME, Sodergren S (2000) Lichtenstein patch or Perfix plug-and-patch in inguinal hernia: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of short-term outcome. Surgery 127:276–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelissier EP, Marre P (1998) The use of a plug in inguinal hernia. J Chir (Paris) 135:223–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein HS, Rabaza JR, Gonzalez AM, Verdeja JC (2003) Evaluation of pain and disability in plug repair with the aid of a personal digital assistant. Hernia 7:25–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Varga L, Leindler L, Hodi Z, Petri A, Balogh A (2000) A new method of tension-free inguinal hernia repair: “PROLENE hernia system” (PHS) (pilot study). Magy Seb 53:67–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trabucco E, Campanelli P, Cavagnoli R (1998) New polypropylene hernia prosthesis. Minerva Chir 53:337–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Swarnkar K, Hopper N, Nelson M, Feroz A, Stephenson BM (2003) Sutureless mesh-plug femoral hernioplasty. Am J Surg 186:201–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1995) Mesh plug hernia repair: a follow-up report. Surgery 117:597–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang CS, Huang CC, Lien HH (2005) Prolene hernia system compared with mesh plug technique: a prospective study of short- to mid-term outcomes in primary groin hernia repair. Hernia 9:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK

    D. L. Sanders, D. H. Samarakoon & C. S. Porter

  2. Department of Surgery, Lake Forest Hospital, Illinois, USA

    S. W. Ganshirt

  3. Plymouth Hernia Service, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK

    A. N. Kingsnorth

Authors
  1. D. L. Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. H. Samarakoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. W. Ganshirt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. S. Porter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. N. Kingsnorth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Kingsnorth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, D.L., Samarakoon, D.H., Ganshirt, S.W. et al. A two-centre blinded randomised control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix® plug and ProLoop® plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia. Hernia 13, 499–503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0540-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0540-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation